This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) eLetters: Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints/Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shitrit, D. Articles by Kramer, M. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shitrit, D. Articles by Kramer, M. R.

Diagnostic Value of CYFRA 21-1, CEA, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and CA 125 Assays in Pleural Effusions: Analysis of 116 Cases and Review of the Literature

^a Pulmonary Institute and ^b Department of Internal Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqva, affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; ^c Department of Internal Medicine, Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

Mordechai Kramer, M.D., Pulmonary Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqva, Tel Aviv, 49100, Israel. Telephone: 972-3-9377221; Fax: 972-3-9377142; e-mail: kramerm{at}netvision.net.il

Levels of tumor markers in pleural effusions may help to establish the diagnosis of pleural malignancy, but the precise diagnostic value of each marker remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of five common pleural fluid tumor markers, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin fragment (CYFRA) 21-1, cancer antigen (CA) 15-3, CA 19-9, and CA 125, and to review the literature from the past 15 years. Pleural fluid samples were collected prospectively from 116 patients and assayed for CEA, CYFRA 21-1, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, and CA 125 levels. A MEDLINE search of the English-language literature from the past 15 years was also done.

Effusions were classified as benign or malignant on the basis of their definitive pathologic or cytologic diagnoses. The levels of all pleural tumor markers were statistically significantly higher in the malignant group than in the benign group. The marker with the highest accuracy was CEA (85.3%); CA 15-3, CYFRA 21-1, and CA 19-9 had similar accuracies (75.2%, 72.4%, and 71.5%, respectively), and CA 125 had the lowest accuracy (40.5%). On univariate analysis, tumor-marker combinations did not result in a greater accuracy than that of CEA alone. On multivariate logistic regression, CA 15-3 and CYFRA 21-1 were significant predictors of malignancy. Among the nine reports in the literature comparing 11 different tumor markers, CEA, CA 15-3, and CYFRA 21-1 yielded the best results. We conclude that pleural fluid analysis should include CEA for the diagnosis of malignancy. CA 15-3 and CYFRA 21-1 may serve as alternative options.

Key Words. Pleural effusion • Tumor marker • Sensitivity • Specificity • Accuracy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Elia, R. Massoud, G. Guggino, B. Cristino, C. Cortese, A. R. De Massimi, and R. Zenobi Tumor type M2-pyruvate-kinase levels in pleural fluid versus plasma in cancer patients: a further tool to define the need for invasive procedures Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 723 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Creaney, D. Yeoman, L. K Naumoff, M. Hof, A. Segal, A. W. Musk, N. De Klerk, N. Horick, S. J Skates, and B. W S Robinson Soluble mesothelin in effusions: a useful tool for the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma Thorax, July 1, 2007; 62(7): 569 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]