The Oncologist, Vol. 7, No. 5, 401409,
October 2002
© 2002 AlphaMed Press
Clinical Trial Design for Target-Based Therapy
Elizabeth Fox,
Gregory A. Curt,
Frank M. Balis
Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Correspondence:
Elizabeth Fox, M.D., Pediatric Oncology Branch, CCR, NCI, Building 10/Room 13C103, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1920, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1920, USA. Telephone: 301-402-6641; Fax: 301-480-8871; e-mail: foxb{at}mail.nih.gov
Anticancer drug discovery has shifted from an empiric random screening directed approach to a more rational and mechanistic, target-based approach, which reflects our rapidly expanding knowledge of the pathogenesis of a variety of forms of cancer at the molecular level, providing new targets for drug discovery and development. The clinical development of target-based anticancer drugs will require fundamental changes to the traditional clinical trial design and end points that have been used for conventional cytotoxic drugs. In the phase I and II settings, traditional end points (toxicity and response) may not be suitable for more selective, cytostatic target-based agents, and these end points may be replaced by biological or pharmacokinetic end points to define the optimal doses and the therapeutic effects of these drugs on their targets. For phase III trials, measurable clinical benefit will continue to be the primary end point. As our understanding of the complex pathways and networks controlling cell signaling, proliferation, and cell death expands, we must learn how and when to use agents to target specific steps in malignant transformation and proliferation, and we must adapt clinical trial design to test the clinical utility of this promising new class of anticancer drugs.
Key Words. Clinical trials • Drug development • Pharmacokinetics • Pharmacodynamics • Molecular targets
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Fu, A. Dowlati, and M. Schluchter
Comparison of Power Between Randomized Discontinuation Design and Upfront Randomization Design on Progression-Free Survival
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2009;
27(25):
4135 - 4141.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Chang, K. R. Lamborn, J. G. Kuhn, W.K. A. Yung, M. R. Gilbert, P. Y. Wen, H. A. Fine, M. P. Mehta, L. M. DeAngelis, F. S. Lieberman, et al.
Neurooncology clinical trial design for targeted therapies: Lessons learned from the North American Brain Tumor Consortium
Neuro Oncology,
August 1, 2008;
10(4):
631 - 642.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kim, E. Fox, K. Warren, S. M. Blaney, S. L. Berg, P. C. Adamson, M. Libucha, E. Byrley, F. M. Balis, and B. C. Widemann
Characteristics and Outcome of Pediatric Patients Enrolled in Phase I Oncology Trials
Oncologist,
June 1, 2008;
13(6):
679 - 689.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Tseng, K. W. Kang, M. Dandekar, S. Yaghoubi, J. H. Lee, J. G. Christensen, S. Muir, P. W. Vincent, N. R. Michaud, and S. S. Gambhir
Preclinical Efficacy of the c-Met Inhibitor CE-355621 in a U87 MG Mouse Xenograft Model Evaluated by 18F-FDG Small-Animal PET
J. Nucl. Med.,
January 1, 2008;
49(1):
129 - 134.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Agulnik, A. M. Oza, G. R. Pond, and L. L. Siu
Impact and Perceptions of Mandatory Tumor Biopsies for Correlative Studies in Clinical Trials of Novel Anticancer Agents
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 20, 2006;
24(30):
4801 - 4807.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-J. Cozzi, P. G. Parsons, S. M. Ogbourne, J. Pedley, and G. M. Boyle
Induction of Senescence in Diterpene Ester-Treated Melanoma Cells via Protein Kinase C-Dependent Hyperactivation of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway.
Cancer Res.,
October 15, 2006;
66(20):
10083 - 10091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Carducci and A. Jimeno
Targeting bone metastasis in prostate cancer with endothelin receptor antagonists.
Clin. Cancer Res.,
October 15, 2006;
12(20):
6296s - 6300s.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Vickers, J. Kuo, and B. R. Cassileth
Unconventional Anticancer Agents: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 2006;
24(1):
136 - 140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Freidlin and R. Simon
Evaluation of Randomized Discontinuation Design
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2005;
23(22):
5094 - 5098.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Gasparini, R. Longo, M. Fanelli, and B. A. Teicher
Combination of Antiangiogenic Therapy With Other Anticancer Therapies: Results, Challenges, and Open Questions
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 20, 2005;
23(6):
1295 - 1311.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. D. Anderson, P. C. Adamson, S. L. Weiner, M. S. McCabe, and M. A. Smith
Tissue Collection for Correlative Studies in Childhood Cancer Clinical Trials: Ethical Considerations and Special Imperatives
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 1, 2004;
22(23):
4846 - 4850.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. G. Roberts Jr, B. H. Goulart, L. Squitieri, S. C. Stallings, E. F. Halpern, B. A. Chabner, G. S. Gazelle, S. N. Finkelstein, and J. W. Clark
Trends in the Risks and Benefits to Patients With Cancer Participating in Phase 1 Clinical Trials
JAMA,
November 3, 2004;
292(17):
2130 - 2140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Simon and A. Maitournam
Evaluating the Efficiency of Targeted Designs for Randomized Clinical Trials
Clin. Cancer Res.,
October 15, 2004;
10(20):
6759 - 6763.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Wolf, H. Swaisland, and S. Averbuch
Development of the Novel Biologically Targeted Anticancer Agent Gefitinib: Determining the Optimum Dose for Clinical Efficacy
Clin. Cancer Res.,
July 15, 2004;
10(14):
4607 - 4613.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. K. Benjamin, F. H. Hochberg, E. Fox, P. M. Bungay, W. F. Elmquist, C. F. Stewart, J. M. Gallo, J. M. Collins, R. P. Pelletier, J. F. de Groot, et al.
Review of microdialysis in brain tumors, from concept to application:First Annual Carolyn Frye-Halloran Symposium
Neuro Oncology,
January 1, 2004;
6(1):
65 - 74.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. N. Gardner and M. Fernandes
New tools for cancer chemotherapy: computational assistance for tailoring treatments
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
October 1, 2003;
2(10):
1079 - 1084.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Catley, E. Weisberg, Y.-T. Tai, P. Atadja, S. Remiszewski, T. Hideshima, N. Mitsiades, R. Shringarpure, R. LeBlanc, D. Chauhan, et al.
NVP-LAQ824 is a potent novel histone deacetylase inhibitor with significant activity against multiple myeloma
Blood,
October 1, 2003;
102(7):
2615 - 2622.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by AlphaMed Press.
|
|