First Published Online May 1, 2009 The Oncologist, Vol. 14, No. 5, 448-455, May 2009; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0284 © 2009 AlphaMed Press
Proactive Management of Adverse Events Maintains the Clinical Benefit of IxabepiloneSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA Key Words. Breast cancer • Epothilones • Ixabepilone • Treatment • Safety • Tolerability Correspondence: Denise A. Yardley, M.D., Breast Cancer Research, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, 250 25th Avenue North, Suite 110, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA. Telephone: 615-329-7274; Fax: 615-986-0029; e-mail: dyardley{at}tnonc.com Received December 19, 2008; accepted for publication March 26, 2009; first published online in THE ONCOLOGIST Express on May 1, 2009.
Disclosures: Denise A. Yardley: Consultant/advisory role: Through the author's institution, the Sarah Cannon Research Institute, the author has served on or will serve on Bristol-Myers Squibb breast cancer advisory board(s); the institution has received or will receive a consulting fee for these advisory boards, but the author does not receive these consulting fees directly; Research funding/contracted research: The author's institution has also received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and the author has participated as an investigator in studies funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; the author does not receive research funding directly from Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Ixabepilone is a novel microtubule-stabilizing agent with clinical efficacy in advanced breast cancer, including patients whose disease has progressed on prior anthracyclines and taxanes. The safety profile of single-agent ixabepilone and combination ixabepilone plus capecitabine therapy is reviewed, outlining the steps to effectively manage and prevent common adverse events. Ixabepilone is generally well tolerated, and importantly, its toxicity profile does not overlap with that of capecitabine. Peripheral sensory neuropathy and neutropenia are the most common toxicities associated with ixabepilone; both can be effectively managed by monitoring patients and then, depending on severity, instituting a treatment delay until recovery and reducing the ixabepilone dose for subsequent treatment cycles. Ixabepilone dose reductions are recommended for most grade 3 events, excluding transient fatigue, arthralgia, and myalgia, whereas treatment discontinuation is recommended for persistent grade 3 neuropathy or any grade 4 nonhematological toxicity. Because ixabepilone exposure is greater in patients with hepatic impairment and those receiving concomitant strong cytochrome P-450 CYP3A4 inhibitors, dose adjustments and restrictions are recommended according to the degree of hepatic impairment, whether ixabepilone is administered alone or in combination with capecitabine, and whether a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor is being coadministered. Patients should be premedicated with oral H1 and H2 antihistamines to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Unlike taxanes, corticosteroid premedication is not required unless a hypersensitivity reaction occurred during a previous cycle or during treatment with another Cremophor-containing agent. By effectively managing adverse events and taking steps to minimize them, clinicians can ensure that patients derive the maximum benefit from ixabepilone therapy.
Copyright © 2009 by AlphaMed Press. |