help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First Published Online November 4, 2008
The Oncologist, Vol. 13, No. 11, 1177-1180, November 2008; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0210
© 2008 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
theoncologist.2008-0210v1
13/11/1177    most recent
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schapira, L.
Right arrow Articles by Chabner, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schapira, L.
Right arrow Articles by Chabner, B.

Medical Ethics: Schwartz Center Rounds

Racism in the Chemotherapy Infusion Unit: A Nurse's Story

Lidia Schapiraa, Leah Gordon-Roweb, Rosalba Martignettib, Deborah Washingtonb, Mimi Bartholomayb, Donna Greenbergc, Christopher Lathand, Joanne LaFrancescab, Thomas Lyncha, Bruce Chabnera

aDepartment of Medical Oncology, bDepartment of Nursing, cDepartment of Social Services, and dDana Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence: Lidia Schapira, M.D., Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Gillette Center for Breast Cancer, 55 Fruit Street, YAW 9, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. Telephone: 617-726-6500; Fax: 617-724-6898; e-mail: lschapira{at}partners.org

Received September 22, 2008; accepted for publication September 30, 2008; first published online in THE ONCOLOGIST Express on November 4, 2008.

Disclosure: Employment/leadership position: None; Intellectual property rights/inventor/patent holder: None; Consultant/advisory role: Thomas Lynch, Astra Zeneca, Imclone, Genentech, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Millennium, Sanofi, Serono/Merck; Honoraria: None; Research funding/contracted research: None; Ownership interest: None; Expert testimony: None; Other: None.

The content of this article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias. No financial relationships relevant to the content of this article have been disclosed by the authors, planners, independent peer reviewers, or staff managers.


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Dialogue
 Commentary
 Author Contributions
 References
 
Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded The Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH. The Schwartz Center is a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery that provides hope to the patient and support to caregivers, and encourages the healing process. The Center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members.

In this article a nurse relates her experience as caregiver for a patient who made repeated racially motivated comments. She reflects on her response and the support she received from her colleagues.


    DIALOGUE
 Top
 Abstract
 Dialogue
 Commentary
 Author Contributions
 References
 
Infusion nurse: Last year I was assigned the care of a gentleman with a diagnosis of small cell lung cancer. He was prescribed cisplatin and etoposide. He tolerated the cisplatin but reacted soon into the etoposide treatment. Immediately we gave him methylprednisolone and then diphenhydramine to alleviate the symptoms of the reaction, and after receiving diphenhydramine he started slurring his words and said, "Oh, I sound like I'm talking like a Puerto Rican." At this point I realized he might become a challenge.

The following day he seemed anxious. He received premedication as he would for every subsequent treatment. He complained about the extra time this added to his treatment. It was around the third cycle that he was watching a TV court program featuring a white woman with her black male partner fighting. He said to me, "Does it bother you when white women are with black men?" It struck me as an odd question. Thinking that he may be curious, I responded: "No, it doesn't really bother me. Actually my mother-in-law is white; my husband is half black and half white, so obviously it doesn't bother me." He then asked, "But how does the mother give the child culture?" and I said, "well I would think like any mother would give her child culture." He repeated the question two more times until I finally responded: "I don't know if you know, but I am biracial, my husband is biracial, my mother-in-law happens to be white. I think that my mother did a great job giving us culture, my mother-in-law did a great job giving my husband culture: ethnic, religious and American culture."

A few weeks later he made a comment about my hair, saying "But Oprah doesn't have hair like that." I then talked with my colleagues and they expressed support, sympathy, and concern, and also wondered if he was surprised at being in the hands of a competent black professional. I turned to my clinical nurse specialist because I wanted to excuse myself from his care. Her advice was to set limits and remain involved and that I ask an associate nurse to become involved. I was concerned that I would not be able to put up with his jabs and maintain my composure as a nurse. This was a challenge I had never before experienced in my nursing career. I experienced intense anxiety for a few days before his next scheduled visit and began to think of him as "my racist patient." He returned with more questions and I handed him off to a colleague when my shift ended.

At every step of the way, I was supported by colleagues and senior leadership. For a person of color to be able to say, when you look out here in a city full of people who don't really look like you, who might not understand what you go through on a daily basis, "this happened to me and I don't really know what to do about this," and feel supported, was tremendous.

Clinical Nurse Specialist: As professionals, we do not get to pick and choose our patients. We often have to take care of patients who are difficult to deal with and know how to push our buttons. There is probably not a nurse or physician here who has not run into some kind of prejudice during the course of their work. My greatest concern for this nurse was that because of her skin color, she would be subject to a disproportionate degree of prejudice during the course of her career. I wanted her to be able to stand up for herself and tried to help her find ways to feel more empowered.

Second Infusion Nurse: I took over the care of the patient for the day and went in to introduce myself to him. The first question he asked me was, "Where are you from?" Our last names indicated a common ethnicity. After that he asked me if I knew what medication was in his i.v. solution. I assured him that I knew his chemotherapy regimen. He went on to ask me if I knew what happened the very first day he was seen in our unit and proceeded to pick apart his nurse's care from the onset. He said that she should have given him premedications before giving the chemotherapy and, in so doing, would have avoided his initial reaction. I explained to him that patients do not typically react to etoposide and it is not standard practice to administer premedications. I went on to reassure him.

He then asked about my cultural background and remarked that we had the same ethnicity. He went on to make racist comments, which I found very insulting. I was uncomfortable listening. His wife just shook her head and I said, "You know, some things are better left unsaid," hoping he would take the gentle hint that his comments were inappropriate.

The following day he resumed his repertoire of racially motivated statements. He asked if the "other colored girls were registered nurses too because they're usually not." I explained each person's role to him and confronted him on his use of the word "colored." He responded angrily. I explained that we work in a respectful environment. He did not back down. His wife looked down, embarrassed, shaking her head. Trying to make things lighter I asked, "How have you put up with him all these years?"

He went on to ask me if I was married. After I answered no, he then asked how old I was. Before I could respond he stated, "Never mind. I met you. I know why you're not married." I laughed although I was embarrassed.

Director of Diversity: What I find intriguing about this case is the personal experience of the infusion nurse. Conversations about race and ethnicity are always nuanced. So if this nurse had not found colleagues who understood and supported her, what would she have done? It is very easy to explain away everything that happened. When you have been insulted and someone processes it with you in a way that explains it away, your experience is dismissed.

How do you hear this story and build a response to it? Within this story is the organizational message. The next question is: "Who delivers that message?" The answer has to be that we all do. The message of zero tolerance for discriminatory behavior can only flourish if it is delivered consistently and adhered to by everybody.

Comment from the Audience: Does the hospital have a policy on this?

Director of Diversity: Other than the expected social laws against discrimination, the organization has a strong commitment to diversity that deepens the intent of that social message. Within the context of our institution, we link that message with accountability to act and respond to coded language that implies racist beliefs. The most important decision anybody has to make is to speak up. Typically, in race-based conversations, it means speaking up on behalf of others who are not present.

Another Comment: He was provocative with you. Here he is dealing with a disease. It sounds like nobody really got at what was provoking him or tried to understand it on a different level.

Oncologist: I think the question of a zero tolerance policy is an unfair standard for health care professionals. We do not choose whom we take care of. We still have to care for the patient and seek our own supports to help us through.

Psychiatrist: This goes beyond race. This is a man who was abusive in racial terms and abusive in man-to-woman terms regardless of culture. He went for the vulnerability of the woman of this ethnic group and the woman of a different race. He is a terrified man who is facing the fight of his life, and I suspect he has always coped by lashing out in this way. Someone in authority needs to set limits. I would have gotten the oncologist who was responsible for his care to say, "This is unacceptable. I understand that you are very upset and that it's difficult being ill, but do not be rude to the nurse who works with me."

Physician Moderator: What would you have done in this situation?

Director of Diversity: My practice is to have a conversation in order to have the person declare himself explicitly. I think that we should not allow the implicit to go forward without a challenge. Illness is not an excuse for racism. If we allow this language to go unchallenged we become accomplices.

Clinical Nurse Specialist: If I were the nurse at the bedside and I had just had my emotional button pushed, would I be able to step back and say "that's just unacceptable"? It is very difficult in the moment to do so.

Director of Diversity: We need to prepare for this in the same way we prepare to give medications appropriately. Addressing these situations is a learned skill. This organization has several courses available to the staff.

First Infusion Nurse: I was so focused on his care and still trying to help him see, "I'm okay, I'm good, I can take good care of you," that when some of those comments started I was fearful and concerned. How do we say: "It sounds like you might be racist, let's talk about it"? I want to see the good in everybody and I want people to see the good in me.

Second Infusion Nurse: Being angry at his cancer was not really the issue or the cause of his prejudice. This is the way he is and his experience of illness did nothing to change his views. My colleague's diligent care, expert knowledge, and her multiple attempts to build a relationship with him accomplished nothing. As caregivers, we pride ourselves in providing patient-focused care. Addressing this directly with the patient would have made it about the nurse and not the patient. We need to support one another and respond to the situations at hand.

Psychiatrist: We are in professions of service and we want to be helpful. Diagnostic thinking and training allow you to recognize that this is an abusive man. He has you in his power as long as you are trying to please him and you do not understand that he is over the top. The minute that you feel belittled by a patient, you can stop and say, "This is a belittler." Whatever the reason you are uncomfortable, you can pull back and do exactly what you just did: talk to your colleagues, get support, and think together about how to deal with a belittler, because he is an expert at making everybody uncomfortable.

Director of Diversity: The mission of Schwartz Center is to promote compassionate care and to develop healing relationships with our patients. This man made it impossible. It is important to say to a patient, "This is what's going on, our purpose here is to get you well as effectively as we can. Does my color or does my style or my gender make that hard for you?"

Massachusetts General Hospital has a good reputation for care because we make sure that all of us who practice here are able to meet the same standards of competence. I see no reason to allow patients to take on the role of second-guessing us on that because of their reaction to skin color, hair texture, accent, or gender. Really, what does one thing have to do with the other?


    COMMENTARY
 Top
 Abstract
 Dialogue
 Commentary
 Author Contributions
 References
 
Young professionals of color expect that their presence and competence will be respected in the same manner as that of their white colleagues. Confronted with bigotry time and time again, the protagonist of this story acknowledged her own pain and confusion. She sought advice, received support and encouragement, and first tried to diagnose and fix the situation by setting limits and educating the patient. When this failed, she removed herself from his care. In telling the story to a multidisciplinary audience at Schwartz Rounds, she reflected on the lasting impact of her exposure to this abusive and racist patient.

Diagnostic thinking helps us sort through the possible reasons or motivations of this patient. Was he feeling helpless, scared, or out of control? Appropriate responses can then be oriented toward putting the patient at ease by giving him choices on small matters, being consistent, adhering to professional etiquette, and acknowledging the difficulties of the patient's predicament. Forming a therapeutic alliance remains our professional goal. We can always remind patients that we have a common purpose. If the behavior cannot be managed then it is important to obtain backup and think about more complex motivations or even serious psychiatric pathologies. This patient's abusive treatment of the second nurse clearly showed his true personality. His wife was a silent accomplice in this story.

Racist behavior needs to be addressed as an institutional issue, not a personal one. If ignored, it threatens the care of the individual and serves as a distraction for the team. While little has been written about this specific subject [1- 4], we conclude from the foregoing discussion that it is important for the multidisciplinary team to have a consistent and clear position and to set reasonable limits on racist or abusive behavior. The management of such patients should be a team decision, not the responsibility of a single individual. If the patient is unable to accept reasonable limits then he/she should be encouraged to seek care elsewhere. Isolating the patient or shifting his care to a nonminority caregiver has significant logistic disadvantages and sets a dangerous precedent. From an ethical point of view, accommodating racist behavior can be thought of as a breach of commonly accepted standards for society as a whole. We recognize that there is a spectrum of personal values and ethical mandates that influence the behavior and responses of individual nurses and doctors, and the presence of a life-threatening illness will likely influence how such confrontations are managed.

African Americans represent 12.3% of the U.S. population [5] and are dramatically underrepresented among health care professionals. African Americans account for 4.2% of registered nurses [6] and 2.2% of physicians and medical students [7]. We may expect or even accept a degree of surprise from patients who are not used to being cared for by minority professionals but should not excuse any hint of rudeness. Although we have no jurisdiction over beliefs, prejudices, or comments made outside our treatment facilities, we can enforce a culture of tolerance and civility within.

It is easy to dismiss this case as an example of bullying and focus on the need to train the staff to recognize and respond to a desperate man who repeatedly abused his caregivers. To do so would be to miss the real tragedy and ignore the toxic legacy of racism. Styron correctly identified racial anguish as the most profound moral dilemma in America [8]. For many years, the impact of racial discordance and prejudice in medicine was simply ignored. This case serves as a reminder of the multiple repercussions of our racial dilemma and the need to support both patients and professionals.


    AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Top
 Abstract
 Dialogue
 Commentary
 Author Contributions
 References
 
Conception/design: Lidia Schapira, Bruce Chabner

Provision of study materials: Lidia Schapira, Joanne LaFrancesca

Collection/assembly of data: Lidia Schapira

Data analysis: Lidia Schapira, Leah Gordon-Rowe, Rosalba Martignetti, Deborah Washington, Mimi Bartholomay, Donna Greenberg, Bruce Chabner

Manuscript writing: Lidia Schapira, Leah Gordon-Rowe, Rosalba Martignetti, Deborah Washington, Mimi Bartholomay, Donna Greenberg, Christopher Lathan, Joanne LaFrancesca, Thomas Lynch, Bruce Chabner

Final approval of manuscript: Lidia Schapira, Leah Gordon-Rowe, Rosalba Martignetti, Deborah Washington, Mimi Bartholomay, Donna Greenberg, Christopher Lathan, Joanne LaFrancesca, Thomas Lynch, Bruce Chabner


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Dialogue
 Commentary
 Author Contributions
 References
 

  1. Selby M. Ethical dilemma: Dealing with racist patients. BMJ 1999;318:1129.[Free Full Text]
  2. Neuberger J. Ethical dilemma: Dealing with racist patients. Commentary: A role for personal values and management. BMJ 1999;318:1130.[Medline]
  3. Easmon C. Ethical dilemma: Dealing with racist patients. Commentary: Isolate the problem. BMJ 1999;318:1130.[Medline]
  4. Gough P. Ethical dilemma: Dealing with racist patients. Commentary: Courteous containment is not enough. BMJ 1999;318:1131.[Medline]
  5. United States Census Bureau. Table 3: Annual Estimates of the Population by Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin for the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2007. Available at http://www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/NC-EST2007/NC-EST2007–03.xls. accessed August 8, 2008.
  6. Spratley E, Johnson A, Sochalski J et al. The Registered Nurse Population: Findings from the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses. Available at http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/reports/rnsurvey/default.htm. accessed August 8, 2008.
  7. Baker RB, Washington HA, Olakanmi O et al. African American physicians and organized medicine, 1846–1968: Origins of a racial divide. JAMA 2008;300:306–313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Styron W. Personal Essays. A literary forefather. Havannas in Camelot. New York: Random House, 2008:122.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
theoncologist.2008-0210v1
13/11/1177    most recent
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schapira, L.
Right arrow Articles by Chabner, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schapira, L.
Right arrow Articles by Chabner, B.


HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS