This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) eLetters: Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints/Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Klimo, P. Articles by Schmidt, M. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Klimo, P., Jr. Articles by Schmidt, M. H.

Surgical Management of Spinal Metastases

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Meic H. Schmidt, M.D., University of Utah, Department of Neurosurgery, 30 North 1900 East Suite #3B-409 SOM, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132-2303, USA. Telephone: 801-581-6908; Fax 801-581-4385; e-mail: meic.schmidt{at}hsc.utah.edu

Metastatic spread to the spinal column is a growing problem in patients with cancer. It can cause a number of sequelae including pain, instability, and neurologic deficit. If left untreated, progressive myelopathy results in the loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions. Except in rare circumstances, treatment is palliative. Traditionally, conventional fractionated external beam radiotherapy has been the treatment of choice. "Surgery" for metastatic spinal disease was, and generally continues to be, equated with laminectomy by many physicians. However, there has been a remarkable evolution in surgical techniques over the last 20 years. Today, the goal of surgery is to achieve circumferential decompression of the neural elements while reconstructing and immediately stabilizing the spinal column. This has been made possible by the use of different surgical approaches and the exploitation of a burgeoning array of internal fixation devices. More recently, minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as endoscopy, kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty, and stereotactic radiosurgery, have been added to the surgeon’s armamentarium. As the number of treatment options for metastatic spinal disease grows, it has become clear that effective implementation of treatment can only be achieved by a multidisciplinary approach. This will provide the surest means of maximizing the quality of the remainder of the patient’s life.

Key Words. Spine • Metastases • Surgery • Radiosurgery • Outcomes

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Kvale, P. A. Selecky, and U. B. S. Prakash Palliative Care in Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 368S - 403S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.J. Johnson, J. Ying, T. El Gammal, R.D. Timmerman, R.Y. Kim, and B. Littenberg Which MR Imaging Sequences Are Necessary in Determining the Need for Radiation Therapy for Cord Compression? A Prospective Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 32 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Klimo Jr., C. J. Thompson, J. R.W. Kestle, and M. H. Schmidt A meta-analysis of surgery versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic spinal epidural disease Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2005; 7(1): 64 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF]