Advertisement

help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Oncologist, Vol. 11, No. 7, 780-789, July 2006; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.11-7-780
© 2006 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wanko, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by de Castro, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wanko, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by de Castro, C.

The Community Oncologist: Duke Oncology Fellows Series

Hairy Cell Leukemia: An Elusive but Treatable Disease

Sam O. Wanko, Carlos de Castro

Duke University Medical Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology & Bone Marrow Transplant, Durham, North Carolina, USA

Key Words. Hairy cell leukemia • Chronic leukemia • Aplastic anemia • Cladribine • Pentostatin

Correspondence: Sam O. Wanko, M.D., Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3841, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Telephone: 919-684-2287; Fax: 919-684-3309; e-mail: sam.wanko{at}duke.edu

Received January 31, 2006; accepted for publication May 26, 2006.


    LEARNING OBJECTIVES
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
After completing this course, the reader will be able to:

  1. Describe what is known about the biology and pathogenesis of HCL.
  2. Discuss the clinical presentation and differential diagnosis of HCL.
  3. Identify important diagnostic markers for HCL.
  4. Discuss treatment options and response and adverse effects to therapy for HCL.

Access and take the CME test online and receive 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM at CME.TheOncologist.com


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a unique chronic lymphoproliferative disorder that can mimic or coexist with other clonal hematologic disorders and has been associated with autoimmune disorders. It should be entertained as an alternative diagnosis in patients with cytopenias being assigned the diagnosis of aplastic anemia, hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndrome, atypical chronic lymphocytic leukemia, B-prolymphocytic leukemia, or idiopathic myelofibrosis. Causative etiology or molecular defects remain unclear, although nonspecific chromosomal and molecular changes have been described. The typical presentation is that of a middle-aged man with an incidental finding of pancytopenia, splenomegaly, and inaspirable bone marrow. Treatment with a purine analogue, cladribine or pentostatin, results in extremely high, durable, overall, and complete response rates, although resistance and relapses do occur. A variant subtype exists and is frequently associated with a poor response. Because of its simplified dosing schedule, cladribine is commonly used as the initial therapy. Treatment of relapsed HCL is dictated by the duration of the preceding remission. Relapsed disease after a prolonged remission can often be successfully retreated with the same initial agent. Resistance in typical HCL is treated with the alternate purine analogue. New agents, such as rituximab and BL22, are actively being evaluated and show promising results in both HCL subtypes. This article uses two patients diagnosed with aplastic anemia and recently seen in consultation at our institution as a springboard to discuss the biology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options of HCL.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a unique chronic lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by cytoplasmic villous (hairy) projections and diffuse infiltration of the bone marrow and spleen [1], leading to peripheral cytopenia and splenomegaly. Circulating hairy cells may be present. Historically, HCL was first described in 1920 and called by various names, including leukemic reticuloendotheliosis, histiocytic leukemia, malignant reticulosis, and lymphoid myelofibrosis. It was further characterized in 1958 by Bouroncle and colleagues [2] as a unique entity with distinct histopathologic and clinical characteristics. Based on the microscopic observation of their hair-like cytoplasmic projections, Schrek and Donnelly [3] coined the term hairy cell in 1966. HCL makes up 2% of all leukemias, with 600 new cases in the U.S. per year [4]. The median age at diagnosis is 55 years, and there is 5:1 male preponderance [5, 6]. A variant form (HCL-V), which differs both morphologically and in clinical behavior, makes up 10%–20% of cases [4, 7 ,8]. Among the chronic leukemias, HCL is frequently misdiagnosed but interestingly represents one of the most successfully treated leukemias when the appropriate diagnosis is made. Thus, recognizing its features and considering it in the differential diagnosis under the right clinical setting is crucial. This review introduces two recent consultation cases seen at our institution and uses them as a springboard to discuss the biology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options of HCL.


    CASE PRESENTATION
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Patient A is a 46-year-old female attorney with a history of stable psoriasis who was incidentally found to have pancytopenia during an annual physical examination 4 years earlier, with a WBC of 1,700/3l, hemoglobin level of 11.0 g/dl, and platelet count of 109,000/3l. She had mild easy fatigability and an incident of opportunistic pox infection of her left finger several months prior to discovering her pancytopenia. Her social history is important for owning and operating a farm, where she also lives. As a result, she had exposure to insecticides, fuel, kerosene, and other farm chemicals. Initial physical examination was unremarkable. During the intervening 4 years, she sought care in both a private and an academic medical center, where extensive laboratory evaluation was apparently normal. Her initial bone marrow biopsy and aspirate demonstrated 30%–40% cellularity and a decreased myeloid to erythroid (M:E) ratio but appropriate maturation without a clonal population. A second bone marrow biopsy and aspirate 2 years later was difficult to aspirate and had 30% cellularity and a decreased M:E ratio but appropriate maturation and no detectable clonal population. There were lymphocyte aggregates in the marrow that were not further defined. Flow cytometry and cytogenetics were not available at the time of our consult. Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) tests were negative on the two bone marrow evaluations. A diagnosis of aplastic anemia was rendered, with a plan to start immunosuppressive therapy when she progressed to severe aplastic anemia. Over time, her peripheral count decreased but without infectious complications or transfusion requirement.

