Advertisement

help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

  Click here to read this article as a CME course


First Published Online January 31, 2009
The Oncologist, Vol. 14, No. 2, 155-163, February 2009; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0248
© 2009 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
theoncologist.2008-0248v1
14/2/155    most recent
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bromberg, J. E. C.
Right arrow Articles by van den Bent, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bromberg, J. E. C.
Right arrow Articles by van den Bent, M. J.

Neuro-Oncology

Oligodendrogliomas: Molecular Biology and Treatment

Jacolien E. C. Bromberg, Martin J. van den Bent

Neuro-Oncology Unit, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center/Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Key Words. Oligodendroglioma • Oligoastrocytoma • 1p • 19q • MGMT • Temozolomide

Correspondence: Martin J. van den Bent, M.D., Neuro-Oncology Unit, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center/Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 5201, 3008AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Telephone: 31-10-4391415; Fax: 31-10-4391031; e-mail: m.vandenbent{at}erasmusmc.nl

Received November 14, 2008; accepted for publication January 12, 2009; first published online in THE ONCOLOGIST Express on January 31, 2009.

Disclosures

Jacolien E. C. Bromberg: None; Martin J. van den Bent:Consultant/advisory role: Schering Plough; Honoraria: Schering Plough.

Section editors Jean-Yves Delattre and Tracy Batchelor have disclosed no financial relationships relevant to the content of this article.

The content of this article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias.

Target audience: Physicians who wish to advance their current knowledge of clinical cancer medicine in neuro-oncology.

Oligodendroglial tumors continue to receive much attention because of their relative sensitivity to chemotherapy. The histological diagnosis of oligodendroglial tumors is subject to considerable interobserver variation. The revised 2007 World Health Organization classification of brain tumors no longer accepts the diagnosis "mixed anaplastic oligoastrocytoma" if necrosis is present; these tumors should be considered glioblastomas (perhaps with oligodendroglial features). The 1p/19q codeletion that is associated with sensitivity to chemotherapy is mediated by an unbalanced translocation of 19p to 1q. Randomized studies have shown that patients with 1p/19q codeleted tumors also have a better outcome with radiotherapy. Histologically more atypical tumors are less likely to have this 1p/19q codeletion; here, other alterations usually associated with astrocytic tumors are often found. Some patients with tumors with classic histological features but no 1p/19q codeletion still have a very favorable prognosis.

Currently, the best approach for newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors is unclear. Early adjuvant chemotherapy does not provide a better outcome than chemotherapy at the time of progression. The value of combined chemoirradiation with temozolomide has not been proven in these tumors, and could at least theoretically be associated with greater neurotoxicity. Tumors with 1p and 19q loss can also be managed with early chemotherapy, while deferring radiotherapy to the time of further progression. The presently available second-line chemotherapy results are modest, and better salvage treatments are necessary. The molecular explanation for the greater sensitivity of 1p/19q codeleted tumors is still unclear, and this could, in part, be explained by more frequent MGMT promoter gene methylation.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2009 by AlphaMed Press.
Advertisement