The Oncologist, Vol. 12, No. 6, 631-635, June 2007; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-6-631
© 2007 AlphaMed Press
Development and Clinical Utility of a 21-Gene Recurrence Score Prognostic Assay in Patients with Early Breast Cancer Treated with Tamoxifen
Soonmyung Paik
Division of Pathology, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Correspondence: Soonmyung Paik, M.D., Division of Pathology, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Four Allegheny Center 5th floor, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15206, USA. Telephone: 412-359-5013; Fax: 412-359-3239; e-mail: soon.paik{at}nsabp.org
Although patients diagnosed with axillary nodenegative estrogen receptorpositive breast cancer have an excellent prognosis, about 15% of them fail after 5 years of tamoxifen treatment. Clinical trials have provided evidence that there is a significant benefit from chemotherapy for these patients, but it would be significant overtreatment if all of them were treated with chemotherapy. Therefore, context-specific prognostic assays that can identify those who need chemotherapy in addition to tamoxifen, or those who are essentially cured by tamoxifen alone, and can be performed using routinely processed tumor biopsy tissue would be clinically useful. Using a stepwise approach of going through independent model-building and validation sets, a 21-gene recurrence score (RS), based on monitoring of mRNA expression levels of 16 cancer-related genes in relation to five reference genes, has been developed. The RS identified approximately 50% of the patients who had excellent prognosis after tamoxifen alone. Subsequent study suggested that high-risk patients identified with the RS preferentially benefit from chemotherapy. Ideally the RS should be used as a continuous variable. A prospective studythe Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (Rx) (TAILORx)to examine whether chemotherapy is required for the intermediate-risk group defined by the RS is accruing in North America.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Montemurro and M. Aglietta
Hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: controversies in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
December 1, 2009;
16(4):
1091 - 1102.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Correa Geyer and J. S. Reis-Filho
Microarray-based Gene Expression Profiling as a Clinical Tool for Breast Cancer Management: Are We There Yet?
International Journal of Surgical Pathology,
August 1, 2009;
17(4):
285 - 302.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. H. Barrios, C. Sampaio, J. Vinholes, and R. Caponero
What is the role of chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer?
Ann. Onc.,
July 1, 2009;
20(7):
1157 - 1162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Sturgeon, M. J. Duffy, U.-H. Stenman, H. Lilja, N. Brunner, D. W. Chan, R. Babaian, R. C. Bast Jr., B. Dowell, F. J. Esteva, et al.
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers
Clin. Chem.,
December 1, 2008;
54(12):
e11 - e79.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Simon
The Use of Genomics in Clinical Trial Design
Clin. Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2008;
14(19):
5984 - 5993.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Sullivan
Imaging as a Quantitative Science
Radiology,
August 1, 2008;
248(2):
328 - 332.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Ross, C. Hatzis, W. F. Symmans, L. Pusztai, and G. N. Hortobagyi
Commercialized Multigene Predictors of Clinical Outcome for Breast Cancer
Oncologist,
May 1, 2008;
13(5):
477 - 493.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L.-P. P. Tran and J. L. Grabinski
Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Paradigm in Flux
Journal of Pharmacy Practice,
February 1, 2008;
21(1):
46 - 56.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2007 by AlphaMed Press.
|
|