help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
The Oncologist, Vol. 2, No. 1, 62-63, February 1997
© 1997 AlphaMed Press


SPECIAL SECTION
NEWS AND SPECIAL REPORTS

News Bulletin


    AGGRESSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY USE COULD REDUCE MORTALITY, RESEARCHER SAYS
 Top
 Aggressive Chemotherapy Use...
 U.S. National Cancer Institute...
 BCG Vaccine and Letrozole...
 
Chemotherapy has not been applied as aggressively as it might be in the treatment of breast cancer, and if it were used more consistently, more than half the annual deaths from the disease could be prevented, a researcher said at a symposium in New York City. "We now have the means of controlling this scourge," said Ezra Greenspan of Mount Sinai School of Medicine. If aggressive chemotherapy were used more consistently, "25,000 of the 40,000 annual deaths from breast cancer could be prevented," he said. Though chemotherapy for breast cancer was introduced in the 1960s, it was not adopted on any scale until the mid-1970s, Greenspan said in remarks to the Breast Cancer Minisymposium at the Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium XIV held in December.

Due to the fact that even high-risk patients were often not appropriately treated with chemotherapy, and the fact that mortality statistics take as long as 10 to 15 years to mature, proof of the benefit of chemotherapy was not available until the 1990s, Greenspan said. Mortality rates began to fall in 1989, and have continued to progressively decline in England and the U.S. Referring to the use of tamoxifen, as well as chemotherapy, he said, "Now, at long last, there is proof of the benefit of chemohormonal therapy." Between 1989 and 1993, mortality dropped more than 14% among white women 40 to 50 years of age in Great Britain. In the U.S. during the same period, the largest reduction was 13.5% among white women 30 to 40 years of age. Overall reductions in breast cancer mortality for all age groups during that six-year period were 7% in England and 5.8% in the U.S. Unfortunately, black women and those in Third World ethnic groups did not experience similar reductions in mortality, at least up to 1994.

Despite encouraging data demonstrating that stage III disease was highly responsive to combination chemotherapy and that long-term survival and "virtual" clinical cure were surprisingly high, the media and advocacy groups appeared to have targeted chemotherapy for intense negative publicity, Greenspan said. Focusing on the toxicities and hazards of chemotherapy for women with breast cancer, the media obscured the overall risk-versus-benefit picture, Greenspan said. Moreover, increased utilization of mammography during the 1980s has led to more frequent detection of low-risk early stage tumors and has contributed to the public’s perception of a breast cancer "epidemic," he said. According to Greenspan, the flat survival curve in years 10 to 20 after successful treatment for breast cancer represents what is essentially clinical cure of the disease. Mortality 20 to 30 years after treatment is confounded by noncancer-related deaths, he observed. The public needs to be informed that virtual clinical cure can be achieved in the majority of women with breast cancer, Greenspan said. Even when the disease is advanced, he pointed out, 30% to 40% of high-risk patients are successfully treated. "The mere designation of breast cancer as a potentially curable disease will accelerate the more widespread application of aggressive and improved methods of therapy," Greenspan concluded. {blacktriangleup}


    U.S. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE EXPANDS TAXOL® AGREEMENT
 Top
 Aggressive Chemotherapy Use...
 U.S. National Cancer Institute...
 BCG Vaccine and Letrozole...
 
The U.S. National Cancer Institute and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (BMS) said they are expanding collaborative research in the development of the drug Taxol® (paclitaxel). A recent agreement between the Institute and BMS transfers exclusive rights to three NCI inventions relating to Taxol® to BMS for future development, the company said. The three new areas of collaboration are studies of Taxol® with G-CSF, Taxol® in combination therapies, and long-term infusion of Taxol® in the treatment of breast cancer. Under the updated Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA), BMS will pay NCI an estimated $30 million in royalties, research support, and patient enrollment costs, the company said. The company also supplies the drug to the Institute. The agreement has no bearing on the five-year market exclusivity period for Taxol®. When exclusivity expires in December 1997, other players are expected to introduce generic versions of the drug. However, by expanding its Taxol®-related investigations with NCI, BMS sets the agenda for research on the drug. In fact, after transferring to BMS the rights to three inventions related to Taxol®, the Institute is precluded from collaborations with other partners in these areas of research.

Though the new CRADA between BMS and NCI will expire in December 1997, officials at the company and the Institute said the door would be open to extending the collaboration. "Taxol® is one of the most significant cancer therapies available today, and we’ve only begun to scratch the surface of the drug’s full benefit for cancer patients," NCI Director Richard Klausner said in a statement. "Taxol® has proven to be a far more important drug than was originally envisioned in 1988, when a CRADA partner was first sought by the NCI," said Michael Loberg, president of BMS Oncology and Immunology division. "BMS remains committed to the research and development of Taxol® in order to further realize the drug’s cancer-fighting potential."

NCI and BMS collaborated in the development of Taxol®, obtaining FDA approval for the ovarian cancer indication at the end of 1992, only 24 months after the original CRADA partnership was approved. Since initial approval, BMS and the NCI have sponsored an additional 500 clinical trials involving 25,000 patients, the company said. Taxol® is approved in the U.S. for breast and ovarian cancer indications, and is available in more than 50 countries, the company said. {blacktriangleup}


    BCG VACCINE AND LETROZOLE ON TRACK FOR U.S. APPROVAL
 Top
 Aggressive Chemotherapy Use...
 U.S. National Cancer Institute...
 BCG Vaccine and Letrozole...
 
A panel of advisors to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommended marketing approval for a BCG vaccine for prevention of bladder cancer and letrozole for treatment of advanced breast cancer. The FDA Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted 9-1, with one abstention, to recommend marketing approval for TICE BCG, sponsored by Organon Teknika Corp., for intravesical installation for prophylaxis against recurrent papillary carcinoma of the bladder. In a second action, the committee voted 10-0, with one abstention, to recommend marketing approval for Femara tablets (letrozole), sponsored by Ciba-Geigy, for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in women with natural or artificially induced postmenopausal status, following antiestrogen therapy.

TICE BCG, an attenuated, live culture preparation of the Bacillus of Calamette and Guerin strain of Mycobacterium bovis, was approved by the FDA in 1990 for carcinoma in situ of the bladder. However, TICE BCG is widely used in the U.S. off-label for prevention of bladder tumor recurrence.

To obtain FDA marketing approval for this indication, Organon Teknika submitted data from two prospective, randomized, controlled studies to the agency. The trials were the Nijmegen study, conducted in the Netherlands, and a trial conducted in the U.S. by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG). Both studies compared TICE BCG with Mutamycin (mitomycin C, MMC), by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Both enrolled patients with transitional cell carcinomas, the most common type of bladder tumor.

The SWOG trial (SWOG 8795) enrolled 469 patients, of which 447 were eligible. The recurrence rate for patients taking TICE BCG was 40.3%, compared to 54.3% for those taking MMC (p = 0.017). Median time to recurrence was 44 months for the BCG group, compared to 22 months for the MMC group. Of the BCG group, 7.8% progressed while on therapy, compared to 12.9% of those taking MMC. Nearly half the patients enrolled in the SWOG trial had TaG1 tumors, said Donald Lamm of SWOG. Of those patients, 52% recurred while taking BCG, while 60% recurred while taking MMC. The times to recurrence were 36 months for those on BCG and 13 months for those on MMC. The differences were not statistically significant, but indicated a trend favoring BCG, Lamm said. Of those patients with CIS, 55% responded to BCG, while 46% responded to MMC. TICE BCG resulted in more side effects than MMC, including dysuria, fever, malaise, and cystitis. About 5% of patients taking BCG will develop serious toxicity, Lamm said.

Organon recommends TICE BCG for selected patient groups: those with grade 3 TCC, Ta or T1; stage T1 TCC, grades 1 through 3; recurrent disease, grade 2; or multiple Ta, grade 1 tumors, with recurrence despite resection.

An analysis of the SWOG trial by the FDA agreed with the company’s presentation that TICE BCG was superior to MMC in reducing the tumor recurrence rate and median disease-free survival. However, FDA concluded that TICE BCG was not equivalent, but inferior to MMC in the Nijmegen study, agency reviewers Sheldon Morris and Richard Steffen said. In addition, it was concerned about the use of MMC as a comparison, because the drug has not been approved for this indication.

In the Nijmegen trial, with 469 patients, only 22% had TaG1 tumors. The trial compared three treatment arms: TICE BCG, BCG-RIVM, and MMC. Tumor recurrence rate was 44% for patients on TICE BCG, 34% for BCG-RIVM, and 29% for MMC. Median disease-free survival was 2.8 years for those on TICE BCG, and was not reached for the other two arms.

For patients with high grade tumors, those treated with TICE BCG had a 47% recurrence rate, compared to 36% for BCG-RIVM and 30% for MMC. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.04). Michael Hanna, of Organon Teknika, noted that there were several differences between the studies, neither of which were sponsored by Organon. The Nijmegen study did not select patients, was not stratified, and had no provision for maintenance therapy of BCG.

The SWOG study selected for high-risk patients, based on the grade, stage, and rate of tumor recurrence. The SWOG trial also was stratified according to those patients with CIS and those without, and included nine months of maintenance therapy of BCG. In addition, the dose of mitomycin C used by the two groups ranged from 0.6 mg/ml in Nijmegen to 1 mg/ml in SWOG, Hanna said.

ODAC members said that although the Nijmegen trial did not prove TICE BCG activity in the prevention and recurrence of Ta and T1 tumors, the SWOG study did prove the drug’s activity, and, overall, the data supported the safety and efficacy of the drug. Many committee members said the indication should not be restricted, though they personally would not recommend using TICE BCG to prevent grade 1 tumors.

The FDA asked the committee for recommendations about methods to minimize the risk of nosocomial infection. The committee said labeling could include a warning about not mixing BCG under the same hood as chemotherapeutic agents. The company said the risk of infection is minimized by a new needle-free administration device for TICE BCG. {blacktriangleup}


    FOOTNOTES
 Top
 Aggressive Chemotherapy Use...
 U.S. National Cancer Institute...
 BCG Vaccine and Letrozole...
 
© 1997 The Cancer Letter, Inc., publishers of: The Cancer Letter with Cancer Economics and The Clinical Cancer Letter. P.O. Box 9905, Washington, DC 20016 USA; Telephone: 202-362-1809; Fax: 202-362-1681; Internet: subscrib@www.cancerletter.com





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS