Advertisement
help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Oncologist, Vol. 11, No. 2, 152-164, February 2006; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.11-2-152
© 2006 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reardon, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, P. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reardon, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, P. Y.

Therapeutic Advances in the Treatment of Glioblastoma: Rationale and Potential Role of Targeted Agents

David A. Reardona, Patrick Y. Wenb

a Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; b Center for NeuroOncology, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Key Words. Angiogenesis inhibitors • Glioblastoma multiforme • Targeted therapy • Tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Correspondence: David A. Reardon, M.D., Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3624, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Telephone: 919-684-3457; Fax: 919-684-6674; e-mail: reard003{at}mc.duke.edu and Patrick Y. Wen, M.D., Center for NeuroOncology, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, 44 Binney Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Telephone: 617-632-2166; Fax: 617-632-4773; e-mail: patrick_wen{at}dfci.harvard.edu

Received September 1, 2005; accepted for publication December 8, 2005.


   LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Top
 Learning Objectives
Abstract
 Glioblastoma Multiforme
 Current Treatment Options for...
 Targeted Agents
 Other Noncytotoxic Targeted...
 Combination Regimens
 An Update from the...
 Conclusions and Future...
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
After completing this course, the reader will be able to:

  1. Describe the genetic alterations frequently observed in GBM tumors as well as the cell signal transduction pathways that are aberrantly activated in these tumors.
  2. Discuss the clinical benefit recently associated with temozolomide chemotherapy for patients with GBM.
  3. Identify mediators of signal transduction pathways that are attractive targets of novel therapeutics in GBM patients.
  4. Understand the potential benefit associated with regionally administered therapies for GBM patients as a means to overcome drug delivery limitations into the central nervous system caused by the blood–brain barrier.
  5. Describe the rationale for combination regimens incorporating novel targeted agents for GBM patients.

Access and take the CME test online and receive 1 AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.com


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
Glioblastoma Multiforme
 Current Treatment Options for...
 Targeted Agents
 Other Noncytotoxic Targeted...
 Combination Regimens
 An Update from the...
 Conclusions and Future...
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Despite advances in standard therapy, including surgical resection followed by radiation and chemotherapy, the prognosis for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains poor. Unfortunately, most patients die within 2 years of diagnosis of their disease. Molecular abnormalities vary among individual patients and also within each tumor. Indeed, one of the distinguishing features of GBM is its marked genetic heterogeneity. Nonetheless, recent developments in the field of tumor biology have elucidated signaling pathways and genes involved in the development of GBM, and several novel agents that target these signaling pathways are being developed. As new details on the genetic characteristics of this disease become available, innovative treatment regimens, including a variety of traditional treatment modalities such as surgery, radiation, and cytotoxic chemotherapy, will be combined with newer targeted therapies. This review introduces these new targeted therapies in the context of current treatment options for patients with GBM. It is hoped that this combined approach will overcome the current limitations in the treatment of patients with GBM and result in a better prognosis for these patients.


   GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME
Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Glioblastoma Multiforme
Current Treatment Options for...
 Targeted Agents
 Other Noncytotoxic Targeted...
 Combination Regimens
 An Update from the...
 Conclusions and Future...
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
The incidence of primary brain tumors has increased dramatically over the past several decades [1]. More than half of the 18,000 patients diagnosed with malignant primary brain tumors in the U.S. each year have glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common primary brain tumor in adults [2]. Although GBM occurs in patients of all ages, the incidence is highest in the elderly, and GBM is slightly more common in whites and men [2, 3].

GBM is an anaplastic, highly cellular tumor with poorly differentiated, round, or pleomorphic cells, occasional multinucleated cells, nuclear atypia, anaplasia, endothelial proliferation, and pseudopalisading necrosis [3]. Signs and symptoms of GBM depend on the location, size, and rate of growth of the tumor and include headaches, seizures, focal neurologic deficits, and changes in mental status [2]. The World Health Organization classification system is used predominantly for naming astrocytomas, and in this system GBM can also be referred to as a grade IV astrocytoma [4].

Favorable prognostic factors include young age, good Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score, histology, absence of extensive necrosis, and a small residual tumor after surgical debulking [1, 2, 5, 6]. In the Brain Tumor Cooperative Group trials, 50% of patients aged <40 years survived for 18 months, compared with 10% of patients aged >60 years [2, 7]. Moreover, 34% of patients with KPS scores >70 were alive at 18 months, compared with 13% of patients with lower scores [2, 7].

Primary GBM develops de novo from glial cells, typically has a clinical history of <6 months, and is most common in older patients [8]. Secondary GBM develops over months or years from preexisting low-grade astrocytomas and predominantly affects younger patients [8]. The pathogenesis of GBM is most likely a multistep process that appears to involve several potential genetic alterations. Primary GBM tumors exhibit overexpression (>60% of cases) or amplification (>40% of cases) of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) gene (Fig. 1Go) [9–11]. The genetic alterations leading to these tumors also include loss of chromosome 10, amplification and overexpression of murine double minute 2 (MDM2), and deletion or mutation of the phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted from chromosome 10 (PTEN) gene [8]. In contrast to primary GBM, the development of secondary GBM is associated with inactivation of the tumor protein 53 (TP53) gene and overexpression of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) ligands and receptors [8, 9, 11]. This improved understanding of mechanisms of disease in GBM has led to advances in the use of existing agents and the development of new targeted therapies. These treatment options and their limitations are reviewed in this article.


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Formation of primary and secondary glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).Multiple genetic changes are involved in the development of primary and secondary glioblastomas. Controlling tumor growth will likely require the inhibition of multiple targets. Abbreviations: DCC, deleted in colorectal cancer; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; MDM2, murine double minute 2; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; PTEN, phosphate and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10; RB1, retinoblastoma 1 gene; WHO, World Health Organization. Adapted from Tysnes BB, Mahesparan R. Biological mechanisms of glioma invasion and potential therapeutic targets. J Neurooncol 2001;53:129–147, with kind permission from Springer Science and Business Media, and with permission from Ohgaki H. Genetic pathways to glioblastomas. Neuropathology 2005;25:1–7, with kind permission from Blackwell Publishing.

 

   CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR GBM
Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Glioblastoma Multiforme
 Current Treatment Options for...
Targeted Agents
 Other Noncytotoxic Targeted...
 Combination Regimens
 An Update from the...
 Conclusions and Future...
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Despite modern treatments and diagnosis techniques, the median survival duration for patients with GBM is only 9–15 months, and the majority die within 2 years [2]. Although GBM is surgically incurable in the vast majority of patients, surgical techniques remain an important tool for the management of patients with GBM, and complete surgical resection continues to be the goal [1]. Regardless of degree of resection, adjuvant therapy—historically limited to radiotherapy (RT) and more recently expanded to include RT plus chemotherapy—is administered after surgery (all patients receive RT regardless of the extent of resection). In early randomized studies, significant increases in survival (14–36 weeks) were achieved in patients with high-grade gliomas with the administration of 50–60 Gy of whole-brain radiation following surgery [2, 7, 12]. Although adjuvant chemotherapy is also used in the treatment of GBM, until recent clinical trials, adjuvant chemotherapy had only demonstrated a moderate increase in survival in a large retrospective meta-analysis [1, 2, 13–15].

However, recent trials investigating temozolomide (Temodar®; Schering-Plough Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ) have demonstrated efficacy in patients with recurrent glioblastomas [16]. Moreover, temozolomide plus RT in newly diagnosed patients resulted in a significantly longer median survival time and significantly greater 2-year survival rate than RT alone [17]. Nonetheless, although this important study established a new therapeutic standard of care, the median progression-free survival and overall survival times achieved with temozolomide plus RT were only 6.9 and 14.6 months, respectively. Furthermore, clinical benefits associated with the addition of temozolomide has been shown to be significantly compromised in patients with tumors exhibiting increased activity of the DNA repair enzyme 06-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase [18, 19].

Despite clinical and technological advances in the understanding and treatment of brain tumors over the last three decades, the survival of patients with GBM has not notably improved. With the exception of the modest activity associated with temozolomide, there is no standard chemotherapy for patients with high-grade glioma, and resistance to chemotherapy is common [13]. Moreover, it is unknown whether further refinements in imaging, surgery, radiation, or standard chemotherapy regimens will have a meaningful impact on the outcome of this disease [2]. Therefore, research focused on the development of new targeted agents and approaches is needed.


   TARGETED AGENTS
Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Glioblastoma Multiforme
 Current Treatment Options for...
 Targeted Agents
Other Noncytotoxic Targeted...
 Combination Regimens
 An Update from the...
 Conclusions and Future...
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Treatment of GBM often fails because the tumors are highly resistant to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and RT. However, knowledge of aberrant signaling pathways involved in GBM has elucidated new potential therapeutic targets (Fig. 2Go). Recent developments in targeted drug therapies may result in better treatment options for patients with GBM, and many of these agents are currently being tested in clinical trials (Table 1Go) [10].


Figure 2
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Therapeutic opportunities in growth factor receptor signaling pathways in glioblastoma multiforme. The tyrosine kinase activity of growth factor receptors is stimulated upon the binding of their cognate growth factors, which results in the stimulation of multiple downstream signaling cascades. These signaling pathways are important for a wide range of cellular functions, including protein synthesis, transcription, angiogenesis, regulation of the cell cycle, cell proliferation, and survival. Many components of these intracellular signaling pathways are potential therapeutic targets for developing new treatments against malignant gliomas, which are associated with poor prognosis in spite of all the therapeutic options currently available. Novel therapies targeting mechanisms involved in cell cycle dysregulation, evasion of apoptosis, angiogenesis, and escape from immune regulation offer promise for improving the prognosis of patients with malignant gliomas. Most of these novel agents have so far proven to be well tolerated but with limited efficacy as single agents. The combination of different targeted agents or the combination of targeted agents with conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy may improve the antitumor efficacy of new targeted agents. Abbreviations: EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, EGF receptor; ERK, extracellular signal–regulated kinase; GTP, guanadine triphosphate; HDAC, histone deacetylase; HIF1, hypoxia-inducible factor 1; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; IGFR1, IGF receptor 1; K, tyrosine kinase domain; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; PDGFR, PDGF receptor; PDK, 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase; PI3K, phosphoinositol 3-kinase; PKC, protein kinase C; PLC, phospholipase; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR, VEGF receptor. Adapted from Kesari S, Ramakrishna N, Sauvageot C et al. Targeted molecular therapy of malignant gliomas. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2005;5:186–197, with permission from Current Science, Philadelphia, and with permission from Jendrossek V, Belka C, Bamberg M. Novel chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2003;12:1899–1924.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Summary of targeted therapies for malignant glioma

 
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
Proliferation and survival pathways are mainly regulated via growth factors and their respective receptors [20]. EGF has been implicated in supporting oncogenesis and progression of human solid tumors and is a promising target for anticancer therapy [21]. In fact, the EGF receptor (EGFR) is amplified in >40% and overexpressed in >60% of glioblastomas [9, 10]. Moreover, upregulation of EGFR is positively correlated with GBM malignancy, and EGFR signaling may play a role in radiation resistance [20]. Initial investigations of targeted molecular therapies in GBM have focused on the inhibition of tyrosine kinases and associated growth factor pathways. Gefitinib (Iressa®; Astra-Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE) is a selective small-molecule inhibitor of the EGFR [10, 20]. Although gefitinib is generally well tolerated, patients with GBM in initial clinical trials with gefitinib had minimal tumor response and no improvement in overall survival [10, 22]. In one phase II study, 13% of patients remained progression free for a minimum of 6 months in response to gefitinib monotherapy [22]. A phase I/II study conducted by the North American Brain Tumor Consortium (NABTC) demonstrated partial responses after previous RT in 5 of 38 patients with GBM enrolled in the phase II study [23].

Erlotinib (Tarceva®; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Melville, NY) is another small-molecule inhibitor of the EGFR that also inhibits the constitutively active mutant EGFRvIII found in approximately 40% of GBM cases [10, 20]. Although erlotinib has also been generally well tolerated, initial clinical trials have produced mixed results. In an early phase I study, treatment of patients with GBM with erlotinib, alone or in combination with temozolomide, resulted in 8 partial responses, and two patients with stable disease (response rate, 40%) [24]. In addition, in an ongoing phase II study in patients with recurrent GBM, an overall response rate of 25% was reported, with an additional 25% of patients experiencing stable disease [25]. However, in another phase II study, the median progression-free survival time was only 12 weeks in patients treated with erlotinib [26]. Therefore, the potential role for erlotinib in the treatment of patients with GBM remains to be determined. The activity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors is influenced by activating EGFR mutations in the kinase domain, which are observed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but have not been observed yet in patients with GBM [27]. Furthermore, limitations imposed by the blood–brain barrier may have had an impact on the clinical activity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors to date.

Recent data suggest that detection of phosphorylated protein kinase B (Akt) in tumor specimens may predict lack of response to EGFR inhibitors [28]. Studies with dual tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also under way, which include early clinical trials on lapatinib (GW-572016; GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia), an EGFR and ErbB-2 inhibitor; and AEE788 (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ), an EGFR and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor [10]. Lapatinib has exhibited preliminary evidence of biologic and clinical activity in ErbB-overexpressing tumors [29], and AEE788 has antiproliferative and antiangiogenic activity in vitro and in vivo and is currently in phase I clinical trials [30].

In addition to the upregulation of EGFR signaling, upregulation of the PDGF receptor (PDGFR) pathway is also found in GBM [20]. Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec®; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation) is a potent small-molecule inhibitor of the Bcr-Abl receptor tyrosine kinase that has inhibitory effects on the PDGFR. Despite poor penetration across the blood–brain barrier, imatinib mesylate has been associated with modest activity in patients with recurrent GBM in phase II trials [31, 32]. Additionally, imatinib mesylate significantly enhanced the cytotoxic effect of ionizing radiation in a human glioblastoma cell line [33]. Additional studies will determine whether imatinib mesylate has a role in the treatment of GBM. CP-673,451 (Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York), another inhibitor of the PDGFR pathway, potently inhibited PDGFR-ß in an ex vivo glioblastoma tumor model [34]. Other potential tyrosine kinase targets include the inhibition of Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K)/ Akt pathways, farnesyltransferase, rapamycin, histone deacetylation, insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR), cell cycle components, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-ß), and heat shock protein 90 (hsp-90) (Table 1Go) [10]. Further development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for GBM patients should include study designs that incorporate intratumoral pharmacodynamic assessment of specific target inhibition. Validation of suppression of target signaling is of particular importance for brain tumors, given the inherent difficulties associated with delivery of therapeutics into the central nervous system (CNS).

Angiogenesis Inhibitors
The growth and survival of GBM are dependent on an adequate blood supply, and not surprisingly, malignant gliomas are highly vascularized [10]. The formation of new blood vessels is coordinated by the complex interaction of many angiogenic factors, including VEGF, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and PDGF [10]. Therefore, targeting factors and pathways implicated in angiogenesis may represent potential approaches to the treatment of this disease.

Because VEGF represents a major stimulatory factor for the initiation of angiogenesis, the inhibition of VEGFRs is a promising treatment for malignant gliomas [10, 20]. PTK787/ZK 222584 (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Schering AG Corporation), a VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, decreases glioma growth and vascularization in vivo and is currently being investigated in phase I/II trials alone or in combination with lomustine or temozolomide in patients with GBM [10, 35].