Two months prior to consulting us, she had been diagnosed and surgically treated for stage III right invasive breast cancer. The consult question was how to manage her aplastic anemia in order to safely provide the needed adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation. On examination, she had splenomegaly, which was confirmed on computed tomography (CT) scan, but no lymphadenopathy. Peripheral blood flow cytometry showed 5% abnormal lymphocytes consistent with HCL, based on immunophenotypic findings of positive CD19, CD20, CD22, CD25, CD103, and {kappa} surface immunoglobulin (SIg) and negative CD10 and CD5. Repeat bone marrow biopsy and aspirate showed 50% cellularity with 40% hairy cell involvement.

Patient B was 65 years old in 2003 when he also was incidentally found to have a WBC of 2,000/3l, mild anemia with a hemoglobin level of 12.7 g/dl (normal range, 13.7–17.3), and a normal platelet count during an annual primary care evaluation. He had no antecedent infections and no other significant past medical history. He is an army veteran who had served in Vietnam with an apparent exposure to Agent Orange. His physical examination was normal. He was referred to hematology, where a bone marrow aspirate and biopsy showed 5%–10% cellularity with no spicules on the aspirate. Flow cytometry and morphology were unremarkable, and fibrosis was absent. Cytogenetics showed a normal karyotype. An abdominal CT scan was negative for splenomegaly or lymphadenopathy. PNH, B12, and other laboratory data were negative. He was subsequently diagnosed with aplastic anemia and, as his counts declined, he began treatment with combined antithymocyte globulin (ATG), cyclosporine, and steroids without response. We saw him in consultation for a second opinion. His physical examination and other laboratory evaluation were unremarkable. His bone marrow biopsy and aspirate showed 30% cellularity with 70% HCL involvement. There was mild dyserythropoiesis noted. Flow cytometric analysis of the marrow sample was positive for pan B-cell antigens and HCL-specific immunophenotype—CD 103, CD11c, and CD25.


    BIOLOGY AND PATHOGENESIS
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
An in-depth review of the biology and pathogenesis of HCL is beyond the scope of this article. Nonetheless, hairy cells are distinct, activated, clonal proliferating B cells that are arrested at a late stage of maturation [911]. HCL shows features of activated cells, with strong expression of light-chain-restricted SIg, expression of multiple clonally related heavy-chain isotypes, VH gene mutation, and expression of mature B-cell CD markers [12, 13]. In contrast to the suggestion by some investigators that hairy cells originate from the germinal center or naïve B cells, gene-expression profile data by Basso et al. [9] strongly suggest that hairy cells arise or are related to memory B cells. In addition, that group identified a set of 89 genes that are specifically overexpressed or downregulated in patients with HCL and might account for HCL propagation as well as its distinct functional features such as the hairy morphology, bone marrow fibrosis, and its response to cytokine treatment [10].

Despite these advances, the actual oncogenic events driving its development remain unclear. Numerous but inconsistent chromosomal and genetic abnormalities have been reported in HCL and include trisomy 5, trisomy 12, and deletion or mutation of p53 [1214]. In their series, Vallianatou and colleagues [8] reported loss or deletion of p53 in 75% and 100% of patients with typical and variant HCL, respectively, while trisomy 12 was found in about 8% of each hairy cell subtype. bcl-6 mutations occur in 25% of HCL cases, while overexpression of cyclin D1 (BCL-1 or PRAD-1) has been reported [15]. Interestingly, cyclin D1 expression in HCL is not associated with 11:14 translocation, as is usually seen in mantle cell lymphoma [13]. Furthermore, angiogenesis and strong expression of cytokines, adhesion molecules, and growth factors such as tumor necrosis factor alpha or interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4, IL-13, G-CSF, or GM-CSF have been described, all of which may contribute to the pathogenesis of HCL through promotion of cell proliferation or inhibition of apoptosis [6, 13, 1619]. In addition, there is suggestion that activating viruses such as human T lymphotropic virus (HTLV)-2 may play a role, especially in the case of HCL-V [20].


    CLINICAL MANIFESTATION
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
The typical presentation of HCL is that of a middle-aged man with pancytopenia, splenomegaly, and inaspirable bone marrow resulting from myelofibrosis (Table 1Go). However, there are salient clinical distinctions between classic HCL and HCL-V (Table 2Go). Monocytopenia is a frequent feature, and few patients, especially those with HCL-V, have circulating hairy cells. It is thought that the 5:1 male predominance seen with HCL may be related to the higher occupational exposure of men to ionizing radiation and benzene and other solvents [5]. Pancytopenia is seen in about 50%–70% of patients, while 30%–50% show varying degrees and combinations of cytopenias [13]. Cytopenias are often an incidental finding and are usually seen in asymptomatic patients. Splenomegaly is present in about 80% of patients [21] but apparently is much less common in HCL-V (Table 2Go). When symptoms are present, they are often the result of cytopenic complications such as infection, fatigue, or bleeding. Splenomegaly may cause abdominal pain and early satiety.

There are numerous case reports of atypical manifestations of HCL and coexistence with other B-lymphoid malignancies. For example, HCL may atypically present with cutaneous, visceral, bone, pleural, and meningeal involvement [2229]. Polyclonal and monoclonal gammopathy have been reported in 3%–20% of patients and may be related to an associated plasma cell dyscrasia, lymphoma, or autoimmune disorder [3032]. For reasons not yet elucidated, HCL may be associated with a variety of autoimmune disorders, most commonly vasculitis [25, 3339]. The convergent factors of rare disease, variant type, unusual manifestations, and coexistence with other malignancies often result in delayed or wrong diagnosis. When HCL is misdiagnosed, aplastic anemia is a commonly assigned diagnosis. Thus it is crucial to consider the differential diagnosis carefully (Table 3Go). Fortunately, recent diagnostic advances, such as immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and immunophenotypic analysis, have now made such clinical discrimination easier than was the case in the past. It is particularly important to differentiate among HCL, HCL-V, splenic lymphoma with villous lymphocytes (SLVL), and B-prolymphocytic leukemia (B-PLL).


    DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Traditionally, diagnosis was based on a morphologic evaluation of the bone marrow and peripheral blood, with confirmatory evidence provided by cytochemical staining of hairy cells for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP). TRAP testing has, for the most part, been relegated to history. Current diagnostic laboratory methods rely less on TRAP, which is laborious and cannot be performed effectively on paraffin-embedded tissues sections. Instead, IHC staining and the immunophenotypic pattern on flow cytometry, combined with the constellation of cytopenias, splenomegaly, and morphology, are used with great diagnostic accuracy. Because the bone marrow, the spleen, and, less often, the peripheral blood are the major sites involved in HCL, diagnostic evaluation requires bone marrow aspirate/biopsy, imaging studies to assess for splenomegaly if it is not palpable on physical examination, and the review of a peripheral blood count and smear. Among these, the bone marrow biopsy and aspirate represents the best test for an accurate diagnosis [40].


    MORPHOLOGY
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Classic HCL consists of small to medium-sized lymphocytes with an oval or indented nucleus, loose chromatin, and inconspicuous nucleoli [40]. There is abundant cytoplasm with hairy projections. HCL-V resembles a prolymphocyte with round or oval nucleus, which is occasionally bilobed and has moderately basophilic villous cytoplasm [40].

Immunophenotype
No single marker is diagnostic when differentiating HCL from other B-cell leukemias. Instead, laboratory diagnosis is best made by integrating morphologic features and the strong expression of pan B-cell markers and HCL-specific markers (Table 4Go) [6, 40, 4244]. Recently, a scoring system of immunophenotypic markers has been proposed as a way to further improve phenotypic diagnostic accuracy [41]. Yet, despite this effort, a proportion of HCL cases may remain undiagnosed by immunophenotype alone [10].

IHC Staining
Unlike the tedious enzymatic analysis for TRAP, which is poorly reproducible and could not be performed on paraffin-embedded tissues, growing lists of simplified IHC stains have been introduced. Two commonly used IHC stains are HC2 and 9C5. IHC has the advantage of being easy to perform on both peripheral blood and paraffin-embedded tissues, making it useful in monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) [45,46]. The sensitivity and specificity vary among tissue type and for 9C5 appear to be better when done on paraffinized tissues [46]. Ongoing advances such as gene profiling are identifying new targets for immunostaining. One such marker is annexin A1 (ANXA1), which is one of the genes upregulated in HCL. In an immunostaining study of 500 varied B-cells tumors, ANXA1 clearly discriminated among typical HCL, HCL-V, and SLVL with 100% sensitivity and specificity [10].


    TREATMENT
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Despite its indolent course, most patients require treatment at some point. There is no specific guideline for initiating therapy. Generally, worsening cytopenias, recurrent cytopenic complications, progressive visceral involvement, prominent unusual manifestations such as bulky adenopathy, and significant autoimmune disease constitute reasons to start treatment. Historically, therapy for HCL has evolved. Prior to the advent of nucleoside analogues, which are currently the standard initial treatment, interferon and splenectomy were the most effective therapies. While complete remission was very rare with splenectomy alone, it improved cytopenias and provided relief for symptomatic splenomegaly, but long-term survival was not demonstrated in any randomized trial [47]. Today, splenectomy is rarely used and only in patients who are not candidates for or are resistant to current standard therapies.

Interferon-{alpha} was used in HCL with great effectiveness in the early 1980s. It was typically advocated for patients who had failed splenectomy [48]. The usual dose is 3 x 106 IU s.c. daily until remission. Responders were subsequently treated with a long maintenance of 18–24 months, given three times per week. One of the first publications was on seven patients reported by Quesada et al. [49]. The overall response rate was 100%, with a complete response (CR) rate only 43.6%, which was maintained for a short duration of 6–10 months. This finding has been corroborated by other investigators. A large, multicenter, prospective trial of 104 HCL patients lead by the Italian Cooperative Group of Hairy Cell Leukemia (ICGHCL) showed an overall response rate of 93%, with a CR rate of 13% [50]. Several mechanisms have been postulated for the rapid activity of interferon in HCL. Lepe-Zuniga et al. [51] presented in vitro data that showed a direct relationship between disease activity and constitutional ability to produce interferon-{alpha}, implying that deficiency of endogenous production of interferon-{alpha} may be implicated in the induction and sustenance of remission in patients with HCL. Similarly, relapses may be partly associated with failure to fully restore endogenous interferon-{alpha} production after treatment. Despite its salutary effect, clinical use of interferon-{alpha} was limited by the small number of complete responses and the side effects associated with prolonged maintenance in responders [52, 53].

The purine analogues cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine) and pentostatin (2'-deoxycoformycin) came into clinical use in the mid-1980s and are currently the cornerstones in the initial treatment of HCL [53, 54]. Cladribine is given at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg per day as a continuous i.v. infusion for 7 days, or more recently, the same total dose at 0.14 mg/kg is given as a 2-hour infusion over 5 consecutive days, while pentostatin is administered at 4 mg/m2 every 2 weeks until maximum response [4]. With the 7-day cladribine continuous infusion, the overall response rate is in the range 95%–100%, with a CR rate of 82%–91% [55, 56]. The 5-day cladribine infusion obviates the need for a portable pump required with the 7-day infusion, which has been associated with underdosing errors and poor clinical response [57]. In a prospective, randomized trial of 118 patients, Robak et al. [58] compared two methods of cladribine administration. One group was treated with cladribine at a dose of 0.12 mg/kg per day in a 2-hour i.v. infusion for five consecutive days while the second group received the same dose once a week for 6 weeks. That study found comparable overall and complete response rates in the two groups. Toxicities were similar, though thrombocytopenia was worse with the 7-day continuous infusion.

Further simplification of the cladribine administration schedule to a single weekly dose for 5 weeks has been proposed. Zinzani and colleagues [59] compared this schedule with the 5-consecutive-days schedule in a series of 37 patients followed over 122 months (range, 54–156) and reported similar response rates and CR rates of 100% and 79%, respectively. Relapse rates were not statistically different, but fewer cases of grade 3–4 neutropenia were reported with the weekly dosing schedule, suggesting that this may be a safer option for HCL patients presenting with neutropenia. Although both cladribine and pentostatin are efficacious, the simplicity in dosing of cladribine coupled with its favorable toxicity profile, high percentage of complete remissions, and low incidence of relapse has earned it the first choice of treatment for HCL. Cladribine, like pentostatin, induces apoptosis by disrupting cellular metabolism through inhibition of DNA synthesis in both resting and dividing cells [54, 55, 60].

In general, cladribine is well tolerated, but further hematological deterioration in the early stage of treatment as well as prolonged lymphopenia of the CD4 subset may occur following treatment and lead to infectious complications [61, 62]. Cladribine is commonly chosen as the initial treatment. Pentostatin is an alternative choice, although it is more frequently used after relapse following cladribine or in cladribine-resistant disease. Long-term follow-up studies demon strate that, while both agents result in a high complete remission rate and overall survival rate, cure is not achieved with either agent. This was illustrated in a recent publication by Else et al. [63] in which 219 patients with HCL were followed for 12.5 years (range, 1.0–34.6 years) from their initial diagnosis. One hundred eighty-five patients received pentostatin and 34 patients were given cladribine. The overall and complete response rates for cladribine were 100% and 82%, respectively, versus 96% and 81%, respectively, with pentostatin. The median disease-free survival (DFS) times for cladribine and pentostatin were 11 years and 15 years, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year relapse rates were 33% and 48%, respectively, in the cladribine-treated group, versus 24% and 42%, respectively, with pentostatin. The overall 10-year survival rates for cladribine and pentostatin were 100% and 96%, respectively, but neither agent achieved a plateau in DFS.


    DRUG RESISTANCE, DISEASE RELAPSE, AND MONITORING MRD
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Despite revolutionizing the treatment of HCL, resistance and relapses occur with purine analogues. Resistance is a major problem with HCL-V in particular [44]. A pooled analysis of four clinical trials [6467] with more than 152 patients that included 14 HCL-V patients treated with either cladribine or pentostatin demonstrated a lack of response in 78.6% and partial response in 22.4% of patients. There were no CRs. Fortunately, despite this resistance, most patients with HCL-V appear to have a benign chronic course of more than 4 years before disease progression [44]. Relapses in HCL are in the range of 20%–30% at 5 years and up to 48% at 10 years [59, 63, 68, 69]. This level of relapse raises several questions, including the feasibility of detecting MRD, whether MRD detection can predict relapse, and, finally, whether treating detected cases will improve survival.

While MRD can be detected by flow cytometry and IHC methods, the ability to predict relapse has been mixed [47, 61, 7072]. For patients who achieve a CR after therapy, the rate of MRD does not appear to differ between those treated with cladribine and pentostatin [72]. Moreover, the rates of MRD detection by these methods are only modest. Bengio et al. [70] reported detection rates of 64% and 46% with flow cytometry and IHC detection methods, respectively, and neither method predicted hematological relapse. To our knowledge, there is no randomized study showing that treating patients with MRD offers any survival advantage when compared with watchful waiting for clinical disease recurrence before retreatment.

When clinical relapse occurs in typical HCL, the therapeutic options include retreatment with the same purine analogue as the initial treatment or employing alternate agents. Although the purine analogues, including the newer fludarabine, share similar chemical structures and mechanisms of action, there is surprisingly little or no crossresistance among them [60, 73, 74]. In a study of 144 treated patients, Piro and coworkers [74] identified five patients who were either resistant to or intolerant of pentostatin. Retreatment of these patients with cladribine resulted in a 100% overall response rate with an 80% complete remission rate. Similarly, in a large review of 210 patients previously treated with either pentostatin or cladribine, Dearden et al. [73] identified 21 patients with relapsed or resistant disease. Retreatment of these patients with the other agent resulted in markedly high second remissions. O’Brien and Keating have suggested retreatment with the same first-line agent if the patient has had more than 3 years of remission before relapse and choosing an alternative agent if remission has been <3 years. To improve on the remarkable therapeutic successes in HCL over the past 20 years, new agents are actively being evaluated (Table 5Go). These include the purine analogues fludarabine, clofarabine, and nelarabine as well as mono-clonal antibodies and immunoconjugates. Rituximab has been shown to achieve a CR rate of 13%–53% in relapsed or refractory HCL and appears to be active with HCL-V, as well [75, 76]. In a recent study by Ravandi et al. [77], 11 newly diagnosed and two refractory HCL patients were treated with daily cladribine at 5.6 mg/m2 i.v. over 2 hours for 5 days, followed by eight doses of weekly rituximab at 375 mg/m2. While all 13 patients achieved a CR and 92% had eradication of MRD, it is not known, given the small size of the study and short follow-up, if this strategy offers an additional therapeutic advantage over cladribine alone in these cohorts of patients. In a phase I clinical trial of BL22 that included HCL-V patients, the overall response rate was 79%, with a CR rate of 61% [78]. The search for newer agents is especially needed for the 10%–20% of HCL patients with the variant phenotype, who currently have limited therapeutic options.


    ADVERSE EFFECTS OF THERAPY
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Hematologic, neurologic, and immunologic dysfunction are the major toxicities seen with the purine analogues [60]. However, concerns about the development of second malignancies, usually occurring many years after initial treatment with interferon and nucleoside analogues, have been raised [47, 48, 7982]. Yet it remains unclear whether this phenomenon is a result of an inherent tendency of HCL patients to develop second malignancies or is a result of treatment. The incidence of second malignancies is in the range of 8%–21.3% [81, 83]. In a retrospective review of 1,022 patients treated initially with either best supportive care, single-agent chemotherapy, splenectomy, interferon, or purine analogues, the ICGHCL found a 5.3% incidence of second malignancies, excluding skin cancer [84]. Of the 54 patients with second malignancies, only six patients had previously been treated with a purine analogue. The cumulative risks for the development of a second cancer were 5%, 10%, and 14% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, but the overall incidence of second malignancies was not significantly higher than the expected standardized incidence ratio of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74–1.33). Nonetheless, the standardized incidence ratio of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the entire cohort was higher at 5.3 (95% CI, 1.9–11.5). This and other published data seem to support the notion that these second malignancies are not related to genetic predisposition of HCL or to treatment effect [83]. Despite this observation, close cancer monitoring and prevention for these patients is strongly advised.


    FOLLOW-UP ON PRESENTED PATIENT CASES
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
The two patients introduced in this review have classic HCL and clinically represent the usual diagnostic problems that clinicians face with HCL and which often result in unnecessary treatments. Both cases were initially misdiagnosed as aplastic anemia, with patient B going on to receive prolonged immunosuppressive therapy but, as expected, without response. When HCL was finally diagnosed many years after their initial presentation, both patients were treated with cladribine at 0.14 mg/kg i.v. for 5 days. Both tolerated the treatment fairly well except for an episode of neutropenic fever in patient A and moderate malaise in patient B. Patient A achieved a CR and is currently completing adjuvant chemotherapy for her stage III breast cancer. Patient B did not respond but remained fairly asymptomatic despite persistent cytopenias. His lack of hematological response may be a result of his previous extensive treatment or because of cladribine resistance. For now, he will be watched carefully for a few more months before retreatment, although there is the concern of further hematological deterioration if his counts are not fully recovered before additional therapy.


    SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
HCL is a unique chronic lymphoproliferative disorder that can mimic or coexist with other clonal hematologic disorders. It can present with pancytopenia or variable cytopenias, associated with splenomegaly and inaspirable bone marrow resulting from fibrosis. Unusual manifestations can be seen. HCL should be entertained as an alternative diagnosis in patients being considered for the diagnosis of aplastic anemia, hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndrome, atypical chronic lymphocytic leukemia, B-PLL, and idiopathic myelofibrosis. HCL-V makes up about 10% of cases. Despite advances in cell biology and molecular genetics, the etiology and molecular defects underlying HCL have not been fully elucidated. Nonetheless, a high treatment response rate and durable remission are frequently achieved for classic HCL, in contrast to the poor response seen with the variant type. Diagnosis of HCL is based on careful consideration of the differential diagnosis and combining presenting findings with laboratory data. Flow cytometry and IHC now play prominent roles in HCL diagnosis. The purine analogues cladribine and pentostatin are the cornerstone of treatment, with cladribine frequently used because of its simple dosing schedule. Resistance to these agents occurs in a small number of cases, but relapse, albeit after long duration, is much more common. Thus, cure does not currently exist for this disorder. Therapy for relapsed disease relies on retreatment with the same agent if previous remission has been durable or treatment with a previously unused purine analogue in patients with shorter remissions. New agents are being explored that should hopefully improve on current treatment responses and bring HCL closer to cure.


    DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
The authors indicate no potential conflicts of interest.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Clinical diagnostic features of hairy cell leukemia

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Clinical distinction between hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL variant (HCL-V)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Important differential diagnosis for hairy cell leukemia (HCL)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Phenotypic differential diagnosis of hairy cell leukemia

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. New and experimental agents for the treatment of hairy cell leukemia

 

    REFERENCES
 Top
 Learning Objectives
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Presentation
 Biology and Pathogenesis
 Clinical Manifestation
 Diagnostic Evaluation
 Morphology
 Treatment
 Drug Resistance, Disease...
 Adverse Effects of Therapy
 Follow-Up on Presented Patient...
 Summary and Conclusions
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
  1. Ya-In C, Brandwein J, Pantalony D et al. Hairy cell leukemia variant with features of intrasinusoidal bone marrow involvement. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;129:395–398.[Medline]
  2. Bouroncle BA, Wiseman BK, Doan CA. Leukemic reticuloendotheliosis. Blood 1958;13:609–630.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Schrek R, Donnelly WJ. "Hairy" cells in blood in lymphoreticular neoplastic disease and "flagellated" cells of normal lymph nodes. Blood 1966;27:199–211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. O’Brien S, Keating MJ. Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology, Seventh Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005: 2133–2143.
  5. Flandrin G, Collado S. Is male predominance (4/1) in hairy cell leukaemia related to occupational exposure to ionizing radiation, benzene and other solvents? Br J Haematol 1987;67:119–120.[Medline]
  6. Polliack A. Hairy cell leukemia: biology, clinical diagnosis, unusual manifestations and associated disorders. Rev Clin Exp Hematol 2002;6:366–388; discussion 449–450.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Paoletti M, Bitter MA, Vardiman JW. Hairy-cell leukemia. Morphologic, cytochemical, and immunologic features. Clin Lab Med 1988;8:179–195.[Medline]
  8. Vallianatou K, Brito-Babapulle V, Matutes E et al. p53 gene deletion and trisomy 12 in hairy cell leukemia and its variant. Leuk Res 1999;23:1041–1045.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Basso K, Liso A, Tiacci E et al. Gene expression profiling of hairy cell leukemia reveals a phenotype related to memory B cells with altered expression of chemokine and adhesion receptors. J Exp Med 2004;199:59–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Falini B, Tiacci E, Liso A et al. Simple diagnostic assay for hairy cell leukaemia by immunocytochemical detection of annexin A1 (ANXA1). Lancet 2004;363:1869–1870.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Vanhentenrijk V, De Wolf-Peeters C, Wlodarska I. Comparative expressed sequence hybridization studies of hairy cell leukemia show uniform expression profile and imprint of spleen signature. Blood 2004;104: 250–255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Forconi F, Sahota SS, Raspadori D et al. Hairy cell leukemia: at the crossroad of somatic mutation and isotype switch. Blood 2004;104:3312–3317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Zuzel M, Cawley JC. The biology of hairy cells. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2003;16:1–13.[Medline]
  14. Konig EA, Kusser WC, Day C et al. p53 mutations in hairy cell leukemia. Leukemia 2000;14:706–711.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Capello D, Vitolo U, Pasqualucci L et al. Distribution and pattern of BCL-6 mutations throughout the spectrum of B-cell neoplasia. Blood 2000;95:651–659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Burthem J, Baker PK, Hunt JA et al. Hairy cell interactions with extracellular matrix: expression of specific integrin receptors and their role in the cell’s response to specific adhesive proteins. Blood 1994;84:873–882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Burthem J, Baker PK, Hunt JA et al. The function of c-fms in hairy-cell leukemia: macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates hairy-cell movement. Blood 1994;83:1381–1389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Digel W, Porzsolt F, Schmid M et al. High levels of circulating soluble receptors for tumor necrosis factor in hairy cell leukemia and type B chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Invest 1992;89:1690–1693.[Medline]
  19. Montserrat E. Chronic lymphoproliferative disorders. Curr Opin Oncol 1997;9:34–41.[Medline]
  20. Feuer G, Green PL. Comparative biology of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2. Oncogene 2005;24:5996–6004.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Flandrin G, Sigaux F, Castaigne S et al. [Hairy cell leukemia: study of the development of 211 cases]. Presse Med 1984;13:2795–2799. French.[Medline]
  22. Alexandrakis MG, Passam FH, Kyriakou DS et al. Pleural effusions in hematologic malignancies. Chest 2004;125:1546–1555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bouroncle BA, Grever MR, Kraut EH. Treatment of hairy cell leukemia: the Ohio State University experience with deoxycoformycin. Leukemia 1987;1:350–354.[Medline]
  24. Copeland AR, Bueso-Ramos C, Liu FJ et al. Molecular study of hairy cell leukemia variant with biclonal paraproteinemia. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997;121:150–154.[Medline]
  25. Domingo A, Crespo N, Fernandez de Sevilla A et al. Hairy cell leukemia and autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Leukemia 1992;6:606–607.[Medline]
  26. Hakimian D, Tallman MS, Hogan DK et al. Prospective evaluation of internal adenopathy in a cohort of 43 patients with hairy cell leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:268–272.[Abstract]
  27. Mercieca J, Puga M, Matutes E et al. Incidence and significance of abdominal lymphadenopathy in hairy cell leukaemia. Leuk Lymphoma 1994;14(suppl 1):79–83.[Medline]
  28. Rose C, Auxenfants E, Noel MP et al. [Tuberculosis, mycobacterium infection and hairy cell leukemia]. Presse Med 1997;26:110–114. French.[Medline]
  29. Wolfe DW, Scopelliti JA, Boselli BD. Leukemic meningitis in a patient with hairy cell leukemia. A case report. Cancer 1984;54:1085–1087.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Bassan R, Pronesti M, Buzzetti M et al. Autoimmunity and B-cell dysfunction in chronic proliferative disorders of large granular lymphocytes/natural killer cells. Cancer 1989;63:90–95.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Marolleau JP, Henni T, Gaulard P et al. Hairy cell leukemia associated with large granular lymphocyte leukemia: immunologic and genomic study, effect of interferon treatment. Blood 1988;72:655–660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Pascali E, Pezzoli A. The clinical spectrum of pure Bence Jones proteinuria. A study of 66 patients. Cancer 1988;62:2408–2415.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Clore LS Jr, Stafford CT. Chronic urticaria as a presenting sign of hairy cell leukemia. Allergy Asthma Proc 1999;20:51–55.[Medline]
  34. Mainwaring CJ, Walewska R, Snowden J et al. Fatal cold anti-i autoimmune haemolytic anaemia complicating hairy cell leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2000;109:641–643.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Richard C, Sedano MC, Mazorra F et al. Hairy-cell leukaemia associated with auto-immune disorders in the form of a ‘lupus-type’ anticoagulant and a positive direct Coombs’ test. Acta Haematol 1986;75:181–182.[Medline]
  36. Rios R, Gascon F, Sole F et al. [Analysis of response to interferon alpha-2b and the significance of antinuclear antibodies in hairy cell leukemia]. Med Clin (Barc) 1996;106:583–585. Spanish.[Medline]
  37. Shpilberg O, Ehrenfeld M, Berkovitz M et al. Hairy cell leukemia with an autoimmune syndrome, paraproteinemia, and cryoglobulinemia. South Med J 1989;82:1552–1554.[Medline]
  38. Vernhes JP, Schaeverbeke T, Fach J et al. Chronic immunity-driven poly-arthritis in hairy cell leukemia. Report of a case and review of the literature. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1997;64:578–581.[Medline]
  39. Westbrook CA, Golde DW. Autoimmune disease in hairy-cell leukaemia: clinical syndromes and treatment. Br J Haematol 1985;61:349–356.[Medline]
  40. Foucar K, Catovsky D. Pathology & Genetics: Tumours of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon: IARC Press, 2001:138–141
  41. Matutes E, Owusu-Ankomah K, Morilla R et al. The immunological profile of B-cell disorders and proposal of a scoring system for the diagnosis of CLL. Leukemia 1994;8:1640–1645.[Medline]
  42. Matutes E, Wotherspoon A, Catovsky D. The variant form of hairy-cell leukaemia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2003;16:41–56.[Medline]
  43. Polliack A, Dann EJ. Rapid massive splenic relapse of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) during bone marrow remission after 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine therapy: the spleen as a sanctuary site in HCL? Blood 1994;84:2057–2058.[Free Full Text]
  44. Sainati L, Matutes E, Mulligan S et al. A variant form of hairy cell leukemia resistant to alpha-interferon: clinical and phenotypic characteristics of 17 patients. Blood 1990;76:157–162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Berman E, Posnett DN. Diagnosis and monitoring in patients with hairy cell leukemia using the monoclonal antibody anti-HC2. Leukemia 1987;1:305–307.[Medline]
  46. Janckila AJ, Cardwell EM, Yam LT et al. Hairy cell identification by immunohistochemistry of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase. Blood 1995;85:2839–2844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Frassoldati A, Lamparelli T, Federico M et al. Hairy cell leukemia: a clinical review based on 725 cases of the Italian Cooperative Group (ICGHCL). Italian Cooperative Group for Hairy Cell Leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 1994;13:307–316.[Medline]
  48. Federico M, Frassoldati A, Lamparelli T et al. Long-term results of alpha interferon as initial therapy and splenectomy as consolidation therapy in patients with hairy cell leukemia. Final report from the Italian Cooperative Group for HCL. Ann Oncol 1994;5:725–731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Quesada JR, Reuben J, Manning JT et al. Alpha interferon for induction of remission in hairy-cell leukemia. N Engl J Med 1984;310:15–18.[Abstract]
  50. Capnist G, Federico M, Chisesi T et al. Long term results of interferon treatment in hairy cell leukemia. Italian Cooperative Group of Hairy Cell Leukemia (ICGHCL). Leuk Lymphoma 1994;14:457–464.[Medline]
  51. Lepe-Zuniga JL, Quesada JR, Baron S et al. Alpha interferon production in patients with hairy cell leukemia: correlations with disease activity and remission status. Hematol Pathol 1987;1:157–165.[Medline]
  52. Gollard R, Lee TC, Piro LD et al. The optimal management of hairy cell leukaemia. Drugs 1995;49:921–931.[Medline]
  53. Carson DA, Carrera CJ, Wasson DB et al. Programmed cell death and adenine deoxynucleotide metabolism in human lymphocytes. Adv Enzyme Regul 1988;27:395–404.[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Carson DA, Leoni LM. Hairy-cell leukaemia as a model for drug development. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2003;16:83–89.[Medline]
  55. Idink-Mecking CA, Richel DJ, Vermes I et al. Ex vivo evidence of lymphocyte apoptosis in hairy cell leukemia, induced by 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine treatment. Ann Hematol 1998;76:25–29.[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Piro LD, Carrera CJ, Carson DA et al. Lasting remissions in hairy-cell leukemia induced by a single infusion of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1117–1121.[Abstract]
  57. Golde DW, Jakubowiak A, Caggiano J et al. Cladribine underdosing in hairy-cell leukemia: a cause for apparent response failure. Leuk Lymphoma 2002;43:365–367.[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Robak T, Kasznicki M, Gora-Tybor J et al. Randomized comparison of weekly administration and daily courses of cladribine in patients with hairy cell leukemia – updated results. Am Soc Hematol Annual Meeting Abstracts 2004;104:3478.
  59. Zinzani PL, Tani M, Marchi E et al. Long-term follow-up of front-line treatment of hairy cell leukemia with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. Haematologica 2004;89:309–313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Robak T, Korycka A, Kasznicki M et al. Purine nucleoside analogues for the treatment of hematological malignancies: pharmacology and clinical applications. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2005;5:421–444.[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Bastie JN, Cazals-Hatem D, Daniel MT et al. Five years follow-up after 2-chloro deoxyadenosine treatment in thirty patients with hairy cell leukemia: evaluation of minimal residual disease and CD4+ lymphocytopenia after treatment. Leuk Lymphoma 1999;35:555–565.[Medline]
  62. Betticher DC, Fey MF, von Rohr A et al. High incidence of infections after 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CDA) therapy in patients with malignant lymphomas and chronic and acute leukaemias. Ann Oncol 1994;5:57–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Else M, Ruchlemer R, Osuji N et al. Long remissions in hairy cell leukemia with purine analogs: a report of 219 patients with a median follow-up of 12.5 years. Cancer 2005;104:2442–2448.[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. Blasinska-Morawiec M, Robak T, Krykowski E et al. Hairy cell leukemia-variant treated with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine--a report of three cases. Leuk Lymphoma 1997;25:381–385.[Medline]
  65. Estey EH, Kurzrock R, Kantarjian HM et al. Treatment of hairy cell leukemia with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA). Blood 1992;79:882–887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Mercieca J, Matutes E, Emmett E et al. 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine in the treatment of hairy cell leukaemia: differences in response in patients with and without abdominal lymphadenopathy. Br J Haematol 1996;93:409–411.[CrossRef][Medline]
  67. Robak T, Blasinska-Morawiec M, Blonski J et al. 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine (cladribine) in the treatment of hairy cell leukemia and hairy cell leukemia variant: 7-year experience in Poland. Eur J Haematol 1999;62:49–56.[Medline]
  68. Chadha P, Rademaker AW, Mendiratta P et al. Treatment of hairy cell leukemia with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA): long-term follow-up of the Northwestern University experience. Blood 2005;106:241–246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Tallman MS, Zakarija A. Hairy cell leukemia: survival and relapse. Long-term follow-up of purine analog-based therapy and approach for relapsed disease. Transfus Apher Sci 2005;32:99–103.[CrossRef][Medline]
  70. Bengio R, Narbaitz M, Palacios F et al. [Hairy cell leukemia. An alternative method for the detection of minimal residual disease using flow cytometry]. Medicina (B Aires) 2000;60(suppl 2):71–76. Spanish.[Medline]
  71. Matutes E, Meeus P, McLennan K et al. The significance of minimal residual disease in hairy cell leukaemia treated with deoxycoformycin: a long-term follow-up study. Br J Haematol 1997;98:375–383.[CrossRef][Medline]
  72. Tallman MS, Hakimian D, Kopecky KJ et al. Minimal residual disease in patients with hairy cell leukemia in complete remission treated with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine or 2-deoxycoformycin and prediction of early relapse. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:1665–1670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Dearden CE, Matutes E, Hilditch BL et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with hairy cell leukaemia after treatment with pentostatin or cladribine. Br J Haematol 1999;106:515–519.[CrossRef][Medline]
  74. Piro LD, Ellison DJ, Saven A. The Scripps Clinic experience with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine in the treatment of hairy cell leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 1994;14(suppl 1):121–125.[Medline]
  75. Quach H, Januszewicz H, Westerman D. Complete remission of hairy cell leukemia variant (HCL-v) complicated by red cell aplasia post treatment with rituximab. Haematologica 2005;90(suppl):ECR26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Thomas DA, O’Brien S, Bueso-Ramos C et al. Rituximab in relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukemia. Blood 2003;102:3906–3911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Ravandi F, Jorgensen JL, O’Brien SM et al. Eradication of minimal residual disease in hairy cell leukemia. Blood 2006;107:4658–4662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. Kreitman RJ, Squires DR, Stetler-Stevenson M et al. Phase I trial of recombinant immunotoxin RFB4(dsFv)-PE38 (BL22) in patients with B-cell malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6719–6729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Golomb HM, Ratain MJ, Mick R et al. Interferon treatment for hairy cell leukemia: an update on a cohort of 69 patients treated from 1983–1986. Leukemia 1992;6:1177–1180.[Medline]
  80. Jehn U, Bartl R, Dietzfelbinger H et al. Long-term outcome of hairy cell leukemia treated with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. Ann Hematol 1999;78:139–144.[CrossRef][Medline]
  81. Saven A, Burian C, Koziol JA et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with hairy cell leukemia after cladribine treatment. Blood 1998;92:1918–1926.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Spielberger RT, Mick R, Ratain MJ et al. Interferon treatment for hairy cell leukemia. An update on a cohort of 69 patients treated from 1983 to 1986. Leuk Lymphoma 1994;14(suppl 1):89–93.[Medline]
  83. Au WY, Klasa RJ, Gallagher R et al. Second malignancies in patients with hairy cell leukemia in British Columbia: a 20-year experience. Blood 1998;92:1160–1164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  84. Federico M, Zinzani PL, Frassoldati A et al. Risk of second cancer in patients with hairy cell leukemia: long-term follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:638–646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Clin PatholHome page
Y. Natkunam, S. Tedoldi, J. C. Paterson, S. Zhao, M. Rodriguez-Justo, A. H. Beck, R. Siebert, D. Y. Mason, and T. Marafioti
Characterization of c-Maf Transcription Factor in Normal and Neoplastic Hematolymphoid Tissue and Its Relevance in Plasma Cell Neoplasia
Am J Clin Pathol, September 1, 2009; 132(3): 361 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wanko, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by de Castro, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wanko, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by de Castro, C.


HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS