help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mincey, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Perez, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mincey, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Perez, E. A.
The Oncologist, Vol. 7, No. 3, 246-250, June 2002
© 2002 AlphaMed Press


MAYO CLINIC HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY REVIEW: PART 1

Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Recommendations for Management Based on Consensus Review and Recent Clinical Trials

Betty A. Minceya,b, Frances M. Palmierib, Edith A. Perezb,c

a Division of General Internal Medicine, b Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic, c Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA

Correspondence: Edith A. Perez, M.D., Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA. Telephone: 904-953-7283; Fax: 904-953-2315; e-mail: perez.edith{at}mayo.edu

Determining the optimal individual adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer patients is a challenging undertaking because it requires translating data from clinical trials that have involved thousands of patients into a highly individualized, risk-adjusted approach for the patient at hand. Choosing adjuvant therapy for women with breast cancer includes consideration of four issues: A) evaluation of risk of relapse; B) extrapolation of results from clinical trials; C) therapeutic ratio, and D) the patient's preferences following a thorough discussion with her physician. Data from recently completed phase III adjuvant trials and worldwide consensus conferences document the benefits of adjuvant therapy in improving disease-free survival and overall survival for patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer >1.0 cm in size. The benefits of hormonal therapy are clear, but limited to patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Anthracyclines lead to improved outcomes compared with nonanthracycline regimens. Taxanes appear to improve disease-free survival in patients with node-positive disease, although longer follow-up is required to assess their impact on overall survival. Some countries have reported a reduction in the mortality rate from breast cancer over the past several years. The improved survival rate is due, at least in part, to the use of adjuvant systemic therapy. Ongoing studies are evaluating targeted therapies, with the potential of remarkably improving patient outcome.

Key Words. Adjuvant therapy • Breast cancer • Taxanes • Anthracyclines




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Li, Y. Li, X. Wu, Q. Li, J. Yu, J. Gen, and X.-L. Zhang
Knockdown of Mgat5 Inhibits Breast Cancer Cell Growth with Activation of CD4+ T Cells and Macrophages
J. Immunol., March 1, 2008; 180(5): 3158 - 3165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Oncol PractHome page
R. Oratz, D. Paul, A. L. Cohn, and S. M. Sedlacek
Impact of a Commercial Reference Laboratory Test Recurrence Score on Decision Making in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
J. Oncol. Pract, July 1, 2007; 3(4): 182 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Z. Ring, R. S. Seitz, R. Beck, W. J. Shasteen, S. M. Tarr, M. C.U. Cheang, B. J. Yoder, G. T. Budd, T. O. Nielsen, D. G. Hicks, et al.
Novel Prognostic Immunohistochemical Biomarker Panel for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2006; 24(19): 3039 - 3047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. Espinosa, J.A. F. Vara, A. Redondo, J.J. Sanchez, D. Hardisson, P. Zamora, F. G. Pastrana, P. Cejas, B. Martinez, A. Suarez, et al.
Breast Cancer Prognosis Determined by Gene Expression Profiling: A Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Study
J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2005; 23(29): 7278 - 7285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Madhusudan, M. Foster, S. R. Muthuramalingam, J. P. Braybrooke, S. Wilner, K. Kaur, C. Han, S. Hoare, F. Balkwill, D. C. Talbot, et al.
A Phase II Study of Etanercept (Enbrel), a Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} Inhibitor in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2004; 10(19): 6528 - 6534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2002 by AlphaMed Press.