help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Speck, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gratwohl, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Speck, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gratwohl, A.
The Oncologist, Vol. 1, No. 6, 367–370, December 1996
© 1996 AlphaMed Press

Treatment of Aplastic Anemia

B. Speck, C. Nissen, A. Tichelli, A. Gratwohl

Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Correspondence: B. Speck, M.D., Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland. Telephone: 61-265-25-25; Fax: 61-265-44-50.

There is general agreement that in children and adolescents with an HLA-identical or syngeneic sibling, bone-marrow transplantation (BMT) should be performed without delay. More controversial are young-to-middle-aged adults with an HLA-identical sibling. Because of comparable survival rates, some centers advocate BMT; others advocate immunosuppression as primary treatment. BMT cures severe aplastic anemia (SAA), but has a higher early mortality. Immunosuppression usually induces hemopoietic improvement and has hardly any early mortality. However, there are late problems. After immunosuppression, there may be relapse and clonal hematopoietic disease. After BMT, there may be late graft failure, severe or even fatal chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Both procedures are followed by a slight increase in second malignancies. Retrospective studies show no significant differences in long-term survival between the two treatment modalities. In patients over the age of 40, immunosuppression is favored by most centers because in this age group there is a very high transplant-related mortality with BMT. Androgens and hematopoietic growth factors have hardly any role in therapy of SAA. Splenectomy helps some patients with severe thrombocytopenia and problems with supportive care, but does not improve the overall prognosis. BMT with unrelated donors has usually been performed in late stages of the disease with disappointing results.

Key Words. Aplastic anemia • Treatment • Bone marrow transplantation • Immunosuppression







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 1996 by AlphaMed Press.