© 1997 AlphaMed Press
Use of Cord Blood Cells for Banking and Transplanta Bone Marrow Transplant Unit; b Department of Biostatistics, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France, on behalf of EUROCORD Transplant Group Correspondence: Eliane G. Gluckman, M.D., Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75475 Paris Cedex 10, France. Telephone: 33-1-42-49-96-44; Fax: 33-1-42-49-96-34.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation has been used to treat thousands of patients, both adults and children, who have life-threatening hematological diseases. The principal limitations of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) are, for the majority of patients, the lack of suitable HLA-matched donors and the complications of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) associated with HLA mismatches. The lack of an HLA-identical sibling donor in 70% of the cases has been overcome through the establishment of registries of potential marrow donors. These registries, however, often are restricted in terms of HLA polymorphism and ethnic diversity. Despite a bone marrow donor registry which contains >3.7 million donors worldwide, some patients cannot be transplanted because of the lack of a suitable HLA-identical donor. New approaches have been investigated, including the use of HLA partially mismatched, T cell-depleted, mobilized peripheral blood HSC or umbilical cord HSC. The expected advantages of using umbilical cord HSC for transplantation are the enrichment of immature progenitor HSC, which should facilitate engraftment [1, 2], and the immaturity of the immune system at birth, which should decrease the incidence and severity of GVHD [3]. Cord blood HSC have distinctive proliferative advantages including increased cell cycle rate, production of autocrine growth factors, and increased telomere length. The small number and the relative immaturity of cord blood T cells should reduce the risk and severity of GVHD [3]. This feature may permit a greater degree of HLA disparity between donor and recipient than is usually accepted with adult blood or marrow HSC transplantation.
Since the first cord blood transplant performed in 1988 [4], cord blood transplantation has been increasingly used as a new source of HSC, and more than 200 transplants have been reported. To develop and evaluate cord blood transplant results, the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation group (EBMT) organized a concerted action, the EUROCORD group. The objectives of EUROCORD are given in Table 1
In Europe, cord blood banking has been developed in several countries, including France, the United Kingdom, Belgium, The Netherlands, and Spain. Other local banks have been collecting cord blood mainly for related transplants. At this time there are no known private banks or banks that collect cord blood for autologous use. As of April 1997, the Bone Marrow Donor Worldwide network offered 8,454 cord blood types, 3,585 from Europe and 4,869 from the United States.
The issue of informed consent and its purpose have been debated. It is generally agreed that cord and placental blood is a discarded product and can be used without asking permission, but informed consent must be asked if tests are to be done on either maternal or cord blood. In some countries, the womans informed consent is solicited after delivery and, if it is obtained, a full medical history is taken and a blood sample drawn to test for infectious disease markers. In other countries, information on cord blood donation for allogeneic use is given before delivery and the informed consent process done in advance. This gives the blood banks the opportunity to exclude donors with a high risk of transmitting infectious or genetic diseases. There have been some concerns about the process of informing the family about the results of infectious and genetic disease screening. Another issue is the follow-up of the donor and, in some cases, the possibility for the family to retrieve the autologous cord blood.
Two collection techniques are used: one collects cord blood in the delivery room while the placenta is still in the uterus; the other collects cord blood in an adjacent room after delivery [5, 6]. Both techniques have advantages and disadvantages (Table 2
Tests for syphilis and other viral diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) are done on the maternal blood. Some countries require additional tests. Usually, virology tests are not done immediately on cord blood, but on a separate aliquot kept to be tested before transplantation. Considerable discussion has been engaged on the risk of collecting infected cord blood during the period before seroconversion. When possible, cord blood is quarantined until a confirmatory test is done on the woman three to six months after delivery. In other cases, very sensitive tests, including viral antigen or nucleic acid-screening tests, are used before the transplant and should considerably decrease the risk of viral transmission. The risk of transmitting viral infection has been described recently [7]. The risk might be greater in cord blood donors because of the different recruitment of the donor population. Bacterial infection is also a major issue, but it seems that the frequency of bacterial contamination decreases with the expertise of the staff doing the collection. In all cases, bacterial culture for bacteria must be performed and the results sent to the transplant physician when the cord blood is delivered for transplant. Testing for genetic diseases should be directed by the family history, the ethnic background, and the follow-up of the donor. Tests on cord blood are expensive, and there is no consensus on the type and number of tests that should be done. There are some concerns, too, about relaying the results to the family. Recent studies have shown that the presence of maternal cells in cord blood is very frequent, and the detection depends on the sensitivity of the technique used [8, 9]. With very sensitive techniques, maternal cells are always detected in low numbers in cord blood. Some researchers believe that maternal cells might engraft, resulting in GVHD in the recipient. So far, this has not been observed. To the contrary, there is one report of a patient who received a transplant heavily contaminated by maternal cells who had no evidence of GVHD [10]. For these reasons, screening for maternal cell contamination is not included in the general practice of cord blood banking. HLA typing is done on an aliquot of cord blood. In addition, EUROCORD is collecting DNA from donors and recipients to perform molecular typing for other markers. Some banks routinely type the mother for HLA to have the information on the haplotype and to be able to control the accuracy of cord blood typing.
Because of the small volume of cord blood (40 to 150 ml), there is some concern that any attempt at cell manipulation and concentration might result in a considerable cell loss that might impair engraftment. Many banks freeze whole cord blood in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) while others use HES (hydroxyl-ethyl starch) sedimentation for volume reduction and red cell removal [6]. This last technique, if proven safe, would have the considerable advantage of reducing storage space in liquid-nitrogen freezers. Thawing techniques are well established and aim at removing red cells and DMSO [6]. Evaluation of stem cell content is a very important issue, since several studies have shown that there is a correlation between the number of nucleated cells infused and time to engraftment. There is a correlation between placental weight, time of clamping, speed of processing, volume collected, stem cell content, and the number of nucleated cells collected. Quantification of HSC in cord blood is not always easy, and most studies refer to nucleated or mononucleated cells infused per kg before or after thawing.
Cord blood can be collected for an unrelated or a related transplant, and, hypothetically, for autologous use. For use by an unrelated recipient, the woman must be aware that the donation is anonymous and free, and there is no guarantee to be able to retrieve the blood for family use [11]. Private banks have been set up, primarily in the United States, for collecting cord blood for autologous use. The widespread use of cord blood HSC has become controversial since an American company applied for a patent covering storage and use of placental blood for all human clinical uses. This company hopes to retain control of all future licensing. EUROCORD and EBMT groups are opposed to this patent on moral and legal grounds since cord blood is a gift of nature and not a human invention, and that its use, or the use of any sources of HSC that have not been modified, is beyond the realm of commercial exploitation [12]. Furthermore, the use of fetal and cord blood cells has raised ethical concerns related to the procedure of informed consent, the detection of infectious and genetic diseases, and how to inform the donor, while preserving the anonymity and freedom of both the donor and the recipient.
The results of 143 cord blood transplantations done between October 1, 1988 and December 31, 1996 in 45 EUROCORD centers and reported to the EUROCORD registry have been published [13, 14]. A database containing information about European and non-European transplant centers was reviewed. Of the 148 transplants reported during the time of the study, five were excluded because the patients had received bone marrow as well as cord blood. Seventy-eight patients received related transplants and 65 received unrelated transplants. Conditioning regimens of the transplant recipients varied according to diagnosis, previous treatment, and disease status. Patients who received cord blood from an HLA-identical sibling had conditioning regimens used in standard BMT. Total body irradiation (TBI) combined with cyclophosphamide or other chemotherapy was used in 60 patients. Busulfan was used in place of TBI in 40 patients who received a related cord blood transplant and in 24 patients who received an unrelated transplant. In the 49 patients receiving an unrelated transplant, anti-thymocyte globulin or monoclonal anti-T cell antibody was given before transplantation. Prophylaxis for GVHD consisted of cyclosporin, alone or with prednisone or methotrexate. Established GVHD was usually treated with prednisone.
The methods of cord blood collection, cryopreservation, storage, and thawing varied among the centers. Blood was usually preserved in 10% DMSO and thawed according to the method of the New York Cord Blood Bank [12]. Table 3
In patients receiving related cord blood transplants, 60 patients were transplanted with HLA-genoidentical sibling blood; and three, five, nine, and one had 1, 2, 3, and 4 HLA antigens different, respectively. In patients receiving unrelated cord blood transplants, nine had HLA-identical transplants; and 43, 11, and 2 patients had 1, 2, and 3 antigens different, respectively.
Neutrophil recovery was defined as the time to reach an absolute neutrophil count (ANC)
The median age of the patients was six years (range 0.2 to 45). The overall survival at one year was 49 ± 5% for the entire group. Recipients of related transplants had a one-year survival of 63 ± 6%, and recipients of unrelated transplants had a one-year survival of 29 ± 7% (p = 0.0001). Because the outcome was statistically significant, the two groups were analyzed separately. Variables associated with improved survival in recipients of related donor transplants included age <6 years, weight <20 kg, negative recipient CMV serology, and HLA identity. Weight and serology were most important. Variables associated with improved survival in recipients of unrelated donor transplants included negative recipient CMV serology and infusion of
In the entire group of 143 recipients, median time to reach ANC
Graft-versus-host disease Malignant relapse was seen in 22 of 95 patients on whom information was available. This included 15 of 46 recipients of related donor grafts and 7 of 49 recipients of unrelated donor grafts.
There are possible clinical advantages to using cord blood as a source of HSC for transplantation and these advantages may be related to differences between fetal and adult HSC. The relative immaturity of cord blood lymphocytes might reduce the risk and severity of GVHD, and this may permit a greater HLA disparity between donor and recipient than is usually acceptable with adult blood or marrow. This EUROCORD report suggests that cord blood may be an alternate source of HSC for use in patients with malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases. With this new source of HSC and other technical developments in HSC transplantation, we may be able to identify a donor for any given patient who needs a transplant. This new situation requires carefully planned prospective studies of the clinical efficacy of different strategies of selecting donors.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||