This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the course for this article: Update on the Role of Topotecan in the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer eLetters: Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints/Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Herzog, T. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Herzog, T. J.

Update on the Role of Topotecan in the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Correspondence: Thomas J. Herzog, M.D., Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University Medical Center, 4911 Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, 3rd Floor, Maternity Building, St. Louis, Missouri 63110-1094, USA. Telephone: 314-362-3181; Fax: 314-362-2893; e-mail: herzogt{at}msnotes.wustl.edu

Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women. Most patients with ovarian cancer respond to first-line chemotherapy, but many relapse within 18 to 22 months. The development of efficacious salvage therapies that increase overall survival while maintaining quality of life is a great challenge in the treatment of this disease. Topotecan, a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, is currently indicated for the treatment of recurrent metastatic carcinoma of the ovary. In patients with relapsed ovarian cancer, the overall response rates on treatment with topotecan range from 19%-33% in platinum-sensitive patients, 14%-18% in platinum-resistant patients, and 5%-11% in platinum-refractory patients. The proportion of patients achieving stable disease ranges between 17% in refractory and 48% in sensitive patients. In phase III studies, topotecan was shown to be equivalent in efficacy to both paclitaxel and liposomal doxorubicin as second-line therapy in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Further, non-cross-resistance between topotecan and paclitaxel was demonstrated in a third-line, phase III crossover study, suggesting that topotecan may be effective in the first-line setting with paclitaxel and/or platinum. Hematologic toxicities include neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia; however, these toxicities are usually short lived, noncumulative, and manageable with dose modifications, including low-dose topotecan regimens. Nonhematologic toxicities are usually mild to moderate in severity. These data support the use of topotecan for second-line therapy and suggest that topotecan may also be effective in first-line therapy. Further studies with topotecan alone and in combination with other agents are needed to fully characterize the role and sequencing of topotecan in the salvage and first-line settings.

Key Words. Topotecan • Efficacy • Recurrence • Ovarian neoplasms • Paclitaxel