Other VEGFR inhibitors, including ZD6474 (ZactimaTM; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals) and CEP-7055 (sanofi-aventis, Bridgewater, NJ), have produced significant growth inhibition of glioblastoma xenografts in nude mice [10]. Clinical trials of these and other VEGFR inhibitors, such as sorafenib (BAY 43-9006; Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, West Haven, CT, and Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Emeryville, CA) and AZD2171 (AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals), are ongoing or being planned [10, 36].

In recent trials, monotherapy with thalidomide (Thalomid®; Celgene Corporation, Warren, NJ) has been investigated for the treatment of GBM because of its antiangiogenic effects. However, results suggest thalidomide alone has only moderate antitumor activity in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas [20, 37]. Nonetheless, the combination of thalidomide and chemotherapy appears to be more active in patients with recurrent gliomas than either agent alone [20, 38]. The {alpha}vß3 integrin inhibitor cilengitide (EMD 121974; EMD Pharmaceuticals, Durham, NC) induces apoptosis in brain tumor cells, and the protein kinase C (PKC) ß2 inhibitor enzastaurin (LY317615; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis) decreases VEGF levels in a mouse tumor model [39, 40]. Phase II trials in recurrent gliomas are under way for both of these agents [10]. Furthermore, metalloproteinase inhibitors, including SI-27 (Shionogi and Company Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and batimastat (British Biotech Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Oxford, UK), inhibit angiogenesis invasion in vivo and have therapeutic potential for the treatment of GBM [10, 41]. Other angiogenic inhibitors of interest include cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors, angiostatin, atrasentan (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL), and lenalidomide (Revlimid®; Celgene Corporation) [10, 20, 42–44].

A new approach for delivering antiangiogenic agents to gliomas uses naked plasmid DNA targeted to brain tumors via intra-arterial injection [45]. The intra-arterial delivery of the gene for endostatin, a suppressor of angiogenesis, was recently investigated in a rat gliosarcoma model. Administration of the endostatin gene resulted in an 80% tumor volume reduction, and survival time was up to 47% longer [45].

To achieve the greatest therapeutic benefit from antiangiogenic agents, it will be important to determine the most effective combinations of therapies and drugs. Agents that target multiple receptors, including sorafenib, valatinib (PTK787/ZK222584), sunitinib (SU011248) (Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York), ZD6474 (zactima) and AEE788, allow a multipronged attack against vascularization (Table 1Go) [10, 46]. Ultimately, the most effective treatment strategies may be tailored to the molecular phenotype of a patient’s tumor and include chemotherapy in combination with cytostatic agents.

Bevacizumab (Avastin®; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA), a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody targeting VEGF, has been recently approved for use in colorectal carcinoma based on a significant survival benefit observed following its addition to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy [47]. Similarly, Stark-Vance recently reported that, among 21 patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan (Camptosar®; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals), one patient achieved a complete response, eight achieved partial responses, and 11 achieved stable disease [48]. Overall, the regimen was reported as well tolerated, although two deaths occurred on treatment, including one patient with an intracranial hemorrhage and one patient with bowel perforation. A formal, single-arm phase II study of bevacizumab plus irinotecan is being performed at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke University Medical Center for patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Preliminary analyses of results of this trial reveal that this regimen is well tolerated among malignant glioma patients and is associated with a highly exciting rate of radiographic response. Further investigation of the regimen of bevacizumab plus irinotecan is planned.


   OTHER NONCYTOTOXIC TARGETED THERAPIES
Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Glioblastoma Multiforme
 Current Treatment Options for...
 Targeted Agents
 Other Noncytotoxic Targeted...
Combination Regimens
 An Update from the...
 Conclusions and Future...
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Inhibitors of Ras/MAPK and PI3K/Akt Pathways
Activation of a variety of growth-factor receptor pathways are thought to be involved in the development of malignant gliomas. Identifying and targeting common downstream mediators of growth-factor signaling, such as the Ras/MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways, may yield additional potential therapeutic options. Farnesyltransferase is involved with signal transduction in the Ras pathway, and two farnesyltransferase inhibitors, tipifarnib (ZarnestraTM; Ortho Biotech Products, L.P., Bridgewater, NJ) and lonafarnib (SarasarTM; Schering-Plough Corporation), have been evaluated in clinical trials in patients with malignant gliomas(Table 1Go)[10,49].Tipifarnib had modest activity in gliomas as a single agent in phase I/ II trials, and combined trials with RT or temozolomide are under way [10, 50].Although gastrointestinal toxicities were reported, positive clinical activity was observed in pancreatic and NSCLC in phase I/II studies of lonafarnib [51].

The PI3K/Akt pathway is activated through a sequence of events involving several growth-factor receptors, including EGFR and PDGFR [10]. The PTEN tumor suppressor gene, which is inactivated in 40%–50% of GBM cases, usually inhibits the PI3K/Akt pathway. Greater PI3K activity has been associated with greater resistance to RT[52].Therefore, inhibitors of the PI3K/Akt pathway may be potential therapeutic agents for GBM. Several inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)—a downstream target of PI3K signaling—are being investigated in clinical trials [10, 53, 54]. These agents include sirolimus (rapamycin, Rapamune®; Wyeth, Madison, NJ), temsirolimus (CCI-779; Wyeth), everolimus (Certican®; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation), and AP23573 (ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA), all of which inhibit glioblastoma cell proliferation in culture and intracerebral xenografts. Temsirolimus demonstrated modest activity in recurrent gliomas in recent phase I/II studies [55, 56]. LY294002, an inhibitor of PI3K, sensitized a mutant glioma cell line to doses of clinically relevant radiation [52].

Inhibitors of Proteasomes and Histone Deacetylases
The ubiquitin/proteasome system is the main post-transcriptional degradation mechanism of proteins involved in the cell cycle, DNA transcription and repair, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and cell growth [57]. Therefore, the development of drugs that target this system is a potential new anticancer strategy. Indeed, bortezomib (Velcade®; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA), a proteasome inhibitor, induces apoptosis in human GBM cell lines and primary GBM explants and is currently in phase I trials in patients with recurrent or progressive gliomas [57, 58].

There is evidence that histone acetyltransferase activity is altered in malignant gliomas [10]. Clinical trials of several histone deacetylase inhibitors, including valproic acid, depsipeptide, and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), are under way or planned [59]. Other potential targets for therapy of malignant gliomas include poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), nuclear factor kappa B (NF{kappa}B), IGFR, Raf, MAPK/extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK), Akt, cell cycle components, TGF-ß, aurora kinases, and hsp-90 [10, 60–62].

Intratumoral Therapy
Approaches that directly target the tumor increase the exposure of tumor cells to the drug and reduce the probability of systemic complications. Cancer cells frequently express different cell surface proteins than their noncancerous counterparts [63]. Therefore, regional delivery of monoclonal antibodies to the tumor is an area of ongoing research [54]. Indeed, a category of monoclonal antibodies raised against the EGFR recognizes tumors with EGFR amplification/overexpression but not normal tissues or tumors with native EGFR levels [64]. Moreover, recent studies using radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies directed at tenascin or EGFR show that a survival benefit in patients with gliomas may be possible with intratumoral immunotherapy [10, 65]. In addition, monoclonal antibodies can be armed with toxins to target tumors [63]. For example, an antibody generated to a mutant EGFR that is fused to Pseudomonas exotoxin A generates an immunotoxin with good affinity, cytotoxicity, and stability [66].

