Advertisement

help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Oncologist, Vol. 12, No. 4, 418-425, April 2007; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-4-418
© 2007 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pentheroudakis, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pavlidis, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pentheroudakis, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pavlidis, N.

Cancer Medicine: Case Discussions

Cancer of Unknown Primary Site: Missing Primary or Missing Biology?

George Pentheroudakis, Evangelos Briasoulis, Nicholas Pavlidis

Department of Medical Oncology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece

Key Words. Cancer • Unknown primary • Molecular biology

Correspondence: Nicholas Pavlidis, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Medical Oncology, Ioannina University Hospital, Niarxou Avenue, 45500 Ioannina, Greece. Telephone and Fax: 30-26510 99394; e-mail: npavlid{at}cc.uoi.gr

Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) ranks as the fourth most common cause of cancer deaths and represents both a diagnostic and a management challenge. In CUP, the regression or dormancy of the primary tumor, the development of early, uncommon, systemic metastases, and the resistance to therapy are hallmarks of this heterogeneous clinical entity. Still, no consensus exists on whether CUP is simply a group of metastatic tumors with unidentified primaries or a distinct entity with specific genetic/phenotypic aberrations that define it as "primary metastatic disease." In this review, we present karyotypic analyses as well as the single-gene, single-protein studies done on the expression of oncogenes, tumor- or metastasis-suppressor genes, as well as angiogenesis effectors. These studies show frequent expression of oncoproteins, lack of activating epidermal growth factor receptor/c-Kit mutations or amplification, uncommon presence of tumor- or metastasis-suppressor gene mutations and highly active angiogenesis in CUP. Informative as they may be, these data have been observed in several solid tumors of known primary and failed to identify a CUP-specific molecular signature. The latter, if it exists, probably consists of a multigene expression pattern not captured by single-gene studies. Gene and protein microarray technologies offer promise for the unraveling of complex genetic programs that would either identify each CUP's primary tissue of origin or instead define the CUP-specific molecular signature. Confirmation of one of the two hypotheses would either improve primary disease–oriented therapy or develop CUP-oriented treatments targeting molecular aberrations that drive neoplastic growth/dissemination.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. Pentheroudakis and N. Pavlidis
Probing the unknown in cancer of unknown primary: which way is the right way?
Ann. Onc., January 20, 2010; (2010) mdp609v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2007 by AlphaMed Press.
Advertisement