help button home button The Oncologist http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/misc/eLetters.shtml
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Oncologist, Vol. 11, No. 5, 531-532, May 2006; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.11-5-531
© 2006 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. K.

Letter to the Editor

In Reply

Deborah K. Armstrong

Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Correspondence: Deborah K. Armstrong, M.D., The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Bunting Blaustein Cancer Research Building, Room 190, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA. Telephone: 410-614-2743; Fax: 410-955-0125; e-mail: darmstro{at}jhmi.edu

Received March 10, 2006; accepted for publication April 3, 2006.

I appreciate the letter and information from Dr. Muggia [1]. As he notes, their group has a long history studying the use of topotecan as a continuous infusion in the treatment of ovarian cancer. In the past, the requirement for cumbersome infusion devices made this a less appealing approach. However, as indicated, advances in biotechnology allow for easier infusion using this approach, which continues to be under investigation. Of note, an oral formulation of topotecan is currently under investigation [2, 3]. It is hypothesized that continuous oral dosing of topotecan may have similar pharmacokinetics to and possibly the beneficial antitumor effects of continuous infusion i.v. topotecan. This remains an active area of investigation.


    DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
 Top
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
The author indicates no potential conflicts of interest.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 

  1. Muggia F, Kosloff R, Liebes L et al. Topotecan Continuous Infusion: CA-125 Responses Including Patients Pretreated with Other Schedules of Topotecan. The Oncologist 2006;11:529–531.[Free Full Text]
  2. Rose PG, Markman M, Bell JG et al. Sequential prolonged oral topotecan and prolonged oral etoposide as second-line therapy in ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma: a phase I Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2006 Jan 10; [Epub ahead of print].
  3. Gore M, Oza A, Rustin G et al. A randomised trial of oral versus intravenous topotecan in patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 2002;38:57–63.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. K.


HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS
http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/subscriptions/etoc.dtl