| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
MAYO CLINIC HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY REVIEW: PART 1 |
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins and The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Correspondence: Antonio C. Wolff, M.D., The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Bunting-Blaustein Cancer Research Building, Room 189, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21231-1000, USA. Telephone: 410-614-4192; Fax: 410-955-0125; e-mail: awolff{at}jhmi.edu
The greater use of screening has changed the stage distribution of breast cancer, and an increasing number of patients are diagnosed with earlier stages of the disease. Still, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains a major clinical problem in the United States and a common presentation in many parts of the world. There is no standard definition of LABC. One commonly used includes patients with large primary tumors greater than 5 cm (T3) or with skin/chest wall involvement (T4), and/or fixed axillary (N2) or ipsilateral internal mammary (N3) lymph node involvement. According to the tumor node metastasis staging, these usually include stage IIIa (T0-2N2 or T3N1-2) and stage IIIb (T4Nx or TxN3) disease. Inflammatory breast cancer (T4d) is included in most classifications despite its distinct clinical behavior and worse prognosis overall, but it serves as an example of combined modality intervention. Historically, the term LABC has been applied to those clinical presentations where the disease is considered inoperable. However, these therapeutic principles (including preoperative or primary systemic therapy [PST]) are increasingly being applied to patients presenting with tumors greater than 5 cm and negative lymph nodes (stage IIbT3N0) or even smaller tumors, who are considered to have operable disease and a better outcome than those traditionally classified as having LABC. PST is increasingly being used in otherwise operable stage I and II patients aiming at greater rates of breast conservation and earlier efficacy assessment. This article reviews many of these issues and ongoing research questions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O Camara, M Rengsberger, A Egbe, A Koch, M Gajda, U Hammer, C Jorke, C Rabenstein, M Untch, and K Pachmann The relevance of circulating epithelial tumor cells (CETC) for therapy monitoring during neoadjuvant (primary systemic) chemotherapy in breast cancer Ann. Onc., September 1, 2007; 18(9): 1484 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Narod and K. Offit Prevention and Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1656 - 1663. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Modlich, H.-B. Prisack, M. Munnes, W. Audretsch, and H. Bojar Immediate Gene Expression Changes After the First Course of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer Disease Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2004; 10(19): 6418 - 6431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| THE ONCOLOGIST | STEM CELLS | CME | ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS |