Advertisement

help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

  Click here to read this article as a CME course


First Published Online December 4, 2008
The Oncologist, Vol. 13, No. 12, 1270-1275, December 2008; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0181
© 2008 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
theoncologist.2008-0181v1
13/12/1270    most recent
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Santini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ruzzo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Santini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ruzzo, A.

Gastrointestinal Cancer

High Concordance of KRAS Status Between Primary Colorectal Tumors and Related Metastatic Sites: Implications for Clinical Practice

Daniele Santinia, Fotios Loupakisb,c, Bruno Vincenzia, Irene Florianid, Irene Stasib, Emanuele Canestrarie, Eliana Rullid, Paolo Enrico Malteseb, Francesca Andreonie, Gianluca Masib, Francesco Grazianof, Giacomo Giulio Baldib, Lisa Salvatoreb, Antonio Russog, Giuseppe Perroneh, Maria Rosa Tommasinoi, Mauro Magnanie, Alfredo Falconeb,c, Giuseppe Toninia, Annamaria Ruzzoe

aDepartment of Oncology and hSurgical Pathology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; bDepartment of Oncology, Azienda USL6 Livorno, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Italy; cDepartment of Oncology, Transplants and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; dOncology Department, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy; eDipartimento di Scienze Biomolecolari, University of Urbino, Urbino, Italy; fDivision of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Salvatore, Pesaro, Italy; gSezione di Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Discipline Chirurugiche ed Oncologiche, and iDipartimento di Patologia Umana, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy

Key Words. Colorectal cancer • KRAS mutations • Concordance • Metastatic sites • Primary tumors

Correspondence: Daniele Santini, M.D., Ph.D., Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Rome, Italy. Telephone: 0039-06-225411206; Fax: 0039-06-225411934; e-mail: d.santini{at}unicampus.it

Received August 13, 2008; accepted for publication October 28, 2008; first published online in THE ONCOLOGIST Express on December 4, 2008.

Disclosure: The content of this article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias. No financial relationships relevant to the content of this article have been disclosed by the authors, planners, independent peer reviewers, or staff managers.

Purpose. Several studies have suggested that KRAS somatic mutations may predict resistance to cetuximab- and panitumumab-based treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Nevertheless, most experiences were conducted on samples from primaries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the grade of concordance in terms of KRAS status between primaries and related metastases.

Patients and Methods. We analyzed KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations from formalin-fixed sections of 107 CRC primaries and related metastases. Eight pairs were excluded from the analysis because of the low amount of tumor tissue in the available samples. The main characteristics were: 50 men, 49 women; median age at diagnosis, 71 years (range, 41–84). The metastatic sites analyzed were the liver in 80 patients (80.8%), lung in seven patients (7.1%), and other sites in 12 patients (12.1%).

Results. A KRAS mutation was found in 38 (38.4%) primary tumors and in 36 (36.4%) related metastases. The rate of concordance was 96.0% (95% confidence interval, 90.0%–98.9%). Discordance was observed in only four (4%) patients.

Conclusions. Our results indicate that the detection of KRAS mutations in either primary or metastatic tumors from patients with CRC is concordant and this assessment could be used to predict response to targeted therapies such as cetuximab and panitumumab.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. E. Baldus, K.-L. Schaefer, R. Engers, D. Hartleb, N. H. Stoecklein, and H. E. Gabbert
Prevalence and Heterogeneity of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA Mutations in Primary Colorectal Adenocarcinomas and Their Corresponding Metastases
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2010; 16(3): 790 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
V. Whitehall, K. Tran, A. Umapathy, F. Grieu, C. Hewitt, T.-J. Evans, T. Ismail, W. Q. Li, P. Collins, P. Ravetto, et al.
A Multicenter Blinded Study to Evaluate KRAS Mutation Testing Methodologies in the Clinical Setting
J. Mol. Diagn., November 1, 2009; 11(6): 543 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2008 by AlphaMed Press.
Advertisement