help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertino, J.R.
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertino, J.R.
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, D.
The Oncologist, Vol. 1, No. 4, 223–226, August 1996
© 1996 AlphaMed Press


ADVANCES IN CANCER TREATMENT: THE CHABNER SYMPOSIUM

Resistance Mechanisms to Methotrexate in Tumors

J.R. Bertino, E. Göker, R. Gorlick, W.W. Li, D. Banerjee

Program of Molecular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA

Correspondence: Joseph R. Bertino, M.D., Program of Molecular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, RRL 601, New York, NY 10021, USA. Telephone: 212-639-8230; Fax: 212-639-2767.


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Mechanism of Action
 Decreased Transport
 Impaired Polyglutamylation
 Increased DHFR Enzyme Activity
 Mutant DHFR and Transcriptional...
 Tumor Suppressor Genes and...
 Strategies to Treat Tumor...
 References
 
The mechanisms of intrinsic and acquired resistance to methotrexate (MTX) in human tumors are reviewed herein. In blasts from patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia, resistance mechanisms found are decreased uptake and increased dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) activity. A major cause of intrinsic resistance to MTX in soft tissue sarcoma cells and in acute myelocytic leukemia appears to be a lack of drug retention, due mainly to low levels of polyglutamylation. A novel association between lack of the retinoblastoma protein and intrinsic MTX resistance has been found. This has been attributed to an increase in DHFR activity, due to an increased rate of transcription of this gene, stimulated by an increase in levels of free E2F, not sequestered by hypophosphorylated retinoblastoma protein.

Key Words. Methotrexate • Drug resistance • Leukemia • Sarcoma • Dihydrofolate reductase • Folylpolyglutamate synthetase • {gamma}-glutamyl hydrolase • Trimetrexate


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Mechanism of Action
 Decreased Transport
 Impaired Polyglutamylation
 Increased DHFR Enzyme Activity
 Mutant DHFR and Transcriptional...
 Tumor Suppressor Genes and...
 Strategies to Treat Tumor...
 References
 
In looking back on this field since Dr. Bruce Chabner was a postdoctoral fellow at Yale some 25 years ago, it’s been a fascinating series of developments, many of them not imagined or anticipated. Even in 1995, we are learning more about drug resistance, and particularly in tumors from patients, rather than from experimental tumors. Dr. Chabner and his colleagues have been major contributors to these advances, and in his new role as Clinical Director of the Cancer Center at the Massachusetts General Hospital, we look forward to even more innovative ideas for the treatment of patients with cancer.

In this short review, some of our current studies are described. Many talented investigators have contributed to these studies, including Dr. Bruce Chabner.


    MECHANISM OF ACTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Mechanism of Action
 Decreased Transport
 Impaired Polyglutamylation
 Increased DHFR Enzyme Activity
 Mutant DHFR and Transcriptional...
 Tumor Suppressor Genes and...
 Strategies to Treat Tumor...
 References
 
Following the introduction of aminopterin for the treatment of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia in 1948 [1], a less toxic analog, methotrexate (MTX) subsequently replaced aminopterin in the clinic in 1956 [2]. In the almost 50 years since the first patient was treated with aminopterin, the first antimetabolite found to be effective in treating leukemia, we have learned a great deal about the mechanism of action of this drug and mechanisms of resistance. This information has guided new drug development as well as resulted in more effective treatment schedules.

MTX is a potent inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), a key enzyme for intracellular folate metabolism, and functions to regenerate tetrahydrofolate from dihydrofolate, a product of thymidylate synthase (Fig. 1Go). As a consequence of DHFR inhibition, intracellular levels of tetrahydrofolate coenzymes are decreased, resulting in inhibition of thymidylate and consequently DNA biosynthesis, as well as purine biosynthesis [3].



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mechanism of action and resistance mechanisms to MTX. MTX enters cells by the reduced folate carrier (1), is polyglutamylated (2), and MTX or its polyglutamylated forms are potent inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase (3). MTX polyglutamates are broken down to the monoglutamate form in lysosomes (not shown in the figure) by {gamma}-glutamyl hydrolase and subsequently effluxed from the cell.

 
Drug resistance may occur rapidly in potentially curable tumors, and if cure is not achieved (e.g., 20%-30% of acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL] patients), leads to treatment failure. Resistance mechanisms to MTX have been extensively studied, mainly in experimental tumors propagated in vitro and in vivo. Five different resistance mechanisms have been described in cells that survive MTX treatment: 1) decreased accumulation due to impaired transport; 2) decreased retention as a consequence of lack of polyglutamate formation; 3) an increase in DHFR; 4) and altered (mutated) DHFR that binds MTX less avidly than the normal enzyme, and, most recently, 5) an increased level of a lysosomal enzyme, {gamma}-glutamyl hydrolase, that hydrolyses MTX polyglutamates [4] (Fig. 1Go).


    DECREASED TRANSPORT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Mechanism of Action
 Decreased Transport
 Impaired Polyglutamylation
 Increased DHFR Enzyme Activity
 Mutant DHFR and Transcriptional...
 Tumor Suppressor Genes and...
 Strategies to Treat Tumor...
 References
 
Transport resistance is a common mechanism of acquired resistance to MTX in experimental tumors both in vitro and in vivo [57]. Recently, the putative carrier for active MTX transport (the reduced folate transport carrier) has been isolated and the cDNA cloned [8, 9]. The study of MTX transport in tumor samples from patients has limitations, such as limited sampling, lack of internal controls and heterogeneity of tumors. An additional limiting factor to resistance assessment is the requirement of pre- and post-treatment samples for comparative analysis. A competitive displacement assay utilizing the fluorescent lysine analog of MTX (PT 430) was developed as a sensitive method of detection of transport resistance to MTX in cell lines as well as in blast cells from patients with leukemia [10]. After achievement of a steady-state level of intracellular PT 430 and subsequent incubation with the folate antagonists, MTX and trimetrexate (TMTX), which differ in the mode of carrier transport, produced characteristic displacement patterns of PT 430 [10]. We evaluated this assay for use in fresh blasts from patients with leukemia. Analysis of samples from 35 patients with untreated leukemia shows that 60% (60 ± 12) displacement of PT 430 occurs with MTX as well as with TMTX. When we analyzed blast samples from 32 relapsed patients who were considered to have acquired resistance to MTX, we found over half of the patient samples had less than 30% of displacement of PT 430 with MTX. Thus, decreased transport is a common resistance mechanism to MTX in relapsed ALL. This finding has important implications for clinical use of this drug and new drug development. The availability of cDNA clones for the reduced folate carrier should allow an elucidation of the molecular basis for transport defects. In acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia (ANLL), a disease considered to be naturally resistant to MTX, we found that transport resistance is uncommon (2 of 48 samples) in blast cells from untreated patients, indicating that uptake of MTX is not the basis for natural resistance to this drug (unpublished observations).


    IMPAIRED POLYGLUTAMYLATION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Mechanism of Action
 Decreased Transport
 Impaired Polyglutamylation
 Increased DHFR Enzyme Activity
 Mutant DHFR and Transcriptional...
 Tumor Suppressor Genes and...
 Strategies to Treat Tumor...
 References
 
Polyglutamylation of MTX is a metabolic process which has great pharmacologic importance. Long chain polyglutamates of MTX (n = 2 – 5) have an equal affinity for the target enzyme, DHFR, as does MTX itself and exit the cell much more slowly than MTX monoglutamates. The intracellular content of polyglutamate derivatives of MTX is controlled by a balance between folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS) and {gamma}-glutamyl hydrolase activities [4].

Patients with ANLL and patients with sarcoma are considered to be naturally resistant to MTX with low clinical response. To explore the reasons for this natural resistance, we examined these tumors for mechanisms known to produce MTX resistance in vitro and compared these results to those obtained studying blasts from a sensitive neoplasm, childhood ALL. Patient tumor samples were evaluated for formation of MTX polyglutamates after a 24-h incubation with 10 µM [3H]-MTX and HPLC analysis. Although the total MTX (MTX plus MTX polyglutamate content) was almost the same in ANLL and ALL, we found lower levels of long chain polyglutamates in sarcoma cells and ANLL blast cells as compared to ALL blasts [11, 12]. The amounts of long chain polyglutamates formed by ANLL blasts were quite variable. Of interest, monoblastic ANLL (M5) cells formed as much MTX polyglutamates as the childhood ALL blasts [13]. We also evaluated adult ALL blasts for in vitro MTX polyglutamate accumulation. Adult pre-B ALL and T cell ALL blasts were found to accumulate fewer MTX polyglutamates as compared to childhood ALL blasts [14]. A lower content of MTX polyglutamates could be due to decreased synthesis by FPGS or an increased catabolism of MTX polyglutamates by {gamma}-glutamyl hydrolase. We therefore are currently assessing activities of both of these enzymes in various leukemia blasts. A wide range of FPGS activity, proportional to FPGS mRNA levels, has been observed in leukemic blasts [15].


    INCREASED DHFR ENZYME ACTIVITY
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Mechanism of Action
 Decreased Transport
 Impaired Polyglutamylation
 Increased DHFR Enzyme Activity
 Mutant DHFR and Transcriptional...
 Tumor Suppressor Genes and...
 Strategies to Treat Tumor...
 References
 
MTX is a tight-binding inhibitor of DHFR, and the concentration of MTX required to achieve inhibition of enzyme activity increases in direct proportion to the amount of the enzyme in the target cells. It is now well established that an important mechanism of resistance of cells to MTX is an increase in DHFR activity due to amplification of the DHFR gene [16]. Mouse, hamster and human MTX-resistant cell lines have been described with increased levels of DHFR activity due to gene amplification [16]. Following reports indicating that gene amplification is a common mechanism of resistance in cell lines exposed to gradually increased doses of MTX, four case reports in the literature appeared, one from our laboratory, indicating that low-level gene amplification occurs in tumor cells from patients treated with MTX, consistent with the expectation that a low level of amplification would be sufficient to cause clinical resistance to this drug [5]. In ALL, we assessed the frequency of DHFR gene amplification as an acquired resistance mechanism to MTX. DHFR gene amplification was determined with a DNA dot blot assay and confirmed by Southern and Northern analysis and DHFR enzyme activity. We found that low-level (two- to fourfold) DHFR gene amplification was detected frequently in relapsed ALL blasts (9/29 samples) [17].


    MUTANT DHFR AND TRANSCRIPTIONAL OR TRANSLATIONAL CONTROL
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Mechanism of Action
 Decreased Transport
 Impaired Polyglutamylation
 Increased DHFR Enzyme Activity
 Mutant DHFR and Transcriptional...
 Tumor Suppressor Genes and...
 Strategies to Treat Tumor...
 References
 
Although mutations in the DHFR gene have been described in several MTX-resistant cell lines, in seven MTX-resistant blast samples from leukemia patients, we have not detected any mutant DHFR enzymes using DNA SSCP and sequencing DHFR cDNA (unpublished observations).

DHFR protein itself has a suppressive effect on translation of its own mRNA. When MTX binds to DHFR protein, this suppressive effect may be lost, allowing new enzyme synthesis [18, 19]. Thus far, limited data are available about the importance of these control mechanisms in clinical drug resistance.


    TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES AND DRUG RESISTANCE
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Mechanism of Action
 Decreased Transport
 Impaired Polyglutamylation
 Increased DHFR Enzyme Activity
 Mutant DHFR and Transcriptional...
 Tumor Suppressor Genes and...
 Strategies to Treat Tumor...
 References
 
The effect of the retinoblastoma gene (Rb), a tumor suppressor gene, on DHFR expression is under active investigation in this laboratory. Lack of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) may lead to MTX resistance as a consequence of an increase in DHFR mRNA expression and enzyme activity without gene amplification [20]. This increase has been linked to an increase in E2F, a transcription factor that is bound by hypophosphorylated retinoblastoma protein. In the absence of pRb, E2F levels increase in the cell, resulting in an increase in transcription of several genes involved in DNA replication, including DHFR [20].

Cell lines with mutated p53, a tumor suppressor gene, have the capacity to undergo gene amplification after antimetabolite exposure [21, 22]. We showed that low-level DHFR gene amplification in blasts from patients with ALL is also associated with p53 gene mutations [17]. Association of low-level DHFR gene amplification with p53 mutations in ALL blasts strengthens the concept that the loss of wild-type p53 function results in the loss of the checkpoint at the G1/S boundary and permits cells to enter S phase without repair of DNA damage caused by MTX.


    STRATEGIES TO TREAT TUMOR CELLS RESISTANT TO MTX
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Mechanism of Action
 Decreased Transport
 Impaired Polyglutamylation
 Increased DHFR Enzyme Activity
 Mutant DHFR and Transcriptional...
 Tumor Suppressor Genes and...
 Strategies to Treat Tumor...
 References
 
Understanding mechanisms of resistance to MTX in the clinic may allow the development of new treatment modalities and new drugs. For example, the finding that defective transport of MTX is the most common resistance mechanism to MTX in relapsed ALL has led to interest in drugs like TMTX, which do not utilize the reduced folate transporter for uptake. TMTX has broad preclinical antitumor activity, and leukemia cells which are transport resistant to MTX are collaterally sensitive to this drug [23]. However, clinical results with TMTX in relapsed ALL have been disappointing, as doses have been limited due to development of mucositis [24, 25].

The combination of TMTX and leucovorin (LV) is very active against pneumocystis carinii infections in AIDS patients without serious side effects [26]. While TMTX is transported by passive diffusion in this parasite, LV cannot rescue this organism because of the absence of the reduced folate carrier which is necessary for LV transport. With this combination, the side effects of TMTX on the host are eliminated, as normal host cells are protected by LV. In vitro cytotoxicity studies with CCRF/CEM human lymphoblastic leukemic cells showed that cells resistant to MTX because of defective transport are not protected from the cytotoxic effects of TMTX by LV, but MTX-sensitive cells are protected from TMTX by LV. Recently, we have also shown that TMTX with LV "protection" is a nontoxic and effective treatment for MTX transport-resistant CEM cells propagated in severe combined immunodeficient mice [27]. In view of these in vivo data, we plan to test TMTX with LV in relapsed ALL patients who demonstrate resistance to MTX associated with impaired uptake of this drug.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Mechanism of Action
 Decreased Transport
 Impaired Polyglutamylation
 Increased DHFR Enzyme Activity
 Mutant DHFR and Transcriptional...
 Tumor Suppressor Genes and...
 Strategies to Treat Tumor...
 References
 
Supported by grants from the American Cancer Society (#DHP-18K) and (PO1-CA-47179) from the USPHS.

From Advances in Cancer Treatment: The Chabner Symposium. STEM CELLS 1996;14:5-9.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Mechanism of Action
 Decreased Transport
 Impaired Polyglutamylation
 Increased DHFR Enzyme Activity
 Mutant DHFR and Transcriptional...
 Tumor Suppressor Genes and...
 Strategies to Treat Tumor...
 References
 

  1. Farber S, Diamond LK, Mercer RD et al. Temporary remissions in acute leukemia in children produced by folic acid antagonist, 4-aminopteroyl-glutamic acid (aminopterin). N Engl J Med 1948;238:787–793.[Medline]
  2. Li MC, Hertz R, Spencer DB. Effect of methotrexate therapy upon choriocarcinoma and chorioadenoma. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1956;93:361–366.
  3. Allegra CJ. Antifolates. In: Chabner BA, Collins JM, eds. Cancer Chemotherapy: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1990:110-153.
  4. Rhee MS, Wang Y, Nair MG et al. Acquisition of resistance to antifolates caused by enhanced {gamma}-glutamyl hydrolase activity. Cancer Res 1993;53:2227–2230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Schweitzer BI, Dicker AP, Bertino JR. Dihydrofolate reductase as a therapeutic target. FASEB J 1990;4:2441–2452.[Abstract]
  6. Goldman ID, Matherly LH. The cellular pharmacology of methotrexate. In: Goldman ID, ed. Membrane Transport of Antineoplastic Agents (International Encyclopedia of Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Section 118). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1986:241-281.
  7. Sirotnak FM. Determinants of resistance to antifolates: biochemical phenotypes, their frequency of occurrence and circumvention. NCI Monographs 1986;5:27–35.
  8. Dixon KH, Lanpher BC, Chiu J et al. A novel cDNA restores reduced folate carrier activity and methotrexate sensitivity to transport deficient cells. J Biol Chem 1994;269:17–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Williams FMR, Murray RC, Underhill TM et al. Isolation of a hamster cDNA clone coding for a function involved in methotrexate uptake. J Biol Chem 1994;269:5810–5816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Trippett T, Schlemmer S, Elisseyeff Y et al. Defective transport as a mechanism of acquired resistance to methotrexate in patients with acute leukemia. Blood 1992;80:1158–1162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Li WW, Lin JT, Tong WP et al. Mechanisms of natural and acquired resistance to antifolates in human soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Res 1992;52:1434–1438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lin JT, Tong WP, Trippett TM et al. Basis for natural resistance to methotrexate in human acute non-lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia Res 1991;15:1191–1196.[Medline]
  13. Göker E, Kheradpour A, Waltham M et al. Acute monocytic leukemia: a myeloid subset that may be sensitive to methotrexate. Leukemia 1995;9:274–276.[Medline]
  14. Göker E, Lin JT, Trippett TM et al. Decreased polyglutamylation of methotrexate in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults as compared to children with this disease. Leukemia 1993;7:1000–1004.[Medline]
  15. Lenz HJ, Schnieders B, Danenberg K et al. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS) gene expression: marked variation in human leukemia blast samples. Proc Am Soc Can Res 1993;34:504a.
  16. Schimke RT. Gene amplification in cultured cells. J Biol Chem 1988;263:5989–5992.[Free Full Text]
  17. Göker E, Waltham M, Kheradpour A et al. Amplification of the dihydrofolate reductase gene is a mechanism of acquired resistance to methotrexate in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and is correlated with p53 gene mutations. Blood 1995;86:677–684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ercikan E, Banerjee D, Waltham M et al. Translational regulation of the synthesis of dihydrofolate reductase. In: Ayling JE, Nair MG, Baugh CM, eds. Chemistry and Biology of Pteridines and Folates Vol. 338. New York: Plenum Press, 1993:537-540.
  19. Chu E, Takimoto CH, Voeller D et al. Specific binding of human dihydrofolate reductase protein to dihydrofolate reductase messenger RNA in vitro. Biochemistry 1993;32:4756–4760.[Medline]
  20. Li WW, Fan JG, Zielenski Z et al. Absence of retinoblastoma protein mediates intrinsic resistance to antimetabolites in sarcoma cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (in press).
  21. Yin Y, Tainsky MA, Bischoff FZ et al. Wild type p53 restores cell cycle control and inhibits gene amplification in cells with mutant p53 alleles. Cell 1992;70:937–948.[Medline]
  22. Livingstone LR, White A, Sprouse J et al. Altered cell cycle arrest and gene amplification potential accompany loss of wild type p53. Cell 1992;70:923–936.[Medline]
  23. Lin JT, Bertino JR. Trimetrexate: a second generation folate antagonist in clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 1987;5:2032–2040.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Kheradpour A, Berman E, Göker E et al. A phase II study of continuous infusion of trimetrexate in patients with refractory acute leukemia. Cancer Invest 1995;13:36–40.[Medline]
  25. Pappo A, Dubowy R, Ravindranata Y et al. Phase II trial of trimetrexate in the treatment of recurrent childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Pediatric Oncology Group Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:1641–1642.[Free Full Text]
  26. Allegra CJ, Chabner BA, Tuazon CU et al. Trimetrexate for the treatment of pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 1987;317:978–985.[Abstract]
  27. Lacerda JF, Göker E, Kheradpour A et al. Selective treatment of SCID mice bearing methotrexate-transport resistant human acute leukemia tumors with trimetrexate and leucovorin protection. Blood 1995;85:2675–2679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Nzila
The past, present and future of antifolates in the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum infection
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2006; 57(6): 1043 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertino, J.R.
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertino, J.R.
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, D.


HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS