help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aapro, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aapro, M. S.
The Oncologist, Vol. 6, Suppl 3, 36-39, June 2001
© 2001 AlphaMed Press


SUPPLEMENT

Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: Can We Define Its Role?

Matti S. Aapro

Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland

Correspondence: Matti S. Aapro, M.D., Clinique de Genolier, 1 Route du Muids, Genolier CH-1272, Switzerland. Telephone: 22-366-9136; Fax: 41-22-366-9131; e-mail to:aapro{at}cdg.ch

It remains unclear whether neoadjuvant therapy increases disease-free survival when compared with an approach in which chemotherapy is delayed until after surgery. However, the current rationale for neoadjuvant therapy is based on its usefulness in quickly evaluating the likely benefit of new approaches to treatment and tailoring therapy to the biological characteristics of the individual tumor. In the primary therapy of breast cancer, the Aberdeen study shows that patients unresponsive to an anthracycline-based neoadjuvant regimen may achieve a response when switched to docetaxel. Further, patients with an initial clinical response to CVAP were more likely to show a pathological complete response (pCR) at final assessment when four cycles of CVAP were followed by four of docetaxel than when CVAP was maintained for eight cycles (pCR rate 34% versus 16%). Early data suggest that this difference translates into significantly lengthened progression-free survival. As in other disease settings, it may be possible to devise nonanthracycline-containing neoadjuvant regimens which are at least as effective as those in current use.

Key Words. Neoadjuvant breast cancer • Doxorubicin • Cyclophosphamide • Docetaxel • Cisplatin




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. Berruti, M. P. Brizzi, D. Generali, M. Ardine, L. Dogliotti, P. Bruzzi, and A. Bottini
Presurgical Systemic Treatment of Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: Facts and Open Questions
Oncologist, November 1, 2008; 13(11): 1137 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Dadiani, R. Margalit, N. Sela, and H. Degani
High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Disparities in the Transcapillary Transfer Rates in Orthotopically Inoculated Invasive Breast Tumors
Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 64(9): 3155 - 3161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. C. A. Michel, T. M. Keller, J. M. Frohlich, D. Fink, R. Caduff, B. Seifert, B. Marincek, and R. A. Kubik-Huch
Preoperative Breast Cancer Staging: MR Imaging of the Axilla with Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Enhancement
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 527 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. S. Aapro
Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer: A Review of Key Findings from the 7th International Conference, St. Gallen, February 2001
Oncologist, August 1, 2001; 6(4): 376 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2001 by AlphaMed Press.