Advertisement

help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

  Click here to read this article as a CME course


First Published Online October 6, 2008
The Oncologist, Vol. 13, No. 10, 1046-1054, October 2008; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0075
© 2008 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
theoncologist.2008-0075v1
13/10/1046    most recent
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stein, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Fojo, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stein, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Fojo, T.

Clinical Pharmacology

Tumor Growth Rates Derived from Data for Patients in a Clinical Trial Correlate Strongly with Patient Survival: A Novel Strategy for Evaluation of Clinical Trial Data

Wilfred D. Steina,b, William Doug Figga, William Dahuta, Aryeh D. Steinc, Moshe B. Hoshend, Doug Pricea, Susan E. Batesa, Tito Fojoa

aMedical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; bDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; cHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; dHebrew University-Hadassah School of Public Health, Hebrew University, Ein Kerem Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel

Correspondence: Tito Fojo, M.D., Ph.D., Medical Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 12N226, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. Telephone: 301-402-1357; Fax: 301-402-1608; e-mail: tfojo{at}helix.nih.gov

Received March 27, 2008; accepted for publication August 13, 2008; first published online in THE ONCOLOGIST Express on October 6, 2008.

Disclosure: The content of this article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias. No financial relationships relevant to the content of this article have been disclosed by the authors, planners, or staff managers.

Purpose. The slow progress in developing new cancer therapies can be attributed in part to the long time spent in clinical development. To hasten development, new paradigms especially applicable to patients with metastatic disease are needed.

Patients and Methods. We present a new method to predict survival using tumor measurement data gathered while a patient with cancer is receiving therapy in a clinical trial. We developed a two-phase equation to estimate the concomitant rates of tumor regression (regression rate constant d) and tumor growth (growth rate constant g).

Results. We evaluated the model against serial levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in 112 patients undergoing treatment for prostate cancer. Survival was strongly correlated with the log of the growth rate constant, log(g) (Pearson r = –0.72) but not with the log of the regression rate constants, log(d) (r = –0.218). Values of log(g) exhibited a bimodal distribution. Patients with log(g) values above the median had a mortality hazard of 5.14 (95% confidence interval, 3.10–8.52) when compared with those with log(g) values below the median. Mathematically, the minimum PSA value (nadir) and the time to this minimum are determined by the kinetic parameters d and g, and can be viewed as surrogates.

Conclusions. This mathematical model has applications to many tumor types and may aid in evaluating patient outcomes. Modeling tumor progression using data gathered while patients are on study, may help evaluate the ability of therapies to prolong survival and assist in drug development.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
W. D. Stein, J. Yang, S. E. Bates, and T. Fojo
Bevacizumab Reduces the Growth Rate Constants of Renal Carcinomas: A Novel Algorithm Suggests Early Discontinuation of Bevacizumab Resulted in a Lack of Survival Advantage
Oncologist, October 1, 2008; 13(10): 1055 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
C. H. Takimoto
Commentary: Tumor Growth, Patient Survival, and the Search for the Optimal Phase II Efficacy Endpoint
Oncologist, October 1, 2008; 13(10): 1043 - 1045.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2008 by AlphaMed Press.
Advertisement