Advertisement

help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spector, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Creed, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spector, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Creed, M. R.
The Oncologist, Vol. 3, No. 6, 432-438, December 1998
© 1998 AlphaMed Press


Original Papers

A Comparison of Oral Ondansetron and Intravenous Granisetron for the Prevention of Nausea and Emesis Associated with Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy

Jesse I. Spectora, Eric P. Lesterb, Eric M. Chevlenc, David Sciortinod, Jim H. Harveye, William Whaleyf, Stefan Madajewiczg, Randi Isaacsh, Howard D. Homesleyi, Sharon Yeej, Thomas M. Beckk, N. Simon Tchekmedyianl, Karen H. Crawfordm, Michael Amesm, Mary R. Creed, on behalf of the S3AA3004 and S3AA3007 Study Groupm

a Berkshire Hematology/Oncology, PC, Pittsfield, Massachusetts; b Lakeland Medical Center, St. Joseph, Michigan; c St. Elizabeth Hospital, Youngstown, Ohio; d Fort Wayne Medical Oncology/Hematology Inc., Fort Wayne, Indiana; e SORRA Research Center, Inc., Birmingham, labama; f West Paces Clinical Research, Atlanta, Georgia; g University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York; h Northern New Jersey Cancer Center, Hackensack, New Jersey; i Carolina Gynecological Oncology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; j Arcadia, California; k Mountain States Tumor Institute, Boise, Idaho; l Pacific Shores Medical Group, Long Beach, California; m Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

Correspondence: Mary R. Creed, M.S.N., Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Five Moore Drive, P.O. Box 13398, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-3398, USA. Telephone: 919-483-5196; Fax: 919-483-0103; e-mail: mrc7253{at}glaxowellcome.com

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron with i.v. granisetron each given as a single dose prior to administration of highly emetogenic cisplatin chemotherapy.

Patients and Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically confirmed malignancies were randomized to receive a single 24 mg ondansetron hydrochloride tablet plus a 50 ml i.v. infusion of normal saline, or a single 10 µg/kg (50 ml) i.v. infusion of granisetron plus a placebo tablet in this multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Study drug was administered 30 min prior to a single i.v. infusion of cisplatin (50-75 mg/m2), given over a period of <= three h. Concurrent administration of corticosteroids was not allowed. Efficacy measurements included the number of emetic episodes, need for rescue medication, and patient assessments of nausea and appetite. Complete response (CR) was defined as no emetic episodes, rescue, or withdrawal; major response was defined as one or two episodes. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events and changes in laboratory parameters.

Results: A total of 371 patients entered the study and received study drug, of whom 184 received ondansetron and 187 received granisetron. For all parameters tested, a single 24 mg oral ondansetron tablet was at least as effective as i.v. granisetron. CR was achieved in 58% of ondansetron-treated patients and 51% of granisetron-treated patients (95% confidence interval on the difference: -4% to 17%). Subjective assessments revealed no difference with regard to complete control of nausea, appetite, or satisfaction with antiemetic therapy. Both drugs were well tolerated; the most common adverse event was headache.

Conclusion: A single 24 mg oral dose of ondansetron is at least as safe and effective as a single i.v. infusion of 10 µg/kg of granisetron in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic cisplatin chemotherapy.

Key Words. Cisplatin • Chemotherapy • Antiemetics • Ondansetron • Granisetron • Vomiting • Nausea







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 1998 by AlphaMed Press.
Advertisement