Advertisement

help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First Published Online August 14, 2009
The Oncologist, Vol. 14, No. 8, 816-827, August 2009; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0043
© 2009 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
theoncologist.2009-0043v1
14/8/816    most recent
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Febbo, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Febbo, P. G.

Genitourinary Cancer

Using Surrogate Biomarkers to Predict Clinical Benefit in Men with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Update and Review of the Literature

Andrew J. Armstronga, Phillip G. Febbob

aDepartments of Medicine and Surgery, Divisions of Medical Oncology and Urology, Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Duke Prostate Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; bDepartments of Medicine and Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Duke Prostate Center, Duke Institute for Genome Science and Policy, Durham, North Carolina, USA

Key Words. Prostate cancer • Surrogate markers • Prostate-specific antigen • src family kinases

Correspondence: Andrew J. Armstrong, M.D., Sc.M., Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Divisions of Medical Oncology and Urology, Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Duke Prostate Center, DUMC Box 102002, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Telephone: 919-668-8797; Fax: 919-668-7117; e-mail: andrew.armstrong{at}duke.edu

Received March 10, 2009; accepted for publication July 20, 2009; first published online in THE ONCOLOGIST Express on August 14, 2009.

Disclosures: Andrew J. Armstrong: Research funding/contracted research: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Phillip G. Febbo: Research funding/contracted research: Bristol-Myers Squibb.

This article discusses the unlabeled, investigational, or alternative use of dasatinib (Bristol-Myers Squibb) and AZD0530 (AstraZeneca) for prostate cancer.

The content of this article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias. No financial relationships relevant to the content of this article have been disclosed by the independent peer reviewers.

Recurrent prostate cancer has a complex molecular etiology and a prolonged disease course. Although initially responsive to androgen ablation, many men eventually become castration resistant, develop skeletal metastases, and are palliatively treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy, radiation therapy, bisphosphonates, and best supportive care. Given the modest success rates of the current standard of care, clinical trial enrollment is encouraged. Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a heterogeneous disease, both in clinical manifestations and outcomes, requiring an individualized approach to both patient care and trial design. Herein, we review surrogate markers of disease progression and treatment efficacy in advanced prostate cancer in light of recently published guidelines that have redefined eligibility, response criteria, and suitable endpoints in prostate cancer drug development. The guidelines have refined outcome measures to potentially better capture clinical benefit and the ability of novel targeted molecular and biologic agents to impact favorably on this disease. We consider prostate-specific antigen changes, circulating tumor cells, bone scan alterations, markers of bone metabolism (urinary N-telopeptide and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase), pain improvements, and progression-free survival. To illustrate the role and challenges of these potential biomarkers and endpoints in drug development, we discuss a class of novel molecularly targeted agents, the src kinase inhibitors. Given that there are currently no validated surrogate markers of overall survival for assessing early clinical benefit from systemic therapy in metastatic CRPC, incorporation of relevant biomarkers into all phases of clinical development is essential to accelerate drug development in this field.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2009 by AlphaMed Press.
Advertisement