Advertisement

help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frasci, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pacilio, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frasci, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pacilio, G.
The Oncologist, Vol. 4, No. 5, 379-385, October 1999
© 1999 AlphaMed Press

Is There Any Impact of New Drugs on the Outcome of Advanced NSCLC? An Overview of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group Trials

Giuseppe Frasci, Nicola Panza, Giuseppe Comella, Giovanni Pacilio

on behalf of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG)

Correspondence: Giovanni Pacilio, M.D., Via Manzoni 61 (villa Caporali), 80123-Naples, Italy. Fax: 39081640631; e-mail: cpacilio{at}tin.it

Lung cancer represents the major cause of cancer-related death in Europe and North America, accounting for 28% of all cancer deaths. Seventy to 80% of all lung cancers are non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), and approximately 75% of these patients present with locally advanced or disseminated disease.

Even though chemotherapy is now recommended in the majority of cases of unresectable NSCLC, it still fails to substantially modify the fate of these patients. In recent years, several active cytotoxic drugs (paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and irinotecan) have been developed, showing an overall response rate (ORR) <20% in NSCLC. Phase II/III trials testing these new agents in combination with cisplatin have been carried out in recent years with inconsistent results.

Large randomized trials testing cisplatin-paclitaxel, carboplatin-paclitaxel, and cisplatin-gemcitabine regimens have been reported showing no substantial superiority of these combinations over standard treatments. The ORR remained well below 50%, and the median survival times were quite far from one year. These data could suggest that the addition of a single new agent to a platinum compound could be insufficient to substantially improve the prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients.

In view of these disappointing data, the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group has tried to improve the fate of patients with advanced NSCLC by testing new triplet combinations, which combined cisplatin with two rather than one of the newest chemotherapy agents. To avoid an unacceptable increase in toxicity and/or a marked decrease in dose intensity, the standard schedules of administration of the three agents used in these studies were changed, and the schedule changes were evaluated in phase I trials aimed at determining the maximum tolerated dosages of the drugs. Subsequently, phase II and III trials were conducted.

The present paper summarizes the results of the clinical trials either completed or under way and aims to evaluate whether this stategy will result in a substantial prognostic improvement.

Key Words. NSCLC • Chemotherapy trials • Gemcitabine • Vinorelbine • Cisplatin • Survival







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 1999 by AlphaMed Press.
Advertisement