| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Papers |
Mayo Foundation and Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
Correspondence: Edith A. Perez, M.D., Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA. Telephone: 904-953-2000; Fax: 904-953-2315; e-mail: perez.edith{at}mayo.edu
Paclitaxel has emerged as an important agent in the treatment of breast cancer. The efficacy and tolerability of this agent, as well as its lack of cross-resistance with anthracyclines, have spurred intensive clinical investigation worldwide. Optimization of paclitaxel dose and scheduling and evaluation of the drug in combination regimens are a central focus of investigations. Recent clinical evidence suggests that optimal dose of single-agent paclitaxel by 3-h infusion is 175 mg/m2. Trials evaluating administration schedule have not found either a 24-h or 96-h infusion to be superior to a 3-h infusion. Weekly moderate-dose paclitaxel administration is also generating much interest, given the high relative dose intensity and dose density delivered, yet very modest myelosuppression and manageable neurotoxicity observed.
As first-line therapy in metastatic disease, multiple studies have documented overall response rates in the range of 30%-60%. As second-line or salvage single-agent therapy in metastatic patients, paclitaxel generally affords an overall response rate of 20%-40%, even in anthracycline-resistant patients.
The novel mechanism of action and manageable toxicity of paclitaxel has led to successful incorporation into combination chemotherapy regimens. The combination of paclitaxel and doxorubicin has been the most extensively studied, with the role of this regimen continuing to evolve. Other combination regimens that appear to hold substantial promise as first-line metastatic treatment are paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel with trastuzumab (anti-HER2 antibody). The favorable results obtained in the metastatic setting have prompted phase II and phase III investigations of paclitaxel in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. In the adjuvant setting, a recent phase III study has indicated that the addition of sequential paclitaxel to standard therapy affords both disease-free and overall survival benefits.
Current investigations with paclitaxel will continue to optimize the role of this agent in the treatment of early- and advanced-stage breast cancer, addressing not only response rates but also survival and quality-of-life issues. The use of paclitaxel on a weekly schedule or with new therapeutic modalities, such as monoclonal antibodies, is also receiving much attention. While it is clear that paclitaxel is a very active agent in the treatment of breast cancer, it is hoped that these innovative trials will further maximize the potential of this agent in patients with breast cancer.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Amari, T. Ishida, M. Takeda, and N. Ohuchi Capecitabine Monotherapy is Efficient and Safe in All Line Settings in Patients with Metastatic and Advanced Breast Cancer Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., November 3, 2009; (2009) hyp145v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Moreno-Aspitia and E. A. Perez Treatment Options for Breast Cancer Resistant to Anthracycline and Taxane Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2009; 84(6): 533 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Colozza, E. de Azambuja, N. Personeni, F. Lebrun, M. J. Piccart, and F. Cardoso Achievements in Systemic Therapies in the Pregenomic Era in Metastatic Breast Cancer Oncologist, March 1, 2007; 12(3): 253 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Loesch, N. Robert, S. Jones, M. Elkordy, D. Ilegbodu, and L. Asmar Phase II Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel Schedule As Single-Agent, First-Line Therapy for HER-2/neu-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Community-Based Study J. Oncol. Pract, November 1, 2006; 2(6): 268 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. O'Shaughnessy Extending Survival with Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer Oncologist, October 1, 2005; 10(suppl_3): 20 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.E. Jones, J. Erban, B. Overmoyer, G.T. Budd, L. Hutchins, E. Lower, L. Laufman, S. Sundaram, W.J. Urba, K.I. Pritchard, et al. Randomized Phase III Study of Docetaxel Compared With Paclitaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5542 - 5551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bernard-Marty, F. Cardoso, and M. J. Piccart Facts and Controversies in Systemic Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer Oncologist, November 1, 2004; 9(6): 617 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Perez, V. J. Suman, N. E. Davidson, P. A. Kaufman, S. Martino, S. R. Dakhil, J. N. Ingle, R. J. Rodeheffer, B. J. Gersh, and A. S. Jaffe Effect of Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Breast Cancer in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant Trial J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2004; 22(18): 3700 - 3704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bianchi, J. Albanell, W. Eiermann, G. Vitali, D. Borquez, L. Vigano, R. Molina, G. Raab, A. Locatelli, B. Vanhauwere, et al. Pilot Trial of Trastuzumab Starting with or after the Doxorubicin Component of a Doxorubicin plus Paclitaxel Regimen for Women with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 9(16): 5944 - 5951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zelek, P. Cottu, M. Tubiana-Hulin, J.-M. Vannetzel, Ph. Chollet, J.-L. Misset, N. Chouaki, M. Marty, E. Gamelin, S. Culine, et al. Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and Fluorouracil in Taxane- and Anthracycline-Pretreated Breast Cancer Patients J. Clin. Oncol., May 15, 2002; 20(10): 2551 - 2558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Burstein, J. Manola, J. Younger, L. M. Parker, C. A. Bunnell, R. Scheib, U. A. Matulonis, J. E. Garber, K. D. Clarke, L. N. Shulman, et al. Docetaxel Administered on a Weekly Basis for Metastatic Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., March 13, 2000; 18(6): 1212 - 1219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Markman, A. Kennedy, K. Webster, B. Kulp, G. Peterson, and J. Belinson Paclitaxel-Associated Hypersensitivity Reactions: Experience of the Gynecologic Oncology Program of the Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center J. Clin. Oncol., January 5, 2000; 18(1): 102 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| THE ONCOLOGIST | STEM CELLS | CME | ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS |