This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) eLetters: Submit a response to this article Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints/Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gligorov, J. Articles by Lotz, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gligorov, J. Articles by Lotz, J. P.

Preclinical Pharmacology of the Taxanes: Implications of the Differences

CancerEst, APHP Tenon, Medical Oncology, Paris, France

Correspondence: Joseph Gligorov, M.D., CancerEst, APHP Tenon, Medical Oncology, 4 rue de la Chine, 75970 Paris cedex 20, France. Telephone: 33-156-016024; Fax: 33-156-016452; e-mail: joseph.gligorov{at}tnn.ap-hop-paris.fr

Taxanes are one of the most powerful classes of compounds among all chemotherapeutic drugs. Only 30 years separate the isolation of the first taxane from the results of direct clinical comparisons in metastatic breast, ovarian, and lung cancer between the two taxanes available in routine clinical practice. These results suggest a more favorable benefit-to-risk ratio for docetaxel compared to paclitaxel when these drugs are used as single agents or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in an every-3-week dosing regimen. Pharmacological data support the difference between the taxanes, likely explaining the clinical results. Considering the molecular pharmacology of the two drugs, docetaxel appears to bind to ß-tubulin with greater affinity and has a wider cell cycle activity than paclitaxel. Docetaxel also appears to have direct antitumoral activity via an apoptotic effect mediated by bcl-2 phosphorylation. In addition, docetaxel has a longer retention time in tumor cells than paclitaxel because of greater uptake and slower efflux. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the taxanes show both agents to be extensively metabolized in the liver, and paclitaxel has a nonlinear pharmacokinetic behavior while docetaxel has linear pharmacokinetics. These differences explain the more simple treatment schedule and favorable results for docetaxel as a single agent and in combination therapy. Last, but not least, there is a pharmacokinetic interaction between paclitaxel and the anthracyclines, an active class of compounds commonly used in the treatment of breast cancer. This pharmacokinetic interaction is associated with greater cardio- and myelotoxicities, which are sequence dependent. These pharmacological data likely explain the different clinical development strategies for the two molecules as well as the different clinical results from individual trials and direct comparisons.

Key Words. Taxane • Docetaxel • Paclitaxel • Pharmacology • Pharmacokinetics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Lipton Toward New Horizons: The Future of Bisphosphonate Therapy Oncologist, September 1, 2004; 9(suppl_4): 38 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]