Advertisement
help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Oncologist, Vol. 13, No. 4, 382-389, April 2008; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0175
© 2008 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khanna, G.
Right arrow Articles by O'Dorisio, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khanna, G.
Right arrow Articles by O'Dorisio, M. S.

Cancer Imaging

Utility of Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Analogues for Staging/Restaging and Treatment of Somatostatin Receptor–Positive Pediatric Tumors

Geetika Khannaa, David Bushnella, M. Sue O'Dorisiob

Departments of aRadiology and bPediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA

Key Words. Somatostatin • Scintigraphy • Pentetreotide • Embryonal tumors • Neuroendocrine tumors • Pediatric

Correspondence: Geetika Khanna, M.D., M.S., Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA. Telephone: 319-356-1594; Fax: 319-356-2220; e-mail: geetika-khanna{at}uiowa.edu

Received September 24, 2007; accepted for publication February 15, 2008.

Disclosure: D.B. has acted as a consultant to Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals within the last 2 years. No other potential conflicts of interest were reported by the authors, planners, reviewers, or staff managers of this article.


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 SRS
 Specific Imaging Applications in...
 Therapeutic Applications
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 References
 
In this paper, we review the pediatric oncologic applications of somatostatin receptor–targeted imaging and therapy. Somatostatin receptors are expressed in high densities by embryonal tumors, such as neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma, and neuroendocrine tumors like carcinoids and islet cell tumors. We first review the distribution of these receptors in normal tissues and tumor cells. We then discuss the technique of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) in the pediatric population. Next, the specific clinical applications of SRS with regard to the imaging of neuroblastoma, central nervous system tumors, and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors of childhood are discussed. Finally, we discuss the potential role of somatostatin receptor–targeted radiotherapy for improving the duration and quality of life of children with these tumors.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
SRS
 Specific Imaging Applications in...
 Therapeutic Applications
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 References
 
Somatostatin, a peptide hormone, is the most widely distributed of the hypothalamic regulatory hormones [1]. It is present in the central and peripheral nervous systems, the gastrointestinal tract, and the pancreas. Somatostatin receptors (sstrs) have been identified on the surface of several cell types, such as pancreatic islet cells and thyroid C cells, and on tumor cells like those of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs). To date, five subtypes of sstrs have been cloned in human tissues: sstr1, sstr2, sstr3, sstr4, and sstr5. Because the half-life of somatostatin is very short (<2 minutes), its use for imaging is not practical. The availability of chelated synthetic analogues of somatostatin like indium-111 diethylentriaminepentaacetate (111In-DTPA)-octreotide and 111In-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)-lanreotide has enabled in vivo imaging of sstr-expressing tumors. These synthetic analogues of somatostatin have high affinity for sstrs, especially sstr2, and have a long half-life (on the order of several hours) allowing for their use as imaging agents. In adults, the primary application of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) has been in the evaluation of gastroenteropancreatic NETs like carcinoids and islet cell tumors, meningiomas, and neural crest tumors like paragangliomas. Among the childhood cancers, SRS has shown the most potential in the evaluation of embryonal tumors such as neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma, and supratentorial PNETs as well as NETs like carcinoids and pancreatic NETs [2]. These malignancies remain among the most challenging of all pediatric cancers, with recurrence and metastases occurring in >50% of embryonal tumors, while outcomes for NETs in the pediatric and young adult populations are not well documented [3, 4]. Consequently, new treatment options such as molecularly targeted radiotherapy are beginning to offer new hope for improving both the length and quality of life for these children.


   SRS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 SRS
Specific Imaging Applications in...
 Therapeutic Applications
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 References
 
The somatostatin analogue octreotide can be labeled with 111In through the DTPA ligand to form 111In-octreotide, also referred to as 111In-pentetreotide, or with iodine-123 (123I) complexed with tyrosine, 123I-Tyr3-octreotide. These radiopharmaceuticals bind with high affinity to sstr2 and with moderate affinity to sstr3 and sstr5. 111In-pentetreotide is the preferred radiopharmaceutical for the following reasons: 123I is not readily available and labeling of 123I to Tyr3 is cumbersome, 123I-Tyr3-octreotide has an initially longer plasma half-life, resulting in more background activity, and it is primarily cleared by the liver, resulting in more bowel activity [5–7]. The recommended administered activity of pentetreotide in children is 5 MBq/kg (0.14 mCi/kg) with a maximum of 222 MBq (6 mCi) in adults [8]. Images are acquired at 4 and 24 hours after injection. Planar and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images are acquired using a gamma camera fitted with a medium-energy collimator. Symmetrical 20% energy windows are centered over both photopeaks of 111In (173 and 247 keV) and the data from both windows are added. Like any other radiopharmaceutical, knowledge of the normal tissue accumulation of 111In-pentetreotide is essential in the interpretation of SRS. This tracer shows avidity for normal organs such as the pituitary, thyroid, spleen, liver, and renal parenchyma (Fig. 1). The gall bladder, bowel, renal collecting system, ureters, and bladder are seen as a result of clearance of 111In-pentetreotide.


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1. Normal distribution of 111In-pentetreotide. Whole body 4-hour anterior image in a 4-year-old shows normal activity in the pituitary, liver, spleen, and kidneys, and some bowel activity.

 

   SPECIFIC IMAGING APPLICATIONS IN PEDIATRIC MALIGNANCIES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 SRS
 Specific Imaging Applications in...
Therapeutic Applications
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 References
 
Neuroblastoma
Neuroblastoma, the most common NETs of childhood, is a typical example of an embryonal tumor of childhood [9]. Neuroblastoma and related tumors (ganglioneuroblastoma and ganglioneuroma) arise from the neural crest cells that colonize the sympathetic ganglia and adrenal medulla in fetal life. These neoplasms are characterized by an array of biological and clinical features ranging from spontaneous regression and differentiation into benign neoplasms in infants to potentially aggressive dissemination in older children. Accurate detection of bone and bone marrow metastases is very important because therapy and prognosis relate directly to their presence. Other prognostic factors include age at diagnosis and biological features, such as histopathology, tumor ploidy, and N-myc amplification [10].

sstrs, specifically sstr1 and sstr2, have been identified on neuroblastoma tumor cells [11, 12]. This allows sstr imaging of neuroblastoma for staging and restaging purposes (Fig. 2). However, the normal uptake of pentetreotide by the liver and spleen and its excretion through the hepatobiliary and genitourinary systems limit the utility of SRS in the detection of neural crest tumors. Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) remains the current standard for scintigraphic evaluation of neuroblastoma. MIBG is a guanethidine derivative and is structurally similar to norepinephrine. It is concentrated in sympathetic ganglia and the adrenal medulla and stored in catecholamine storage vesicles. MIBG scanning is considered by many investigators as the reference standard for detection of metastatic disease. It has been shown to have a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 98%–100% for the detection of bone marrow metastases [13, 14]. The largest series comparing scintigraphy with 123I-MIBG and SRS included 88 children with neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma [15]. The investigators found MIBG to be significantly more sensitive than SRS in tumor detection, with sensitivities of 94% and 64%, respectively. However, they showed that SRS provided significant prognostic information, with SRS positivity correlating with survival and event-free survival probability.


Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy of neuroblastoma in a 9-year-old boy with newly diagnosed neuroblastoma. Shown is a whole-body planar anterior image obtained 24 hours after injection of 3.4 mCi 111In-pentetreotide. Multiple foci of metastatic disease are noted in the skull, spine, humeri, pelvis, and femurs, in addition to a large abdominal mass consistent with stage IV disease.

 
The ratio of the activity of octreotide in the tumor versus the background on in vivo imaging, specifically the rate of increase in this ratio with time, has been shown to correlate with the density of sstr2 expression as determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction [16]. This allows for the use of SRS to determine sstr expression in the tumor in a noninvasive fashion. The clinical value of sstr2 as a prognostic marker lies in its ability to detect patients at low risk, independently of clinical stage, age at diagnosis, and N-myc amplification status [17]. In a series of 26 neuroblastoma patients, Briganti et al. [18] showed the density of sstr expression to be strongly related to survival, independently of N-myc oncogene amplification. They proposed that neuroblastoma imaging with SRS may have not only a diagnostic but also a prognostic value. O'Dorisio et al. [11] also showed a correlation among the presence of sstrs, stage of disease, and patient survival in a series of 26 neuroblastoma patients by in vitro analysis. However, they did not find a correlation between the presence of sstrs and N-myc oncogene amplification.

In summary, though MIBG scintigraphy remains the best scintigraphic method for the detection of neuroblastoma tissue, SRS has the potential to provide prognostic information in a minimally invasive fashion.

Central Nervous System Tumors
Brain tumors are the second most common pediatric malignancy, accounting for nearly 20% of all childhood tumors [19]. In the International Classification of Childhood Cancer, central nervous system (CNS) tumors are divided into six subgroups, with the main diagnostic groups being: astrocytomas, embryonal tumors, ependymomas, and other gliomas [20]. Embryonal tumors as a group have the worst prognosis and are comprised primarily of medulloblastoma and supratentorial PNETs. Embryonal tumors have consistently been shown to express the highest density of sstrs, specifically sstr2. This allows for promising applications of SRS in the diagnosis and surveillance of these tumors (Fig. 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 3. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy of a central nervous system embryonal tumor in a 3-year-old boy with headaches. (A): Axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scan demonstrates a mass occupying the fourth ventricle. (B): Axial 111In-pentetreotide single photon emission computed tomography image demonstrates intense radiotracer uptake within the mass. (C): Photomicrograph (20x) of immunohistochemistry slide shows staining for somatostatin receptor (brown stain). This was proven to be a medulloblastoma at pathology.

 
Initial reports on the application of SRS in the evaluation of CNS tumors focused on meningiomas and pituitary adenomas [21, 22]. This was followed by two reports, each reporting one case of medulloblastoma, suggesting high densities of sstrs in this neoplasm [23, 24]. In 1998, Müller et al. [25] reported on the expression of sstrs and the role of SRS in 20 children with medulloblastoma. All 14 medulloblastoma samples studied by autoradiography demonstrated uniformly high expression of sstrs in the tumor tissue. The sensitivity of SRS in this study was 88%, with a specificity of 100%. SRS was true negative in one patient with a false-positive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and the only patient with a false-negative SRS had a small drop metastasis. High expression of sstrs in central PNETs was subsequently confirmed by Frühwald et al. [26, 27], who evaluated seven children with supratentorial PNETs and found SRS to be more sensitive than conventional imaging in the detection of relapse in select cases. In a series of 20 pediatric brain tumors, SRS was shown to be a useful adjunct to MRI in the surveillance of sstr-positive malignancies, especially when the MRI findings were equivocal [28]. Though MRI is the most sensitive imaging modality for the detection of residual/recurrent medulloblastoma, SRS has been shown to be more specific because of its high-affinity binding to sstrs [29]. These studies suggest that SRS can provide useful molecular imaging information that can complement the information obtained from MRI, though more evidence is needed before the routine use of SRS in the surveillance of embryonal tumors can be recommended.

Data on the expression of sstrs on glial tumors are conflicting. While Reubi et al. [24] showed that sstrs are expressed by 82% of low-grade gliomas (World Health Organization [WHO] grade I and II) and only 2% of high-grade gliomas (WHO grade III and IV), these results have not been unanimously confirmed [30]. Mawrin et al. [31] demonstrated that the loss of differentiation of glial tumors was associated with greater expression of sstrs. Detection of glial tumors by SRS, however, depends not only on the expression of sstrs but also on the integrity of the blood–brain barrier because pentetreotide is a polar, water-soluble peptide [32]. Schmidt et al. [22] concluded that, although nearly all gliomas express sstrs, only high-grade gliomas with disruption of the blood–brain barrier show significant uptake of the radiopharmaceutical. Scintigraphic findings in gliomas should be interpreted with caution because uptake depends both on the status of the blood–brain barrier and the expression of sstrs on the tumor. There is limited information on the expression of sstrs in ependymomas. Though ependymomas have been shown to express sstrs, predominantly sstr2, the level of expression is variable and generally lower than that seen in embryonal tumors [33].

Gastroenteropancreatic NETs
Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NETs arise from neuroendocrine cells found in the pancreas, the gut, and its derivatives like the bronchial tree. NETS encompass carcinoid tumors, islet cell tumors, and amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation tumors. GEP-NETs have traditionally been classified into pancreatic tumors and carcinoids, which are further subdivided based on location as foregut, midgut, or hindgut tumors. They may also be classified based on symptoms as functional or nonfunctional tumors. In 2000, however, a more prognostically useful classification system was proposed by the WHO, based on tumor histology: 1a, well-differentiated NETs, which show benign behavior; 1b, well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), which are characterized by low-grade malignancy; and 2, poorly differentiated NECs of high-grade malignancy [34].

GEP-NETs are rare in the pediatric population, accounting for <1% of all pediatric malignancies [35]. The most common sites of GEP-NETs in the pediatric population are the appendix and bronchial tree, and liver metastases with unknown primary [35, 36]. There is limited information in the pediatric literature regarding the imaging findings of GEP-NETs [37]. Most of the information regarding imaging of these tumors is obtained from adult studies. The quoted diagnostic performance of different imaging modalities in various studies is highly variable, depending on local expertise, different stages of technology development, and the imaging protocols used. The overexpression of sstrs and the presence of amine uptake and storage mechanisms allow targeted molecular imaging of NETs using SRS and MIBG, respectively. SRS has been shown to be more sensitive than MIBG scintigraphy in the detection of GEP-NETs, with sensitivities in the range of 78%–100% and 36%–85%, respectively [38, 39]. Specifically, MIBG has been shown to have limited accuracy in the detection of pancreatic NETs, though it may be useful in the detection of midgut NETs [38]. Also, nonfunctional NETs have been shown to have lower affinity for MIBG than functional tumors; however, no such difference has been seen in pentetreotide uptake. SRS is currently the modality of choice in the detection of the primary tumor, the evaluation of the extent of disease, monitoring treatment effects, and selecting patients for targeted therapy (Fig. 4) [40].


Figure 4
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 4. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy of a gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in a 6-year-old girl with a history of abdominal pain and diarrhea for several months. (A) Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy single photon emission computed tomography image obtained 24 hours after i.v. administration of 111In-pentetreotide in the axial plane shows an intense focus of increased uptake adjacent to the gall bladder (G), which corresponds to a mass seen at the porta hepatis (arrow) on axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography (B). Also note the thickening of the gastric folds as a result of hypergastrinemia. This is a surgically proven pancreatic gastrinoma.

 
However, there are limitations to SRS. There is considerable variation in sstr subtype expression among different tumor types and also heterogeneous expression in tumors of the same type [41]. Most gastrinomas, but only half of insulinomas, express sstrs. The small size of the primary tumor and their tendency to occur anywhere along the gastroenteropancreatic system can make tumor detection a challenge. Coregistration of data from molecular and anatomic modalities or hybrid imaging with SPECT-CT or position emission tomography (PET)-CT can aid in the accurate localization of disease, detection of small lesions, and determination of areas of physiologic uptake. Fusion imaging with SPECT-CT has been shown to be more accurate than either SPECT or CT alone and can result in management changes in 14%–28% of patients [42, 43]. The development of PET radiopharmaceuticals, like gallium-68-labeled 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N''',N'''-tetraacetic acid-D-Phe1-Tyr 3-octreotide (68Ga-DOTA-TOC), for detecting NETs is of great interest as they can offer better spatial resolution than with SPECT and the opportunity to evaluate various aspects of NET biochemistry in vivo [44]. The development of novel PET and SPECT radiopharmaceuticals and incorporation of fusion imaging in everyday practice could lead to further improvements in the detection and staging of GEP-NETs.

Other Imaging Applications
sstrs have been identified on lymphoma cells by in vitro studies, allowing for the in vivo evaluation of Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by SRS [45]. However, with the increasing availability of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG)-PET at most centers, and better resolution of PET imaging compared with SPECT, 18FDG-PET has essentially become the imaging modality of choice in the evaluation of lymphoma, even in children. SRS has been successfully used to image other malignancies like medullary thyroid carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, paragangliomas, and pituitary adenomas. These tumors are primarily seen in adults. However, occasionally they can occur in children, especially in the presence of multiple endocrine neoplastic syndromes like von Hippel-Lindau disease (GEP-NETs and pheochromocytoma), neurofibromatosis type I (pheochromocytoma), multiple endocrine neoplasia I (pituitary adenoma, pancreatic islet cells tumors), and multiple endocrine neoplasia II (medullary thyroid carcinoma, pheochromocytoma) [46].


   THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 SRS
 Specific Imaging Applications in...
 Therapeutic Applications
Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 References
 
Besides imaging, radiolabeled analogues of somatostatin offer the potential for use in the treatment of patients with advanced stage sstr-expressing tumors. Although 111In emits low-energy electrons that have some treatment potential, radionuclides such as yttrium-90 (90Y) and lutetium-177 (177Lu), which emit higher energy electrons through a process known as beta decay, are generally felt to be better suited for therapeutic purposes. 90Y has been labeled to a Tyr3-octreopeptide identical, except for the Tyr3, to the octreopeptide in the imaging agent 111In-pentetreotide. For this therapeutic drug, a dodecane tetraacetic acid derivative (DOTA) is used as the chelator to link 90Y to the octreopeptide. DOTA provides a stronger bond between 90Y and the octreopeptide, resulting in a more stable complex than the corresponding DTPA-linked molecule 111In-pentetreotide. The resulting radioactive drug, 90Y-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide, is currently known generically as 90Y-edotreotide (also referred to in the literature as SMT-487 or 90Y-DOTATOC). 177Lu has been linked to a very similar octreopeptide known as octreotate.

Studies have demonstrated that 90Y-DOTATOC has a several-fold higher binding affinity for sstr2 on most NETs relative to 111In-pentetreotide [47]. Unlike other targeted radiotherapeutic drugs, including 131I-MIBG, dosage-limiting normal organ toxicity is typically seen in the kidneys with 90Y-DOTATOC, as opposed to the bone marrow. 90Y-DOTATOC is administered i.v. over a 20- or 30-minute period, and is usually given in multiple 6–8 week cycles separated by 2–3 months in time. From a radiation safety standpoint, patients can be treated in an outpatient setting because 90Y does not emit gamma radiation.

131I-MIBG, 90Y-DOTATOC, and 177Lu-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE) have all shown substantial promise in treating adult patients with NETs not responsive to other treatments [48–52]. Although objective tumor response data are limited for 131I-MIBG, studies have demonstrated similar overall response rates for these three agents in the range of 20%–50%, depending somewhat on tumor type and the specific administration protocol [53–55].

Currently, there is much greater experience treating adults with NETs using 90Y-DOTATOC, or the similar agent 177Lu-DOTATATE, than there is treating children. The results, however, in adults have been highly encouraging, with improvements seen in clinical status and quality of life in addition to evidence of prolonged survival even though, as stated above, overall objective response rates have been modest [56, 57].

The largest experience in the field of targeted radionuclide therapy in children with NETs, and more specifically chemotherapy-refractory neuroblastoma, has been with high-dosage 131I-MIBG [58–60]. While results with this radioactive drug are often good, many children with chemotherapy-refractory disease do not respond significantly to 131I-MIBG. Moreover, studies have demonstrated discordant uptake patterns of MIBG versus octreopeptides in some patients with NETs [61]. In adults at least, many patients with NETs, especially those with pancreatic tumors, show better targeting with the octreopeptides than with MIBG [62]. Consequently, there may be an important role in the pediatric setting for agents such as 90Y-DOTATOC or 177Lu-DOTATATE, which have distinctly different tumor cell targeting mechanisms than MIBG. Notably, successful treatment of a child with medulloblastoma using 90Y-DOTATOC administered intrathecally was recently reported [63].

We are currently conducting a phase I trial of 90Y-DOTATOC to treat children with advanced stage embryonal and neuroendocrine malignancies. The primary criterion for treatment in this study is tumor uptake equal to or greater than that of the liver on pretherapy 111In-pentetreotide images. Side effects from this therapy have so far been limited to nausea/vomiting at the time of treatment because of the coadministration of an amino acid solution designed to reduce renal radiation exposure from 90Y-DOTATOC, with no evidence to date of renal or bone marrow toxicity. In adults, a small fraction of individuals may go on to develop chronic renal insufficiency as a result of this treatment, with preliminary results suggesting less renal toxicity from 177Lu-DOTATATE than from 90Y-DOTATOC [64]. To help reduce the potential for renal toxicity from these agents, cationic amino acid solutions are routinely administered at the time of treatment. Such amino acid solutions have been shown to reduce kidney uptake of radiolabeled octreopeptides on the order of 20%–30% [65].


   CONCLUSION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 SRS
 Specific Imaging Applications in...
 Therapeutic Applications
 Conclusion
Author Contributions
 References
 
In conclusion, radiolabeled octreopeptides have advanced our ability to care for children with sstr-expressing tumors, principally NETs. Imaging applications are already used in routine clinical practice, and a phase I clinical trial of 90Y-DOTATOC is currently in progress. Other radiolabeled peptides that harbor both imaging and therapeutic potential are currently under active study and will hopefully soon be added to our armamentarium of molecularly targeted therapies for childhood malignancies.


   AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 SRS
 Specific Imaging Applications in...
 Therapeutic Applications
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
References
 
Manuscript writing: Geetika Khanna, David Bushnell, M. Sue O'Dorisio

Final approval of manuscript: Geetika Khanna, David Bushnell, M. Sue O'Dorisio


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 SRS
 Specific Imaging Applications in...
 Therapeutic Applications
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 References
 

  1. Epelbaum J. Somatostatin in the central nervous system: Physiology and pathological modifications. Prog Neurobiol 1986;27:63–100.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Pashankar FD, O'Dorisio MS, Menda Y. MIBG and somatostatin receptor analogs in children: Current concepts on diagnostic and therapeutic use. J Nucl Med 2005;46(suppl 1):55S–61S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Matthay KK. Neuroblastoma: A clinical challenge and biologic puzzle. CA Cancer J Clin 1995;45:179–192.[Abstract]
  4. Reddy AT, Janss AJ, Phillips PC et al. Outcome for children with supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors treated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Cancer 2000;88:2189–2193.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Bakker WH, Krenning EP, Reubi JC et al. In vivo application of [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-octreotide for detection of somatostatin receptor-positive tumors in rats. Life Sci 1991;49:1593–1601.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Bakker WH, Krenning EP, Breeman WA et al. Receptor scintigraphy with a radioiodinated somatostatin analogue: Radiolabeling, purification, biologic activity, and in vivo application in animals. J Nucl Med 1990;31:1501–1509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bakker WH, Albert R, Bruns C et al. [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-octreotide, a potential radiopharmaceutical for imaging of somatostatin receptor-positive tumors: Synthesis, radiolabeling and in vitro validation. Life Sci 1991;49:1583–1591.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Balon HR, Goldsmith SJ, Siegel BA et al. Procedure guideline for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with (111)In-pentetreotide. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1134–1138.[Free Full Text]
  9. Spix C, Pastore G, Sankila R et al. Neuroblastoma incidence and survival in European children (1978–1997): Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:2081–2091.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Brodeur GM. Neuroblastoma: Biological insights into a clinical enigma. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:203–216.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. O'Dorisio MS, Chen F, O'Dorisio TM et al. Characterization of somatostatin receptors on human neuroblastoma tumors. Cell Growth Differ 1994;5:1–8.[Abstract]
  12. Albers AR, O'Dorisio MS, Balster DA et al. Somatostatin receptor gene expression in neuroblastoma. Regul Pept 2000;88:61–73.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Lumbroso J, Guermazi F, Hartmann O et al. [Sensitivity and specificity of meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) scintigraphy in the evaluation of neuroblastoma: Analysis of 115 cases]. Bull Cancer 1988;75:97–106; French.[Medline]
  14. Hoefnagel CA. Metaiodobenzylguanidine and somatostatin in oncology: Role in the management of neural crest tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 1994;21:561–581.[Medline]
  15. Schilling FH, Bihl H, Jacobsson H et al. Combined (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy and (123)I-mIBG scintigraphy in neuroblastoma provides prognostic information. Med Pediatr Oncol 2000;35:688–691.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Orlando C, Raggi CC, Bagnoni L et al. Somatostatin receptor type 2 gene expression in neuroblastoma, measured by competitive RT-PCR, is related to patient survival and to somatostatin receptor imaging by indium-111-pentetreotide. Med Pediatr Oncol 2001;36:224–226.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Raggi CC, Maggi M, Renzi D et al. Quantitative determination of sst2 gene expression in neuroblastoma tumor predicts patient outcome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:3866–3873.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Briganti V, Sestini R, Orlando C et al. Imaging of somatostatin receptors by indium-111-pentetreotide correlates with quantitative determination of somatostatin receptor type 2 gene expression in neuroblastoma tumors. Clin Cancer Res 1997;3:2385–2391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Statistical Report: Primary Brain Tumors in the United States, 1998–2002, 2005–2006, Hinsdale, IL: Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, 2005:1-55.
  20. Steliarova-Foucher E, Stiller C, Lacour B et al. International Classification of Childhood Cancer, third edition. Cancer 2005;103:1457–1467.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Scheidhauer K, Hildebrandt G, Luyken C et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in brain tumors and pituitary tumors: First experiences. Horm Metab Res Suppl 1993;27:59–62.[Medline]
  22. Schmidt M, Scheidhauer K, Luyken C et al. Somatostatin receptor imaging in intracranial tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25:675–686.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Lee JD, Kim DI, Lee JT et al. Indium-111-pentetreotide imaging in intra-axial brain tumors: Comparison with thallium-201 SPECT and MRI. J Nucl Med 1995;36:537–541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Reubi JC, Lang W, Maurer R et al. Distribution and biochemical characterization of somatostatin receptors in tumors of the human central nervous system. Cancer Res 1987;47:5758–5764.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Müller HL, Frühwald MC, Scheubeck M et al. A possible role for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the diagnosis and follow-up of children with medulloblastoma. J Neurooncol 1998;38:27–40.[Medline]
  26. Frühwald MC, O'Dorisio MS, Pietsch T et al. High expression of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sst2) in medulloblastoma: Implications for diagnosis and therapy. Pediatr Res 1999;45:697–708.[Medline]
  27. Frühwald MC, Rickert CH, O'Dorisio MS et al. Somatostatin receptor subtype 2 is expressed by supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors of childhood and can be targeted for somatostatin receptor imaging. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:2997–3006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Khanna G, O'Dorisio MS, Menda Y et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in surveillance of pediatric brain malignancies. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008;50:561–566.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Yüksel M, Lutterbey G, Biersack HJ et al. 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy in medulloblastoma: A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Oncol 2007;46:111–117.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Luyken C, Hildebrandt G, Scheidhauer K et al. 111Indium (DTPA-octreotide) scintigraphy in patients with cerebral gliomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994;127:60–64.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Mawrin C, Schulz S, Pauli SU et al. Differential expression of sst1, sst2A, and sst3 somatostatin receptor proteins in low-grade and high-grade astrocytomas. J. Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2004;63:13–19.[Medline]
  32. Haldemann AR, Rösler H, Barth A et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in central nervous system tumors: Role of blood-brain barrier permeability. J Nucl Med 1995;36:403–410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Guyotat J, Champier J, Jouvet A et al. Differential expression of somatostatin receptors in ependymoma: Implications for diagnosis. Int J Cancer 2001;95:144–151.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Klöppel G, Perren A, Heitz PU. The gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine cell system and its tumors: The WHO classification. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004;1014:13–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Spunt SL, Pratt CB, Rao BN et al. Childhood carcinoid tumors: The St Jude Children's Research Hospital experience. J Pediatr Surg 2000;35:1282–1286.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Broaddus RR, Herzog CE, Hicks MJ. Neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoid and neuroendocrine carcinoma) presenting at extra-appendiceal sites in childhood and adolescence. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127:1200–1203.[Medline]
  37. Khanna G, O'Dorisio MS, Menda Y et al. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in children and young adults. Pediatr Radiol 2008;38:251–259.[Medline]
  38. Ezziddin S, Logvinski T, Yong-Hing C et al. Factors predicting tracer uptake in somatostatin receptor and MIBG scintigraphy of metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med 2006;47:223–233.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Kaltsas GA, Mukherjee JJ, Grossman AB. The value of radiolabelled MIBG and octreotide in the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumours. Ann Oncol 2001;12(suppl 2):S47–S50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Guillermet-Guibert J, Lahlou H, Pyronnet S et al. Endocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Somatostatin receptors as tools for diagnosis and therapy: Molecular aspects. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2005;19:535–551.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Reubi JC. Peptide receptors as molecular targets for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Endocr Rev 2003;24:389–427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Pfannenberg AC, Eschmann SM, Horger M et al. Benefit of anatomical-functional image fusion in the diagnostic work-up of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:835–843.[Medline]
  43. Krausz Y, Keidar Z, Kogan I et al. SPECT/CT hybrid imaging with 111In-pentetreotide in assessment of neuroendocrine tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2003;59:565–573.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Gabriel M, Decristoforo C, Kendler D et al. 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in neuroendocrine tumors: Comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT. J Nucl Med 2007;48:508–518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Cholewinski W, Kowalczyk JR, Stefaniak B et al. Diagnosis and staging of children's lymphoma using the technetium-labelled somatostatin analogue, 99mTc-depreotide. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:820–824.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. de Krijger RR. Endocrine tumor syndromes in infancy and childhood. Endocr Pathol 2004;15:223–226.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Reubi J, Macke H, Krenning E. Candidates for peptide receptor radiotherapy today and in the future. J Nucl Med 2005;46(suppl 1):67S–75S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Waldherr C, Pless M, Maecke HR et al. Tumor response and clinical benefit in neuroendocrine tumors after 7.4 GBq 90Y -DOTATOC. J Nucl Med 2002;43:610–616.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Otte A, Herrmann R, Heppeler A et al. Yttrium-90 DOTATOC: First clinical results. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:1439–1447.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Teunissen JJ, Kwekkeboom DJ, Krenning EP. Quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic tumors treated with [177Lu-OTA0,Tyr3]octreotate. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2724–2729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Safford SD, Coleman RE, Gockerman JP et al. Iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine treatment for metastatic carcinoid. Results in 98 patients. Cancer 2004;101:1987–1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Sywak MS, Pasieka JL, McEwan A et al. 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine in the management of metastatic midget carcinoid tumors. World J Surg 2004;28:1157–1162.[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Kwekkeboom DJ, Mueller-Brand J, Paganelli G et al. Overview of results of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 3 radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. J Nucl Med 2005;46(suppl 1):62S–66S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Bomanji JB, Wong W, Gaze MN et al. Treatment of neuroendocrine tumours in adults with 131I-MIBG therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2003;15:193–198.[Medline]
  55. Kwekkeboom DJ, Teunissen JJ, Bakker WH et al. Radiolabeled somatostatin analog [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate in patients with endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2754–2762.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Bushnell D, O'Dorisio T, Menda Y et al. Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of 90Y-SMT 487 in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1556–1560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Valkema R, Pauwels S, Kvols LK et al. Survival and response after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide in patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Nucl Med 2006;36:147–156.[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Howard JP, Maris JM, Kersun LS et al. Tumor response and toxicity with multiple infusions of high dose 131I-MIBG for refractory neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005;44:232–239.[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Lashford LS, Lewis IJ, Fielding SL et al. Phase I/II study of iodine 131 metaiodobenzylguanidine in chemoresistant neuroblastoma: A United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group investigation. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1889–1896.[Abstract]
  60. Matthay KK, Panina C, Huberty J et al. Correlation of tumor and whole-body dosimetry with tumor response and toxicity in refractory neuroblastoma treated with 131I-MIBG. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1713–1721.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Quigley AM, Buscombe JR, Gopinath G et al. In-vivo characterisation of the functional aspects of carcinoid tumors by imaging somatostatin receptors and amine uptake. J Nucl Med 2003;44(suppl 5):74P.
  62. Taal BG, Hoefnagel CA, Valdés Olmos RA et al. Combined diagnostic imaging with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine and 111In-pentetreotide in carcinoid tumours. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A:1924–1932.[CrossRef]
  63. Beutler D, Avoledo P, Reubi JC et al. Three-year recurrence-free survival in a patient with recurrent medulloblastoma after resection, high-dose chemotherapy, and intrathecal yttrium-90-labeled DOTA0-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide radiopeptide brachytherapy. Cancer 2005;103:869–873.[Medline]
  64. Valkema R, Pauwels SA, Kvols LK et al. Long-term follow-up of renal function after peptide receptor radiation therapy with 90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3-octreotide and 177Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3-octreotate. J Nucl Med 2005;46(suppl 1):83S–91S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Rolleman EJ, Valkema R, de Jong M et al. Safe and effective inhibition of renal uptake of radiolabeled octreotide by a combination of lysine and arginine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag 2003;30:9–15.[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khanna, G.
Right arrow Articles by O'Dorisio, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khanna, G.
Right arrow Articles by O'Dorisio, M. S.

HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS