Advertisement

help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First Published Online April 26, 2010
The Oncologist, Vol. 15, No. 5, 447-456, May 2010; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0277
© 2010 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
theoncologist.2009-0277v1
15/5/447    most recent
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pritchard, K. I.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pritchard, K. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to LinkedIn   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Breast Cancer

Review of the Clinical Studies Using the 21-Gene Assay

Catherine M. Kelly, Ellen Warner, Daphne T. Tsoi, Sunil Verma, Kathleen I. Pritchard

Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Key Words. Recurrence score • Prognostic test • Breast cancer • Adjuvant chemotherapy

Correspondence: Kathleen I. Pritchard, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, The University of Toronto, 2057 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5. Telephone: 416-480-4616; Fax: 416-480-6002; e-mail: Kathy.pritchard{at}sunnybrook.ca

Received November 9, 2009; accepted for publication February 10, 2010; first published online in THE ONCOLOGIST Express on April 26, 2010.

Disclosures: Catherine M. Kelly: None; Ellen Warner: None; Daphne T. Tsoi: None; Sunil Verma: None; Kathleen I. Pritchard: Consultant/advisory role: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis; Honoraria: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis.

The content of this article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias. No financial relationships relevant to the content of this article have been disclosed by the independent peer reviewers.

Purpose. A major challenge in treating early-stage hormone receptor (HR)+ breast cancer is selecting women who, after initial surgery, do not require chemotherapy. Better prognostic and predictive tests are needed. The 21-gene assay is the only widely commercially available gene signature that can be performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue.

Methods. We conducted a review of the literature supporting the prognostic and predictive ability of the 21-gene assay in HR+ node-negative and node-positive breast cancer patients in chemotherapy-/endocrine-treated and untreated populations.

We considered: (a) How accurate is the recurrence score (RS) as a prognostic factor for distant recurrence? (b) How accurate is the RS as a predictive factor for benefit from systemic therapy? (c) How does the RS compare with other prognostic/predictive factors such as tumor size, tumor grade, patient age, and integrated decision aids such as Adjuvant! Online? (d) How do patients and physicians view the 21-gene assay? (e) What are the cost implications of the 21-gene assay?

Results. The 21-gene assay: (a) provided accurate risk information; (b) predicted response to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil and to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy; (c) added additional information to traditional biomarkers; (d) was viewed positively by both physicians and patients; and (e) fell within the cost-effectiveness values in North America.

Conclusion. This assay may be offered to patients with node-negative HR+ breast cancer to assist in adjuvant treatment decisions. Data are accumulating to support the use of the 21-gene assay in HR+ node-positive patients.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to LinkedIn LinkedIn   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2010 by AlphaMed Press.
Advertisement