Toxins
Toxins have also been investigated as potential intratumoral therapies. Toxins are generally delivered by convection-enhanced delivery (CED). CED establishes a pressure gradient during interstitial infusion into the brain that allows greater administration of drugs through slow infusion of the drug over a period of several days through stereotactically placed catheters [54, 67]. New methods of drug delivery into the brain using implantable drug-releasing biodegradable microspheres have also been introduced [68]. 131I-TM-601 is a radiolabeled peptide derived from scorpion venom that binds to chloride channels in gliomas, and, although it is well tolerated, no efficacy data are currently available [10]. Transferrin-CRM107, a conjugate of the diphtheria toxin linked to transferrin, has produced tumor response in phase I and II trials without severe toxicity [69].

Two other examples of targeted cytotoxins using Pseudomonas exotoxin are interleukin (IL)-13 fused with Pseudomonas exotoxin (IL13-PE38QQR) and TGF-ß fused with Pseudomonas exotoxin (TP-38). IL13-PE38QQR was safe and produced responses in patients with malignant gliomas in early phase I/II studies [70, 71]. TP-38 targets glioma cells expressing the EGFR [72]. TP-38 was well tolerated, and 20% of patients in a phase I trial had radiographic responses [72]. Similarly, DAB389EGF targets EGFR-overexpressing cells; therefore, clinical trials are planned for the fusion of EGF and diphtheria toxin [67, 73].

Immunotherapy
Cytokines represent another potential therapeutic target for many tumor types (e.g., glioma) because of their immunomodulating effects [41]. TGF-ß2, a cytokine that promotes glioma invasion, angiogenesis, and immunosuppression, is a potential target of GBM therapy [74]. SB-431542 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis), a novel small-molecule inhibitor of the TGF-ßR, prevented glioma growth in preclinical trials [74]. Additionally, AP12009 (Antisense Pharma, Regensburg, Germany), a TGF-ß2 antisense oligonucleotide, produced some antitumor activity and was safe in early clinical trials [10, 74]. Use of IL-4 to target tumors may represent the most clinically viable use of cytokines. Six of nine patients who received IL-4 cytotoxin (IL-4 fused to Pseudomonas exotoxin) had necrosis of their tumors without damage to surrounding tissues [41]. Because of these promising findings, phase II/III trials are under way.


   COMBINATION REGIMENS
Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Glioblastoma Multiforme
 Current Treatment Options for...
 Targeted Agents
 Other Noncytotoxic Targeted...
 Combination Regimens
An Update from the...
 Conclusions and Future...
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Because GBM is an infiltrative disease that is often resistant to treatment, a combination of treatment modalities is likely necessary to achieve the most therapeutic benefit. Indeed, in recent trials, temozolomide plus RT after standard surgery and in newly diagnosed patients without surgery resulted in a significantly longer median survival time and significantly greater 2-year survival rate than with RT alone in patients with GBM [17, 38]. This combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and RT is likely to become the new standard of care until newer, more effective agents are developed. In addition, the combination of two or more anti-tumor agents that have different targets may also become a viable treatment option for GBM. For example, combining patupilone (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation), a microtubule-stabilizing agent; and imatinib mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was associated with a greater antitumor effect than with either therapy alone in a rat glioma model [75]. Moreover, in phase II trials, the combination of paclitaxel (Taxol®; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ), a microtubule-stabilizing agent; topotecan (Hycamtin®; GlaxoSmithKline), a topoisomerase I inhibitor; and filgrastim (Neupogen®; Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) support has resulted in modest activity in adults with recurrent or refractory GBM and anaplastic astrocytoma [76]. Unfortunately, despite filgrastim support, hematologic toxicity was common with this regimen [76].

In addition, many clinical trials that attempt to build on the clinical activity recently described for temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed GBM are either under way or soon to be initiated [17]. For example, the regimen of temozolomide plus irinotecan has been associated with encouraging activity [77].

Because the expression or amplification of various receptors is altered in GBM, agents targeting multiple receptors, such as sorafenib (VEGFR, PDGFR, and Raf kinase inhibitor), PTK787/ZK222584 (VEGFR and PDGFR inhibitor), SU011248 (VEGFR, PDGFR, and c-Kit inhibitor), and AEE788 (VEGFR and EGFR inhibitor), are potentially useful therapeutic combinations. Moreover, combinations of receptor inhibitors with inhibitors of downstream signaling pathways and targets also hold promise for the treatment of GBM. For example, the combination of AEE788, an inhibitor of EGF and VEGFR, and RAD001, an mTOR inhibitor, resulted in more tumor growth inhibition in a mouse glioma model than monotherapy [78]. Kinase inhibitors that target downstream effectors common to multiple upstream receptors may prove to be efficacious in heterogeneous GBM. Furthermore, the addition of anti-angiogenic and intratumoral agents to the overall treatment strategy may provide additional options for the successful treatment of GBM. The combination of endostatin (a direct angiogenesis inhibitor) and SU5416 (Pfizer Pharmaceuticals), a VEGFR inhibitor, has been reported to reduce tumor growth in glioma xenograft models, compared with treatment with either therapy alone [79].

The combination of targeted molecular therapy and RT or chemotherapy is also a promising therapeutic option. Overactivity of the EGFR pathway is associated with resistance to treatment with RT and chemotherapy [10, 80]. Therefore, combining targeted EGFR therapy with RT or chemotherapy may increase the effectiveness of treatment. Indeed, the combination of an EGFR antibody with irradiation in patients with head and neck cancer resulted in superior tumor control and survival compared with irradiation alone [81].However, acute skin reactions were greater in the experimental arm of this study [81].

Thalidomide has also been successfully combined with cytotoxic agents. For example, patients with recurrent GBM treated with a combination of thalidomide and carmustine (BCNU®; Bristol-Myers Squibb) had an objective response rate of 24%, which compared favorably with carmustine treatment alone [38]. Moreover, the combination of thalidomide and temozolomide in patients with GBM was more effective than thalidomide alone with respect to survival, stable disease, and response [82].

Increased expression of COX-2 is associated with angiogenesis and resistance to many cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs [10, 83]. Celecoxib (Celebrex®; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals), a COX-2 inhibitor, enhanced antitumor activity of chemotherapy drugs in vitro and in vivo in prostate tumor cells [83] and has been effectively combined with chemotherapy for patients with recurrent malignant glioma [84]. Moreover, rofecoxib (Vioxx®; Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ), another COX-2 inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy has been shown to be safe in patients with GBM [85].


   AN UPDATE FROM THE 2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Glioblastoma Multiforme
 Current Treatment Options for...
 Targeted Agents
 Other Noncytotoxic Targeted...
 Combination Regimens
 An Update from the...
Conclusions and Future...
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
A number of communications regarding the development of targeted agents for the treatment of GBM were presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO). One of the most interesting reports was a phase II trial investigating enzastaurin for the treatment of patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas [86]. Enzastaurin is a potent and selective inhibitor of PKC-ß, which seems to be of importance in the VEGF signaling cascade; this is particularly important in the context of GBM, in which VEGF appears to be the predominant angiogenic factor. The exposure to enzastaurin was significantly lower in patients treated with enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs (EIADs). Eighty-seven patients were evaluable for response, and 22% of the patients with GBM had objective radiographic responses. Five percent of patients had stable disease, and the overall progression-free survival duration for responders and patients with stable disease was approximately 5 months. One of the main toxicities reported was thrombocytopenia (16% of patients experienced some form of it, and 3% of patients had grade 3–4). Seven patients had intratumoral bleeds, but no deaths occurred. Of these seven patients, six had progressive disease on enzastaurin at the time of the bleed, and one patient was responding. There is a potential association between treatment of fully anticoagulated patients with GBM with enzastaurin and intratumoral hemorrhage.

Imatinib mesylate is another targeted agent for which data were presented at the 2005 ASCO annual meeting. A multicenter phase II study investigated imatinib mesylate in patients with recurrent anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AOD)/mixed oligoastrocytoma (MOA) and anaplastic astrocytoma (AA)/low-grade astrocytoma (LGA). Use of imatinib mesylate as a single agent displayed a good safety profile, but limited activity, in patients with AOD/MOA and AA/LGA [87].

The safety and efficacy of the combination of imatinib mesylate and hydroxyurea was investigated to test the synergy of these agents in patients with recurrent refractory GBM. In one study, the rate of complete response and partial response was 20%, while the clinical benefit rate, including stable disease, was 57%. The progression-free survival rate at 2 years was 16% [88]. In addition, a phase II study to evaluate the activity of imatinib mesylate combined with hydroxyurea for the treatment of patients with recurrent malignant glioma was conducted by Friedman et al. [89]. Nine percent of GBM patients achieved radiographic responses, while 35% achieved stable disease. The median progression-free survival time for patients with recurrent AA/AOD was 10.9 weeks, and for those with GBM, it was 14.4 weeks. The progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 26.3%. Results for the rate of radiographic response, the median progression-free survival time, and the 6-month progression-free survival rate compare favorably with the results seen in the study of temozolomide in first relapse. The greater activity of imatinib mesylate when administered in combinations with hydroxyurea may be due partly to PDGFR inhibition by imatinib mesylate and the antiangiogenic effect of continuous hydroxyurea dosing [88, 89].

The maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of imatinib mesylate in combination with temozolomide was evaluated in a phase I dose-escalation study in patients with malignant glioma [90]. The maximum-tolerated dose has yet to be defined, and to date no dose-limiting toxicity has been observed.

Erlotinib is another targeted agent for which data were reported, including an update of a phase II study presented at the ASCO 2004 annual meeting regarding the use of erlotinib for patients with GBM in first relapse [91]. Of 48 patients, the response rate was 8.4%, and stable disease was observed in 37.5% of patients. The 6-month progression-free survival rate was 17%, and the median survival time was 10 months. Molecular analyses showed a slight trend toward better outcome with EGFR expression, but the sample size was too small for the difference to be significant.

A phase I trial of erlotinib with RT in patients with GBM determined the toxicity and maximum-tolerated dose [92]. The median time to progression was 161 days, and the median survival time was 386 days. Thirteen patients were evaluable for best objective response (nine had stable disease, one had no evidence of disease, and three had early progression). Preliminary data suggest that the concomitant administration of erlotinib plus RT is well tolerated.

The combination of erlotinib with temozolomide and concurrent RT in a phase II study enrolling patients with newly diagnosed GBM was presented [93]. The best response evaluated was stable disease (10.5 months, 7 months, and 3.5+ months’ duration). No grade 4 toxicities were observed, and grade 3 adverse events included neutropenia and lymphopenia. These observations suggest that the combination of erlotinib with RT and temozolomide appears to be feasible and, in general, well tolerated.

Treatment with gefitinib for adult patients with progressive high-grade gliomas (HGGs) was investigated in an open-label, single-arm, phase II study by the Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia (GICNO) [94].Adult patients with histologically confirmed high-grade gliomas recurring after first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Of 16 patients with GBM, one patient had an unconfirmed partial response, five patients had confirmed stable disease, and three patients had unconfirmed stable disease. Adverse events included grade 3 diarrhea and neutropenia and grade 4 acute pulmonary edema, pulmonary thromboembolism, and CNS hemorrhage. In the GBM subgroup of patients, the disease-control rate was 12.5%, and the median time to progression was 60 days. Both at 6 and 12 months, the rate of progression-free survival was 12.5%. The median overall survival duration was 172 days, and the rates of overall survival at 6 and 12 months were 50% and 14.3%, respectively. These results suggest that gefitinib may be active as a second-line treatment in patients with HGG.

Data from a phase I trial of gefitinib in combination with rapamycin for the treatment of patients with recurrent malignant glioma were also presented [95]. Another phase I study evaluated the safety of escalating doses of atrasentan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma [96]. Atrasentan is a highly potent and selective endothelin A receptor agonist that may inhibit cell proliferation by blocking the endothelin A receptor that regulates the angiogenesis involved in glioma growth. The maximum-tolerated dose was determined to be 70 mg per day. Twenty-three patients were evaluable for toxicity; the most common adverse events were rhinitis, headache, and peripheral edema; myelosuppression was not observed. One patient had a partial response, one patient had an unconfirmed partial response, and four patients had stable disease before progressing. The median survival time was 6 months, and the median progression-free survival time was 1.5 months. The observed 6-month progression-free survival rate was comparable with historical data.

Data from the N997B phase II trial of temsirolimus in patients with GBM and with one prior chemotherapy regimen for progressive disease or less were reported [97]. Temsirolimus was shown to be well tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM. Radiographic response in patients treated with temsirolimus was associated with a significantly longer progression-free survival time. Results suggested that the development of grade =2 hyperlipidemia appears to be a surrogate marker of radiographic improvement. High levels of phosphorylated p70s6 kinase, as determined by immunohistochemistry in baseline tumor samples, appear to be able to predict which patients are most likely to benefit from treatment.

Final results of a phase I/II study of IL13-PE38QQR administered intratumorally and/or peritumorally via CED in patients undergoing tumor resection for recurrent malignant glioma showed that, for patients with GBM who are undergoing tumor resection, CED of IL13-PE38QQR is associated with a favorable risk-to-benefit profile [98].


   CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Glioblastoma Multiforme
 Current Treatment Options for...
 Targeted Agents
 Other Noncytotoxic Targeted...
 Combination Regimens
 An Update from the...
 Conclusions and Future...
Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Infiltration of tumor cells into the surrounding brain may be responsible for the refractory nature of GBM to treatment [99]. Indeed, surgical treatments are only palliative in nature and not curative. Moreover, the blood–brain barrier represents a significant obstacle for most antiglioma drugs. For example, the delivery of large-molecular-weight polar compounds, such as proteins, has proven to be especially challenging. In addition, the brain is highly sensitive to cytotoxic treatments, and venous thromboembolism commonly affects patients receiving treatment for cerebral tumors [100]. The frequency of spontaneous intracerebral hematomas in patients with intracranial neoplasms in a recent study was 2%, and 30% of those were related to GBM [101].

Another challenge for the successful treatment of GBM is the diversity of cell types and mutations in the tumor. These tumors are composed of highly heterogeneous cell populations that are often characterized by high chemoresistance [20]. Furthermore, because a variety of genes may be mutated or overexpressed in different areas of the tumors, no one treatment is likely to destroy the tumor. Although significant progress has been made, further elucidation of signaling pathways responsible for the malignant phenotype of GBM will represent a significant advance in the field. Once tumors can be more accurately classified by mutations, treatment regimens can be tailored to individual tumors. It is likely that the most effective treatments will combine traditional interventions such as surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy with the newer targeted therapies.

Development of DNA- and RNA-based therapies represents a future direction for GBM therapy. Although the use of gene therapy is still in the experimental stages, it is a promising new area of research. Theoretically, gene therapy strategies can be designed on the basis of unique cytogenic and molecular characteristics of the tumor and can improve the selectivity and safety of treatment [102]. Similarly, antisense therapy is a promising new treatment strategy that is currently under investigation. Several genes, including TGF-ß, bFGF, EGFR-1, VEGF, telomerase, topoisomerase II ß subunit, PKC-ß, and microtubule-associated protein 1A have been targeted by antisense technology in glioma cells [103].

Therapeutic vaccination of patients with cancer also represents an encouraging experimental approach to treating malignant gliomas [103]. Antigen-presenting dendritic cells are designed to potently stimulate antitumor T-cell responses that in turn destroy the tumor [104]. A recent phase I study demonstrated the ability of a tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell vaccine to generate antigen-specific cytotoxicity in patients with GBM and anaplastic astrocytoma [104].

In summary, recent therapeutic approaches are based on a greater understanding of the molecular and cellular biology of GBM. Some of the new cytostatic and noncytotoxic targeted agents currently under investigation may eventually add to the armamentarium of agents that can be used in combination with surgery, RT, and conventional cytotoxic agents for improved treatment of patients with GBM.


   DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Glioblastoma Multiforme
 Current Treatment Options for...
 Targeted Agents
 Other Noncytotoxic Targeted...
 Combination Regimens
 An Update from the...
 Conclusions and Future...
 Disclosure of Potential...
References
 
Patrick Wen and David Reardon have acted as a consultant for Schering-Plough and Novartis. David Reardon indicated a financial interest.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Glioblastoma Multiforme
 Current Treatment Options for...
 Targeted Agents
 Other Noncytotoxic Targeted...
 Combination Regimens
 An Update from the...
 Conclusions and Future...
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure Foundation (ABC2) and the Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation for their support of preclinical studies with molecular targeted therapies, and the William Markos Brain Tumor Research Fund.


   REFERENCES
Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Glioblastoma Multiforme
 Current Treatment Options for...
 Targeted Agents
 Other Noncytotoxic Targeted...
 Combination Regimens
 An Update from the...
 Conclusions and Future...
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 

  1. Brandes AA. State-of-the-art treatment of high-grade brain tumors. Semin Oncol 2003;30(suppl 19):4–9.
  2. Grossman SA, Batara JF. Current management of glioblastoma multiforme. Semin Oncol 2004;31:635–644.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Uddin S, Jarmi T, Hariharan S. Glioblastoma multiforme. Available at http://www.emedicine.com/NEURO/topic147.htm. Accessed March 15, 2005.
  4. Kleihues P, Burger PC, Scheithauer BW. The new WHO classification of brain tumours. Brain Pathol 1993;3:255–268.[Medline]
  5. DeAngelis LM. Chemotherapy for brain tumors--a new beginning. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1036–1038.[Free Full Text]
  6. Sandberg-Wollheim M, Malmstrom P, Stromblad LG et al. A randomized study of chemotherapy with procarbazine, vincristine, and lomustine with and without radiation therapy for astrocytoma grades 3 and/or 4. Cancer 1991;68:22–29.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Walker MD, Green SB, Byar DP et al. Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and nitrosoureas for the treatment of malignant glioma after surgery. N Engl J Med 1980;303:1323–1329.[Abstract]
  8. Tysnes BB, Mahesparan R. Biological mechanisms of glioma invasion and potential therapeutic targets. J Neurooncol 2001;53:129–147.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Benjamin R, Capparella J, Brown A. Classification of glioblastoma multiforme in adults by molecular genetics. Cancer J 2003;9:82–90.[Medline]
  10. Kesari S, Ramakrishna N, Sauvageot C et al. Targeted molecular therapy of malignant gliomas. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2005;5:186–197.[Medline]
  11. Ohgaki H. Genetic pathways to glioblastomas. Neuropatholology 2005;25:1–7.
  12. Walker MD, Alexander E Jr, Hunt WE et al. Evaluation of BCNU and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. A cooperative clinical trial. J Neurosurg 1978;49:333–343.[Medline]
  13. Carpentier A. Neuro-oncology: The growing role of chemotherapy in glioma. Lancet Neurol 2005;4:4–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Fine HA, Dear KB, Loeffler JS et al. Meta-analysis of radiation therapy with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adults. Cancer 1993;71:2585–2597.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Stewart LA. Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomized trials. Lancet 2002;359:1011–1018.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Sipos L, Vitanovics D, Afra D. Temozolomide chemotherapy of patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas. Ideggyogy Sz 2004;57:394–399.[Medline]
  17. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005;352:987–996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Friedman HS, McLendon RE, Kerby T et al. DNA mismatch repair and O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase analysis and response to Temodal in newly diagnosed malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 1998;16: 3851–3857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Godard S et al. Clinical trial substantiates the predictive value of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:1871–1874.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Jendrossek V, Belka C, Bamberg M. Novel chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2003;12:1899–1924.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Kuan CT, Wikstrand CJ, Bigner DD. EGF mutant receptor vIII as a molecular target in cancer therapy. Endocr Relat Cancer 2001;8:83–96.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Rich JN, Reardon DA, Peery T et al. Phase II trial of gefitinib in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:133–142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Lieberman FS, Cloughesy T, Fine H et al. NABTC phase I/II trial of ZD-1839 for recurrent malignant gliomas and unresectable meningiomas. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Prados MD, Langorn KR, Chang S et al. Phase I study of erlotinib alone and combined with temozolomide in patients with stable or recurrent glioma. Neuro-Oncology 2005;8:67–78.
  25. Vogelbaum MA, Peereboom D, Stevens G et al. Phase II trial of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib for single agent therapy of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: Interim results. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1558a.
  26. Raizer JJ, Abrey LE, Wen P et al. A phase II trial of erlotinib (OSI-774) in patients (pts) with recurrent malignant gliomas (MG) not on EIAEDs. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1502a.
  27. Marie Y, Carpentier AF, Omuro AM et al. EGFR tyrosine kinase domain mutations in human gliomas. Neurology 2005;64:1444–1445.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Haas-Kojan DA, Prados MD, Tihan T et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor, protein kinase B/Akt, and glioma response to erlotinib. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:880–887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Spector NL, Xia W, Burris H 3rd et al. Study of the biological effects of lapatinib, a reversible inhibitor of ErbB1 and ErbB2 tyrosine kinases, on tumor growth and survival pathways in patients with advanced malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2502–2512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Traxler P, Allegrini PR, Brandt R et al. AEE788: a dual family epidermal growth factor receptor/ErbB2 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumor and antiangiogenic activity. Cancer Res 2004;64:4931–4941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Wen PY, Yung W, Lamborn K et al. Phase I/II study of imatinib mesylate (STI571) for patients with recurrent malignant gliomas (NABTC 99-08). Poster presented at the Society for Neuro-Oncology 9th Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada, November 18–21, 2004.
  32. Raymond E, Brandes A, Van Oosterom A et al. Multicentre phase II study of imatinib mesylate in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: An EORTC: NDDG/BTG Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1501a.
  33. Holdhoff M, Kreuzer KA, Appelt C et al. Imatinib mesylate radiosensitizes human glioblastoma cells through inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor receptor. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2005;34:181–185.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Roberts WG, Whalen PM, Soderstrome E et al. Antiangiogenic and anti-tumor activity of a selective PDGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, CP-673, 451. Cancer Res 2005;65:957–966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Goldbrunner RH, Bendszus M, Wood J et al. PTK787/ZK222584, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, decreases glioma growth and vascularization. Neurosurgery 2004;55:426–432.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Strumberg D, Richly H, Hilger RA et al. Phase I clinical and pharmaco-kinetic study of the novel Raf kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor BAY 43-9006 in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:965–972.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Fine HA, Figg WD, Jaeckle K et al. Phase II trial of the antiangiogenic agent thalidomide in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:708–715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Fine HA, Wen PY, Maher EA et al. Phase II trial of thalidomide and carmustine for patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2299–2304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Taga T, Suzuki A, Gonzalez-Gomez I et al. alpha v-Integrin antagonist EMD 121974 induces apoptosis in brain tumor cells growing on vitronectin and tenascin. Int J Cancer 2002;98:690–697.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Keyes KA, Mann L, Sherman M et al. LY317615 decreases plasma VEGF levels in human tumor xenograft-bearing mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2004;53:133–140.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Prasad G, Wang H, Hill DL et al. Recent advances in experimental molecular therapeutics for malignant gliomas. Curr Med Chem Anti-Canc Agents 2004;4:347–361.[CrossRef]
  42. Nelson JB. Endothelin receptor antagonists. World J Urol 2005;23:19–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Tohnya TM, Ng SS, Dahut WL et al. A phase I study of oral CC-5013 (lenalidomide, Revlimid), a thalidomide derivative, in patients with refractory metastatic cancer. Clin Prostate Cancer 2004;2:241–243.[Medline]
  44. New P. Cyclooxygenase in the treatment of glioma: its complex role in signal transduction. Cancer Control 2004;11:152–164.[Medline]
  45. Barnett FH, Scharer-Schuksz M, Wood M et al. Intra-arterial delivery of endostatin gene to brain tumors prolongs survival and alters tumor vessel ultrastructure. Gene Ther 2004;11:1283–1289.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Farhadi MR, Capelle HH, Erber R et al. Combined inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor signaling: effects on the angiogenesis, microcirculation, and growth of orthotopic malignant gliomas. J Neurosurg 2005;102:363–370.
  47. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2335–2342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Stark-Vance V. Bevacizumab and CPT-11 in the treatment of relapsed malignant glioma. Neurooncol 2005;7:369.
  49. Newton HB. Molecular neuro-oncology and development of targeted therapeutic strategies for brain tumors. Part 1: Growth factor and Ras signaling pathways. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2003;3:595–614.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Cloughesy TF, Kuhn J, Wen P et al. Two phase II trials of R115777 (Zarnestra®) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a comparison of patients on enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs (EIAED) and not on EIAED at maximum tolerated dose respectively: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium (NABTC) Report. Neurooncol 2003;5:349.
  51. Caponigro F, Casale M, Bryce J. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors in clinical development. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2003;12:943–954.[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Nakamura JL, Karlsson A, Arvold ND et al. PKB/Akt mediates radiosensitization by the signaling inhibitor LY294002 in human malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol 2005;71:215–222.[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Newton HB. Molecular neuro-oncology and development of targeted therapeutic strategies for brain tumors. Part 2: PI3K/Akt/PTEN, mTOR, SHH/PTCH and angiogenesis. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2004;4: 105–128.[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Mrugala MM, Kesari S, Ramakrishna N et al. Therapy for recurrent malignant glioma in adults. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2004;4: 759–782.[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Chang SM, Kuhn J, Wen P et al. Phase I/pharmacokinetic study of CCI-779 in patients with recurrent malignant glioma on enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs. Invest New Drugs 2004;22:427–435.[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Chang SM, Wen P, Cloughesy T et al. Phase II study of CCI-779 in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Invest New Drugs 2005;23: 357–361.[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Tremont-Lukats IW, Gilbert MR. Advances in molecular therapies in patients with brain tumors. Cancer Control 2003;10:125–137.[Medline]
  58. Yin D, Zhou H, Kumagai T et al. Proteasome inhibitor PS-341 causes cell growth arrest and apoptosis in human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Oncogene 2005;24:344–354.[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Marks P, Rifkind RA, Richon VM et al. Histone deacetylases and cancer: causes and therapies. Nat Rev Cancer 2001;1:194–202.[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Chalmers A, Johnston P, Woodcock M et al. PARP-1, PARP-2, and the cellular response to low doses of ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;58:410–419.[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Robe PA, Bentires-Alj M, Bonif M et al. In vitro and in vivo activity of the nuclear factor-kappaB inhibitor sulfasalazine in human glioblastomas. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:5595–5603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Fujita M, Mizuno M, Nagasaka T et al. Aurora-B dysfunction of multi-nucleated giant cells in glioma detected by site-specific phosphorylated antibodies. J Neurosurg 2004;101:1012–1017.[Medline]
  63. Mischel PS, Cloughesy TF. Targeted molecular therapy of GBM. Brain Pathol 2003;13:52–61.[Medline]
  64. Jungbluth AA, Stockert E, Huang HJ et al. A monoclonal antibody recognizing human cancers with amplification/overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:639–644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Quang TS, Brady LW. Radioimmunotherapy as a novel treatment regimen: 125I-labeled monoclonal antibody 425 in the treatment of high-grade brain gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;58:972–975.[CrossRef][Medline]
  66. Lorimer IA, Keppler-Hafkemeyer A, Beers RA et al. Recombinant immunotoxins specific for a mutant epidermal growth factor receptor: targeting with a single chain antibody variable domain isolated by phage display. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:14815–14820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Cohen KA, Liu T, Bissonette R et al. DAB389EGF fusion protein therapy of refractory glioblastoma multiforme. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2003;4:39–49.[CrossRef][Medline]
  68. Menei P, Jadaud E, Faisant N et al. Stereotaxic implantation of 5-fluorouracil-releasing microspheres in malignant glioma. Cancer 2004;100:405–410.[CrossRef][Medline]
  69. Weaver M, Laske DW. Transferrin receptor ligand-targeted toxin conjugate (Tf-CRM107) for therapy of malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol 2003;65:3–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
  70. Kunwar S. Convection enhanced delivery of IL13-PE38QQR for treatment of recurrent malignant glioma: presentation of interim findings from ongoing phase 1 studies. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2003;88:105–111.
  71. Kunwar S, Prados M, Chang S et al. Peritumoral convection-enhanced delivery of IL-13-PE38QQR in patients with recurrent malignant glioma--phase I interim results. Neurooncol 2003;5:350.
  72. Sampson JH, Akabani G, Archer GE et al. Progress report of a phase I study of the intracerebral microinfusion of a recombinant chimeric protein composed of transforming growth factor (TGF)-alpha and a mutated form of the Pseudomonas exotoxin termed PE-38 (TP-38) for the treatment of malignant brain tumors. J Neurooncol 2003;65:27–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
  73. Liu TF, Hall PD, Cohen KA et al. Interstitial diphtheria toxin-epidermal growth factor fusion protein therapy produces regressions of subcutaneous human glioblastoma multiforme tumors in athymic nude mice. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:329–334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Hjelmeland MD, Hjelmeland AB, Sathornsumetee S et al. SB-431542, a small molecule transforming growth factor-beta-receptor antagonist, inhibits human glioma cell line proliferation and motility. Mol Cancer Ther 2004;3:737–745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. O’Reilly T, Wartmann M, Maira SM et al. Patupilone (epothilone B, EPO906) and imatinib (STI571, Glivec) in combination display enhanced antitumour activity in vivo against experimental rat C6 glioma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2005;55:307–317.[CrossRef][Medline]
  76. Pipas JM, Meyer LP, Rhodes CH et al. A phase II trial of paclitaxel and topotecan with filgrastim in patients with recurrent or refractory glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic astrocytoma. J Neurooncol 2005;71: 301–305.[CrossRef][Medline]
  77. Reardon DA, Quinn JA, Rich JN et al. Phase I trial of irinotecan plus temozolomide in adults with recurrent malignant glioma. Cancer 2005;104:1478–1486.[CrossRef][Medline]
  78. Goudar RK, Shi Q, Hjelmeland MD et al. Combination therapy of inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (AEE788) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (RAD001) offers improved glioblastoma tumor growth inhibition. Mol Cancer Ther 2005;4:101–112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Abdollahi A, Lipson KE, Sckell A et al. Combined therapy with direct and indirect angiogenesis inhibition results in enhanced antiangiogenic and antitumor effects. Cancer Res 2003;63:8890–8898.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Chakravarti A, Dicker A, Mehta M. The contribution of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway to radioresistance in human gliomas: a review of preclinical and correlative clinical data. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;58:927–931.[CrossRef][Medline]
  81. Baumann M, Krause M. Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor in radiotherapy: radiobiological mechanisms, preclinical and clinical results. Radiother Oncol 2004;72:257–266.[CrossRef][Medline]
  82. Baumann F, Bjeljac M, Kollias SS et al. Combined thalidomide and temozolomide treatment in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 2004;67:191–200.[CrossRef][Medline]
  83. Dandekar DS, Lopez M, Carey RI et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib augments chemotherapeutic drug-induced apoptosis by enhancing activation of caspase-3 and -9 in prostate cancer cells. Int J Cancer 2005;115:484–492.[CrossRef][Medline]
  84. Reardon DA, Quinn JA, Vredenburgh J et al. Phase II trial of irinotecan plus celecoxib in adults with recurrent malignant glioma. Cancer 2005;103:329–338.[CrossRef][Medline]
  85. Tuettenberg J, Grobholz R, Korn T et al. Continuous low-dose chemotherapy plus inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 as an antiangiogenic therapy of glioblastoma multiforme. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2005;131:31–40.[CrossRef][Medline]
  86. Fine HA, Kim L, Royce C et al. Results from phase II trial of enzastaurin (LY317615) in patients with recurrent high grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1504a.
  87. van den Bent M, Brandes A, Frenay M et al. Multicentre phase II study of imatinib mesylate (Glivec®) in patients with recurrent anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AOD)/mixed oligoastrocytoma (MOA) and anaplastic astrocytoma (AA)/low grade astrocytoma (LGA): an EORTC New Drug Development Group (NDDG) and Brain Tumor Group (BTG) study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1501a.
  88. Dresemann G. Imatinib and hydroxyurea in pretreated progressive glioblastoma multiforme: a patient series. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1702–1708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  89. Friedman HS, Quinn J, Rich J et al. Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) plus hydroxyurea is an effective regimen in the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma. Phase 2 study results. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1515a.
  90. Sathornsumetee S, Reardon DA, Quinn J et al. Phase I dose escalation study of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) plus standard-dosed temozolomide in the treatment of patients with malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1540a.
  91. Cloughesy T, Yung A, Vrendenberg J et al. Phase II study of erlotinib in recurrent GBM: molecular predictors of outcome. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1507a.
  92. Krishnan S, Brown P, Ballman K et al. Phase I trial of erlotinib with radiation therapy (RT) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1513a.
  93. Brewer CJ, Suh JH, Stevens GH et al. Phase II trial of erlotinib with temozolomide and concurrent radiation therapy in patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma multiformeJ Clin Oncol 2005;23:1567a.
  94. Franceschi E, Lonardi S, Tosoni A et al. ZD1839 (Iressa) treatment for adult patients with progressive high-grade gliomas (HGG): an open label, single-arm, phase II study of the Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia (GICNO). J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1564a.
  95. Rich JN, Reardon DA, Quinn JA et al. A phase I trial of gefitinib (Iressa; ZD1839) plus rapamycin for patients with recurrent malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1565a.
  96. Phuphanich S, Carson K, Grossman S et al. A phase I evaluation of the safety of escalating doses of atrasentan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma (MG). J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1526a.
  97. Galanis E, Buckner JC, Maurer MJ et al. N997B: Phase II trial of CCI-779 in recurrent glioblastoma mutiforme (GBM): updated results and correlative laboratory analysis. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1505a.
  98. Prados M, Kunwar S, Lang FF et al. Final results of phase I/II studies of IL13-PE38QQR administered intratumorally (IT) and/or peritumorally (PT) via convection-enhanced delivery (CED) in patients undergoing tumor resection for recurrent malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1506a.
  99. Lassman AB. Molecular biology of gliomas. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2004;4:228–233.[Medline]
  100. Walsh DC, Kakkar AK. Thromboembolism in brain tumors. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2001;7:326–331.[CrossRef][Medline]
  101. Schrader B, Barth H, Lang EW et al. Spontaneous intracranial haematomas caused by neoplasms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000;142:979–985.[CrossRef][Medline]
  102. Lawler SE, Peruzzi PP, Chiocca EA. Genetic strategies for brain tumor therapy. Cancer Gene Therapy 2005 (epub ahead of print).
  103. Matsuno A, Nagashima T. Specific gene suppression using antisense strategy for growth suppression of glioma. Med Electron Microsc 2004;37:158–161.[Medline]
  104. Wheeler CJ, Black KL. Dendritic cell vaccines and obstacles to beneficial immunity in glioma patients. Curr Opin Mol Ther 2005;7:35–47.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Neuro OncologyHome page
P. C. De Witt Hamer
Small molecule kinase inhibitors in glioblastoma: a systematic review of clinical studies
Neuro Oncology, February 9, 2010; (2010) nop068v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Neuro OncologyHome page
E. L. Kim, R. Wustenberg, A. Rubsam, C. Schmitz-Salue, G. Warnecke, E.-M. Bucker, N. Pettkus, D. Speidel, V. Rohde, W. Schulz-Schaeffer, et al.
Chloroquine activates the p53 pathway and induces apoptosis in human glioma cells
Neuro Oncology, January 27, 2010; (2010): nop046v1 - nop046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
J. F. Dorsey, A. Mintz, X. Tian, M. L. Dowling, J. P. Plastaras, D. T. Dicker, G. D. Kao, and W. S. El-Deiry
Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and paclitaxel have cooperative in vivo effects against glioblastoma multiforme cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2009; 8(12): 3285 - 3295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Occup Med (Lond)Home page
L. Calvio, M. Feuerstein, J. Hansen, and G. M. Luff
Cognitive limitations in occupationally active malignant brain tumour survivors
Occup. Med., September 1, 2009; 59(6): 406 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Cancer ResHome page
G. Karpel-Massler, U. Schmidt, A. Unterberg, and M.-E. Halatsch
Therapeutic Inhibition of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in High-Grade Gliomas: Where Do We Stand?
Mol. Cancer Res., July 1, 2009; 7(7): 1000 - 1012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Neuro OncologyHome page
J. J. Vredenburgh, A. Desjardins, D. A. Reardon, and H. S. Friedman
Experience with irinotecan for the treatment of malignant glioma
Neuro Oncology, February 1, 2009; 11(1): 80 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
D. A. Reardon, K. L. Fink, T. Mikkelsen, T. F. Cloughesy, A. O'Neill, S. Plotkin, M. Glantz, P. Ravin, J. J. Raizer, K. M. Rich, et al.
Randomized Phase II Study of Cilengitide, an Integrin-Targeting Arginine-Glycine-Aspartic Acid Peptide, in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2008; 26(34): 5610 - 5617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
W. P. Mason and J. G. Cairncross
Invited Article: The expanding impact of molecular biology on the diagnosis and treatment of gliomas
Neurology, July 29, 2008; 71(5): 365 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Diehn, C. Nardini, D. S. Wang, S. McGovern, M. Jayaraman, Y. Liang, K. Aldape, S. Cha, and M. D. Kuo
From the Cover: Identification of noninvasive imaging surrogates for brain tumor gene-expression modules
PNAS, April 1, 2008; 105(13): 5213 - 5218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The OncologistHome page
F. Lefranc, V. Facchini, and R. Kiss
Proautophagic Drugs: A Novel Means to Combat Apoptosis-Resistant Cancers, with a Special Emphasis on Glioblastomas
Oncologist, December 1, 2007; 12(12): 1395 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
R. E. Brown and A. Law
Morphoproteomic Demonstration of Constitutive Nuclear Factor-kappaB Activation in Glioblastoma Multiforme with Genomic Correlates and Therapeutic Implications
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2006; 36(4): 421 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reardon, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, P. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reardon, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, P. Y.

HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS