| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
SUPPLEMENT |
Cleveland Clinic Myeloma Research Program, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Correspondence: Mohamad A. Hussein, M.D., Cleveland Clinic Myeloma Research Program, The Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk R35, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. Telephone: 216-445-6830; Fax: 216-445-3434; e-mail: husseim{at}ccf.org
Multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease, with median survival rates of 4-6 years even with aggressive, high-dose chemotherapy, bone marrow transplantation, and intensive supportive care. Additionally, multiple myeloma is primarily a disease of the elderly, many of whom cannot tolerate aggressive chemotherapy. Thus, newer treatments with good safety profiles are needed to improve the quality of responses and, hopefully, to translate into prolonged progression and overall survival. The pathophysiology of multiple myeloma is complex, involving many pathways and interactions among cytokines, adhesion molecules, angiogenesis, and mechanisms of resistance, which, taken together, provide multiple targets for novel therapeutic modalities. Agents currently under investigation for treating multiple myeloma include thalidomide and its successors, PS-341, and arsenic trioxide. Thalidomide and immunomodulatory drugs both exhibit activity against multiple myeloma by affecting different levels of the immune system. PS-341 is a proteasome inhibitor that halts the cell cycle, resulting in apoptosis; it also inhibits a key transcription factor and may have antiangiogenic activity. Arsenic trioxide activates multicellular mechanisms to induce apoptosis, inhibit angiogenesis, and stimulate immune responses. Preclinical and early clinical data suggest that combination regimens should be pursued, given the different mechanisms of action of these compounds on the immune system and their non-overlapping toxicities at low dosages.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  T. C. Krivak, K. M. Darcy, C. Tian, D. Armstrong, B. E. Baysal, H. Gallion, C. B. Ambrosone, and J. A. DeLoia Relationship Between ERCC1 Polymorphisms, Disease Progression, and Survival in the Gynecologic Oncology Group Phase III Trial of Intraperitoneal Versus Intravenous Cisplatin and Paclitaxel for Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2008; 26(21): 3598 - 3606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Le Page, V. Ouellet, M. C.J. Quinn, P. N. Tonin, D. M. Provencher, and A.-M. Mes-Masson BTF4/BTNA3.2 and GCS as Candidate mRNA Prognostic Markers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 913 - 920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Zhou, W. F. Han, L. E. Landree, J. N. Thupari, M. L. Pinn, T. Bililign, E. K. Kim, A. Vadlamudi, S. M. Medghalchi, R. El Meskini, et al. Fatty Acid Synthase Inhibition Activates AMP-Activated Protein Kinase in SKOV3 Human Ovarian Cancer Cells Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 2964 - 2971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J-M Ferrero, B Weber, J-F Geay, D Lepille, H Orfeuvre, M Combe, F Mayer, B Leduc, H Bourgeois, D Paraiso, et al. Second-line chemotherapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin is highly effective in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in late relapse: a GINECO phase II trial Ann. Onc., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 263 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Pfisterer, M. Plante, I. Vergote, A. du Bois, H. Hirte, A. J. Lacave, U. Wagner, A. Stahle, G. Stuart, R. Kimmig, et al. Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin Compared With Carboplatin in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: An Intergroup Trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2006; 24(29): 4699 - 4707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Pagani, C. Sessa, F. Nole, E. Munzone, D. Crivellari, D. Lombardi, B. Thurlimann, D. Hess, R. Graffeo, M. Ruggeri, et al. Dose-finding study of weekly docetaxel, anthracyclines plus fluoropyrimidines as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer Ann. Onc., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 1609 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. T. Penson and M. V. Seiden Topotecan: Weighing in When There Are Many Options Oncologist, October 1, 2005; 10(9): 698 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Shi, J. Mao, G. Yu, J. Zhang, and J. Wu Tumor Vaccine Based on Cell Surface Expression of DcR3/TR6 J. Immunol., April 15, 2005; 174(8): 4727 - 4735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. O'Shaughnessy, C. Twelves, and M. Aapro Treatment for Anthracycline-Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer Oncologist, December 1, 2002; 7(90006): 4 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. Dunton Management of Treatment-Related Toxicity in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Oncologist, October 1, 2002; 7(90005): 11 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. F.W. Frijhoff, C. J. Conti, and A. M. Senderowicz Second Symposium of Novel Molecular Targets for Cancer Therapy Oncologist, August 1, 2002; 7(90003): 1 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Slack, S. Waxman, G. Tricot, M. S. Tallman, and C. D. Bloomfield Advances in the Management of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia and Other Hematologic Malignancies with Arsenic Trioxide Oncologist, April 1, 2002; 7(90001): 1 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| THE ONCOLOGIST | STEM CELLS | CME | ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS |
