Advertisement

help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. K.
The Oncologist, Vol. 9, No. 1, 33–42, February 2004
© 2004 AlphaMed Press


ORIGINAL PAPER
Gynecologic Oncology

Topotecan Dosing Guidelines in Ovarian Cancer: Reduction and Management of Hematologic Toxicity

Deborah K. Armstrong

Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Correspondence: Deborah K. Armstrong, M.D., The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Bunting Blaustein Cancer Research Building, Room 190, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA. Telephone: 410-614-2743; Fax: 410-955-0125; e-mail: darmstro{at}jhmi.edu

Topotecan dosing considerations and alternative dosing schedules to reduce and manage myelosuppression during the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer were reviewed. The myelosuppression patterns from phase I, II, and III clinical trials were analyzed to evaluate the degree of hematologic toxicity and to determine risk factors predictive of myelosuppression. Additionally, recent publications of alternative topotecan doses and schedules were examined. Extent of prior therapy, prior platinum therapy (particularly carboplatin), advanced age, impaired renal function, and prior radiation therapy were identified as potential risk factors for greater hematologic toxicity after topotecan therapy. Reducing the starting topotecan dose to 1.0 or 1.25 mg/m2/day is recommended to reduce the incidence of severe myelosuppression in high-risk individuals receiving topotecan for 5 consecutive days. Hematopoietic growth factors, transfusion therapy, and schedule adjustments may also help manage myelosuppression. Alternative schedules of 3-day or weekly dosing appear to have less myelotoxicity and are currently under evaluation. The clinical aspects of topotecan-related myelosuppression and results from clinical trials indicate that the dose, and possibly the dosing schedule, of topotecan can be modified to reduce hematologic toxicity and improve tolerance without compromising efficacy. Prospective individualization of topotecan dosing may prevent or minimize dose-limiting myelosuppression and allow patients to achieve the maximum topotecan benefit by improving their ability to complete therapy with fewer treatment delays. Ongoing clinical trials evaluating alternative dosing schedules with superior hematologic tolerability may facilitate the inclusion of topotecan in combination regimens for patients with ovarian cancer. Proposed topotecan dosing guidelines to reduce and manage myelosuppression are outlined.

Key Words. Bone marrow/drug effects • Drug toxicity • Ovarian neoplasms • Topotecan




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Sehouli, D. Stengel, G. Oskay-Oezcelik, A. G. Zeimet, H. Sommer, P. Klare, M. Stauch, A. Paulenz, O. Camara, E. Keil, et al.
Nonplatinum Topotecan Combinations Versus Topotecan Alone for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Phase III Study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2008; 26(19): 3176 - 3182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. M. Lichtman, H. Wildiers, E. Chatelut, C. Steer, D. Budman, V. A. Morrison, B. Tranchand, I. Shapira, and M. Aapro
International Society of Geriatric Oncology Chemotherapy Taskforce: Evaluation of Chemotherapy in Older Patients--An Analysis of the Medical Literature
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2007; 25(14): 1832 - 1843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. T. Morgan, Y. Nakanishi, D. J. Kroll, A. P. Griset, M. A. Carnahan, M. Wathier, N. H. Oberlies, G. Manikumar, M. C. Wani, and M. W. Grinstaff
Dendrimer-Encapsulated Camptothecins: Increased Solubility, Cellular Uptake, and Cellular Retention Affords Enhanced Anticancer Activity In vitro
Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 66(24): 11913 - 11921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
L. Fischer, E. Thiel, H.-A. Klasen, J. Birkmann, K. Jahnke, P. Martus, and A. Korfel
Prospective trial on topotecan salvage therapy in primary CNS lymphoma
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2006; 17(7): 1141 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
D. J. Stewart
Foreword--New Directions for Topotecan in Lung Cancer Treatment
Oncologist, December 1, 2004; 9(suppl_6): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. Ardizzoni
Topotecan in the Treatment of Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Update
Oncologist, December 1, 2004; 9(suppl_6): 4 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2004 by AlphaMed Press.
Advertisement