help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lilenbaum, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lilenbaum, R.
The Oncologist, Vol. 6, Suppl 1, 16-19, February 2001
© 2001 AlphaMed Press


SUPPLEMENT

Options in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review and Report on a Phase II Study of Vinorelbine Plus Gemcitabine

Rogerio Lilenbaum

University of Miami School of Medicine and The Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami Beach, Florida, USA

Correspondence: Rogerio Lilenbaum, M.D., University of Miami School of Medicine and The Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4306 Alton Road, Miami Beach, FL 33140-2840, USA. Telephone: 305-535-3310; Fax: 305-35-3324; e-mail: rlilenbaum{at}salick.com

Although platinum-containing regimens prolong survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), toxicity remains substantial. There is a clear need for a nonplatinum-based regimen which is active, well tolerated, and suitable for outpatient administration. Vinorelbine and gemcitabine have different mechanisms of action and are both active in NSCLC. A phase II trial was undertaken to evaluate activity and tolerability when the two drugs were administered as a first-line combination regimen in 32 patients with stage IIIB/IV disease. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1,000-1,250 mg/m2 together with vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The overall response rate was 25%, median survival 8.3 months and one-year survival rate 38% (48% in patients of performance status 0-1). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 38% of 148 treatment cycles, however, thrombocytopenia was infrequent and there was no grade 3/4 anemia. Nonhematological toxicity was minimal. The response and survival rates experienced were comparable with standard platinum-based combinations. Ongoing randomized trials will further define the role of the vinorelbine/gemcitabine combination in advanced NSCLC.

Key Words. Vinorelbine • Gemcitabine • Lung Cancer




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
P. D. Cole, C. L. Schwartz, R. A. Drachtman, P. A. de Alarcon, L. Chen, and T. M. Trippett
Phase II Study of Weekly Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine for Children With Recurrent or Refractory Hodgkin's Disease: A Children's Oncology Group Report
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2009; 27(9): 1456 - 1461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. J. Edelman
New Directions in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Overview
Oncologist, February 1, 2001; 6(2008): 1 - 3.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2001 by AlphaMed Press.