help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varella-Garcia, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Varella-Garcia, M.
The Oncologist, Vol. 8, No. 1, 45–58, February 2003
© 2003 AlphaMed Press


ORIGINAL PAPER
IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTICS

Molecular Cytogenetics in Solid Tumors: Laboratorial Tool for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy

Marileila Varella-Garcia

Department of Medicine, Medical Oncology Division, University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA

Correspondence: Marileila Varella-Garcia, Ph.D., University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Campus Box B188, 4200 East 9th Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA. Telephone: 303-315-3593; Fax: 303-315-3304; e-mail: marileila.garcia{at}uchsc.edu

The remarkable progress in the understanding of leukemogenesis was soundly sustained by methodological developments in the cytogenetic field. Nonrandom chromosomal abnormalities frequently associated with specific types of hematological disease play a major role in their diagnosis and have been demonstrated as independent prognostic indicators. Molecular pathways altered by chimeric or deregulated proteins as a consequence of chromosomal abnormalities have also significantly contributed to the development of targeted therapies, and cytogenetic assays are valuable for selecting patients for treatment and monitoring outcome. In solid tumors, significantly high levels of chromosome abnormalities have been detected, but distinction between critical and irrelevant events has been a major challenge. Consequently, the application of cytogenetic technology as diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic tools for these malignancies remains largely underappreciated. The emergence of molecular-based techniques such as fluorescence in situ hybridization was particularly useful for solid malignancies, and the spectrum of their application is rapidly expanding to improve efficiency and sensitivity in cancer prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy selection, alone or in combination with other diagnostic methods. This overview illustrates current uses and outlines potential applications for molecular cytogenetics in clinical oncology.

Key Words. Cytogenetics • Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) • Interphase FISH • Biomarker • Target therapy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
K. K. Sra, M. Babb-Tarbox, S. Aboutalebi, P. Rady, G. L. Shipley, D. D. Dao, and S. K. Tyring
Molecular Diagnosis of Cutaneous Diseases
Arch Dermatol, February 1, 2005; 141(2): 225 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2003 by AlphaMed Press.