First Published Online April 26, 2010 The Oncologist, Vol. 15, No. 5, 447-456, May 2010; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0277 © 2010 AlphaMed Press
Review of the Clinical Studies Using the 21-Gene AssayDivision of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Key Words. Recurrence score • Prognostic test • Breast cancer • Adjuvant chemotherapy Correspondence: Kathleen I. Pritchard, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, The University of Toronto, 2057 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5. Telephone: 416-480-4616; Fax: 416-480-6002; e-mail: Kathy.pritchard{at}sunnybrook.ca Received November 9, 2009; accepted for publication February 10, 2010; first published online in THE ONCOLOGIST Express on April 26, 2010.
Disclosures: Catherine M. Kelly: None; Ellen Warner: None; Daphne T. Tsoi: None; Sunil Verma: None; Kathleen I. Pritchard: Consultant/advisory role: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis; Honoraria: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis.
Purpose. A major challenge in treating early-stage hormone receptor (HR)+ breast cancer is selecting women who, after initial surgery, do not require chemotherapy. Better prognostic and predictive tests are needed. The 21-gene assay is the only widely commercially available gene signature that can be performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue.
Methods. We conducted a review of the literature supporting the prognostic and predictive ability of the 21-gene assay in HR+ node-negative and node-positive breast cancer patients in chemotherapy-/endocrine-treated and untreated populations.
We considered: (a) How accurate is the recurrence score (RS) as a prognostic factor for distant recurrence? (b) How accurate is the RS as a predictive factor for benefit from systemic therapy? (c) How does the RS compare with other prognostic/predictive factors such as tumor size, tumor grade, patient age, and integrated decision aids such as Adjuvant! Online? (d) How do patients and physicians view the 21-gene assay? (e) What are the cost implications of the 21-gene assay?
Results. The 21-gene assay: (a) provided accurate risk information; (b) predicted response to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil and to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy; (c) added additional information to traditional biomarkers; (d) was viewed positively by both physicians and patients; and (e) fell within the cost-effectiveness values in North America.
Conclusion. This assay may be offered to patients with node-negative HR+ breast cancer to assist in adjuvant treatment decisions. Data are accumulating to support the use of the 21-gene assay in HR+ node-positive patients.
Copyright © 2010 by AlphaMed Press. |