help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muto, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fraioli, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muto, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fraioli, G.
The Oncologist, Vol. 5, No. 3, 209-214, June 2000
© 2000 AlphaMed Press

High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy of Bronchial Cancer: Treatment Optimization Using Three Schemes of Therapy

Paolo Mutoa, Vincenzo Ravoa, Giancarlo Panellia, Gaetano Liguorib, Gaetano Fraiolic

a Department of Radiology, Casa Di Cura Villa Del Sole, Napoli, Italy; b Divisione di Chirurgia Toracica, Ospedale Ascalesi, Napoli, Italy; c Divisione di Chirurgia Toracica, Università Federico II, Napoli, Italy

Correspondence: Paolo Muto, M.D., Dept. of Radiotherapy, Casa di Cura Villa del Sole, Via Manzoni 15-80131, Napoli, Italy. Telephone: 39-081-7145955; Fax: 39-081-5479194; e-mail: vdsrt{at}tin.it

Purpose. Our aim is to demonstrate that a fractionated high-dose rate endobronchial brachytherapy (HDRBT) treatment is tolerable for patients with advanced (IIIA-IIIB) non-small cell lung cancer and gives an improvement of symptoms.

Patients and Methods. From January 1992 to July 1997, we treated 320 patients with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concomitant HDRBT with Ir192. Eighty-four patients received 10 Gy in one fraction from January 1992 to March 1993 (Group A); 47 patients received two fractions of 7 Gy each from April 1993 to December 1993 (Group B), and 189 patients received three fractions of 5 Gy each from January 1994 to July 1997 (Group C).

Results. Mean survival from diagnosis is 11.1 months and mean survival from last HDRBT is 9.7 months. The symptomatic response rate is 90% for dyspnea, 82% for cough, 94% for hemoptysis and 90% for obstructive pneumonia. Performance status was improved in 70% of patients. Follow-up is in the range of 5-36 months with 280/320 evaluable patients (87.5%) (40 patients were lost to follow-up). For the patients treated with three fractions of HDRBT plus EBRT, a smaller number of side effects occurred while relief from symptoms linked to bronchial obstruction and survival was similar for the three groups.

Conclusions. A three-fraction brachytherapy results in fewer side effects, such as bronchial fibrosis with or without stenosis, while survival and symptomatic relief are similar in the three groups treated.

Key Words. HDR Brachytherapy • Bronchial cancer • Radiotherapy • Scheme of therapy • Bronchoscopy • Non-small cell lung cancer




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. Ernst, D. Feller-Kopman, H. D. Becker, and A. C. Mehta
Central Airway Obstruction
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2004; 169(12): 1278 - 1297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2000 by AlphaMed Press.