| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
aMultidisciplinary Oncology Institute, Genolier, Switzerland; bDepartment of Internal Medicine, Westpfalz Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany
Key Words. Anemia • Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents • 2007 EORTC guidelines
Correspondence: Matti S. Aapro, M.D., IMO Clinique de Genolier, 1 Route du Muids, 1272 Genolier, Switzerland. Telephone: 41223669106; Fax: 41223669131; e-mail: maapro{at}genolier.net
Disclosure: M. A. has received study grants and honoraria for consultancy and/or is on the speakers bureau of Amgen, Johnson and Johnson, Ortho Biotech, Sandoz, and Roche. H.L. has acted as a consultant for Amgen, Johnson and Johnson, and Biogenerix, and has received lecture fees from Amgen and Janssen-Cilag. No other potential conflicts of interest were reported by the authors, planners, reviewers, or staff managers of this article.
Anemia is frequently experienced by cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and can negatively impact the patient's prognosis. Blood transfusions, iron supplementation (in absolute or functionally iron-deficient anemias), and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are among the treatment options for anemia. Treatment options for anemia management should be selected based on the best benefit-to-risk ratio for each individual patient. In September 2007, the working party of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) updated their guidelines on the use of ESAs, which are summarized in this paper. ESAs reduce the number of transfusions required and significantly improve quality of life in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. A sustained hemoglobin level of about 12 g/dl should be the target for treatment with ESAs. ESAs should be used according to the EORTC guidelines and within label with carefully considered exceptions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Aapro, H. Ludwig, C. Bokemeyer, K. MacDonald, P. Soubeyran, M. Turner, T. Albrecht, and I. Abraham Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as a function of center- and patient-related variables: results from the Anemia Cancer Treatment (ACT) study Ann. Onc., October 1, 2009; 20(10): 1714 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Aapro An Update on Twenty Years of Anemia Management with Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Nephrology and Oncology/Hematology Oncologist, September 1, 2009; 14(suppl_1): 1 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Aapro and J. L. Spivak Update on Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents and Clinical Trials in Oncology Oncologist, September 1, 2009; 14(suppl_1): 6 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Locatelli and P. Gascon Is Nephrology More at Ease Than Oncology with Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents? Treatment Guidelines and an Update on Benefits and Risks Oncologist, September 1, 2009; 14(suppl_1): 57 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| THE ONCOLOGIST | STEM CELLS | CME | ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS |