help button home button The Oncologist http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/subscriptions/etoc.dtl
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, L.
The Oncologist, Vol. 5, Suppl 1, 20-27, April 2000
© 2000 AlphaMed Press


SUPPLEMENT

Antiangiogenic Strategies and Agents in Clinical Trials

Lee Rosen

University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA

Correspondence: Lee Rosen, M.D., University of California Los Angeles, 10945 Le Conte Avenue, PVU Bldg., Suite 2333, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Telephone: 310-206-3170; Fax: 310-206-5414; e-mail: LSROSEN{at}mednet.ucla.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Role of Angiogenesis...
 Strategies for Blocking...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors in...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors Versus...
 References
 
The understanding that the growth of tumors depends on the acquisition of a blood supply has led to the development of new therapies for cancer and other angiogenic diseases based on inhibition of neovascularization. This review examines the role of angiogenesis in cancer progression and describes various strategies for interfering with this process. The developmental status of angiogenesis inhibitors in human clinical trials is presented, including their proposed mechanisms of action. Standard chemotherapeutic agents and angiogenesis inhibitors are compared, noting that different end points might need to be considered in clinical trials and that drug resistance may be less of a problem with antiangiogenic therapy than with conventional chemotherapy regimens. The suggestion is made that cytotoxic chemotherapy and angiogenesis inhibitors used in combination may produce complementary therapeutic benefits in the treatment of cancer.

Key Words. Angiogenesis • Angiogenesis inhibitors • Cytotoxic chemotherapy • Vascular endothelial growth factor


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Role of Angiogenesis...
 Strategies for Blocking...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors in...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors Versus...
 References
 
Angiogenesis is a process through which new blood vessels develop from preexisting vessels. This dynamic process is tightly controlled by a large number of proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors. Normal vasculature is quiescent, outside of certain physiological processes such as wound repair and the female menstrual cycle. The turnover time of these cells can be several years in duration [1]. In contrast, endothelial cells during neovascularization can proliferate with a turnover time of several days [2]. The understanding that the growth of tumors depends on angiogenesis has led to the development of novel strategies for treatment directed at tumor vasculature. Antiangiogenic compounds have had striking success in preclinical models, and new agents are rapidly entering into clinical trials. This article describes the current understanding of the principal pathways for angiogenesis and summarizes some of the types of agents available and their current clinical status. It will also address some of the difficulties in interpreting trials with drugs whose sole mechanism of action is thought to be the inhibition of angiogenesis. Finally, the possible future role these agents may play in the treatment of neoplastic disease will be discussed.


    The Role of Angiogenesis in Cancer Progression
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Role of Angiogenesis...
 Strategies for Blocking...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors in...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors Versus...
 References
 
Current research suggests that each tumor arises from a single cell that has been transformed by one or more events. Such events include the activation of oncogenes and the absence or inactivation of specific tumor-suppressor genes. These transformed cells can form small clones, initially co-opting normal host vessels, growing to only several millimeters in size before their supply of nutrients becomes limited [3-6]. At this point, the tumor may lie dormant for prolonged periods (from months to years) until ultimately undergoing destruction by the immune system or switching to an angiogenic phenotype [2]. This "switch" involves a shift in the local equilibrium between negative and positive endogenous regulators of angiogenesis [2, 7]. The tumor cells may achieve this shift in several ways, including the overexpression of angiogenic factors, the recruitment of host cells (such as macrophages) that can produce their own angiogenic factors, the mobilization of angiogenic proteins from the extracellular matrix (ECM), or a combination of these processes [2]. If the production of proangiogenic factors is sufficiently robust, neighboring endothelial cells will be activated, leading to the sprouting of new capillaries.

The creation of new blood vessels occurs by a series of steps [2, 8]. An endothelial cell forming the wall of an existing small blood vessel is activated, makes matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) enzymes that break down the ECM, invades the matrix, and then begins to proliferate. Eventually, strings of new endothelial cells organize into hollow tubes, creating new networks of blood vessels that supply a given tissue with nutrients to promote growth and repair. The amount of new blood vessel growth can correlate with poor prognosis in several tumor types [9, 10]. Since the shedding of large numbers of tumor cells from the primary tumor may not begin until after the tumor has a sufficient network of blood vessels, angiogenesis may also correlate with metastatic potential. Destruction of the ECM through MMP activation is probably necessary to initiate the metastatic process. Microvessel density has been correlated with cancer invasion and metastasis in a number of human tumors including breast [11, 12], prostate [13], lung [10], esophageal [14], colorectal [15], endometrial [9], and cervical [16]. In addition, bone marrow angiogenesis was found to be of prognostic value in patients with multiple myeloma [17] and other hematopoietic malignancies [18].

Various proteins activate endothelial cell growth and movement including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [19], acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors (aFGF and bFGF), transforming growth factors-alpha and beta, angiogenin [20], epidermal growth factor [21, 22], scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor [23, 24], placental growth factor [25], interleukin 8 [26-28], and tumor necrosis factor alpha [22, 29]. Some of the known naturally occurring inhibitors of angiogenesis include angiostatin [30], endostatin [31], interferon alfa [32], platelet factor 4 [33, 34], thrombospondin [35], transforming growth factor beta [2], 16 kD fragment of prolactin [36], and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP), including TIMP-1, TIMP-2, and TIMP-3 [37, 38].


    Strategies for Blocking Angiogenesis
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Role of Angiogenesis...
 Strategies for Blocking...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors in...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors Versus...
 References
 
Of the antiangiogenic drugs now in clinical trials, some were designed to directly target specific molecules involved in new blood vessel formation (e.g., SU5416, which inhibits VEGF-receptor signaling) while others indirectly inhibit endothelial cell function or response (e.g., inhibitors of MMP breakdown). The precise mechanism of action of some of these compounds is not known, although their antiangiogenic properties have been demonstrated in animal models or in vitro testing. Some drugs (e.g., thalidomide, as discussed below) appear to have both antiangiogenic properties and other mechanisms of action, in which case defining specific mechanisms of action in a given clinical situation may prove challenging. One strategy for interfering with the process of angiogenesis involves using agents that inhibit the proliferation or response of normal endothelial cells. Targets for this strategy include endoglin, integrins, and VEGF-receptor complexes. Another strategy involves blocking the growth factor mediated cell signaling pathways that stimulate angiogenesis using small molecule inhibitors of VEGF-receptor signaling pathways, antibodies to VEGF, dominant negative receptors that block the activity of VEGF, and agents that prevent the release or activation of FGF. The direct administration of endogenous angiogenic inhibitors such as angiostatin, endostatin, and the gene transfer of DNA that encodes for angiogenesis inhibitors, including angiostatin and platelet factor 4, are also being evaluated. Additional strategies for blocking angiogenesis involve administration of synthetic angiogenic inhibitors that specifically prevent endothelial cell division, such as synthetic derivatives of fumagillin or the inhibition of the endothelial cell mediated breakdown of the surrounding matrix. Targets for the latter strategy include enzymes that dissolve ECM and may initiate and promote angiogenesis, including interstitial collagenase (MMP-1), 72 kD gelatinase A/type IV collagenase (MMP-2), and 92 kD gelatinase B/type IV collagenase (MMP-9) [39]. Counterbalancing the effects of these enzymes are TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and possibly TIMP-4, proteins that inhibit neovascularization [39, 40]. Although TIMPs have been shown to inhibit tumor metastasis in some in vivo models [41, 42], they are not directly suitable for pharmacological applications owing to their short half-life in vivo and large molecular weight. Nevertheless, pharmacological modulation of MMPs is currently being explored in the clinic.

Although the above strategies depict the antiangiogenic activities of compounds as distinct, their mechanisms of action often overlap. For example, the angiogenesis inhibitor angiostatin may be produced from plasminogen by MMP action [43, 44], and laminin-5 is specifically degraded by MMP-2 to produce a soluble chemotactic fragment [44, 45]. This suggests that angiostatin may be producing effects through direct inhibition of the endothelial cell as well as by interaction with mechanisms of tissue breakdown. In another case, thalidomide has been shown to inhibit angiogenesis, possibly through its modulation of integrins [46, 47], but it may act by directly binding DNA [48], stimulating T cell responses [49], and upregulating tumor antigens [50], among its other effects. Similarly, TNP-740, a fumagillin derivative in clinical trials, not only interferes with endothelial cell proliferation by inhibiting Ets-1 transcription factor expression [51] but also demonstrates immunosuppressive effects via inhibition of methionine aminopeptidase 2 [52] and acts as an inhibitor of membrane translocation of bioproteins [53].

Many commonly used oncological agents can modulate angiogenesis as a secondary mechanism of action. For example, the camptothecin analogs, 9-amino-20(S)-camptothecin, topotecan, and CPT-11, are inhibitors of topoisomerase I and have also been shown to decrease tumor-associated angiogenesis [54]. Paclitaxel, a microtubule inhibitor that is an active agent in the treatment of many different cancers, was shown to possess antiangiogenic properties independent of its antiproliferative action in in vivo models [55, 56]. Thus, in many cases, multiple activities ascribed to individual agents confound our ability to determine precisely the contribution of angiogenesis inhibition to an agent's efficacy.


    Angiogenesis Inhibitors in Clinical Trials
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Role of Angiogenesis...
 Strategies for Blocking...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors in...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors Versus...
 References
 
Agents that Inhibit Endothelial Cells
Several endogenous angiogenesis inhibitors or agents that directly inhibit endothelial cell proliferation are undergoing phase I/II clinical evaluation, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy (Table 1Go). These compounds are usually of low molecular weight, except for endostatin, which is a 20 kD C-terminal fragment of collagen XVIII. Phase II clinical trials in several tumor types are under way with thalidomide, despite its withdrawal from sale in 1961 after being held responsible for the birth of hundreds of phocomelus children. A recent phase II study of thalidomide has demonstrated its antitumor activity in patients with refractory multiple myeloma [57]. Although these compounds all directly inhibit endothelial cells, their molecular targets on endothelial cells are diverse. In particular, combretastatin is unique since it induces apoptosis in proliferating endothelial cells, leading to blood flow shutdown to tumors rather than to surrounding normal tissues.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Endogenous inhibitors and drugs that directly inhibit endothelial cells
 
Agents that Block Activators of Angiogenesis
Targeting VEGF directly interferes with the angiogenic process and thus allows for therapy specificity, unlike many of the other mechanisms of the antiangiogenic drugs currently under study. Ongoing clinical trials of agents that block the VEGF pathway are shown in Table 2Go. VEGF, an endothelial cell-specific mitogen normally produced during embryogenesis and adult life, is a significant mediator of angiogenesis in a variety of normal and pathological processes including tumor development. Eppenberger et al. reported that tumor VEGF level was the most important prognostic parameter among several markers of tumor angiogenesis [58]. SU5416, a small molecule inhibitor of the VEGF receptor Flk-1/KDR, is currently under clinical evaluation. To date, 69 patients have been enrolled in the first phase I clinical trial with SU5416; the drug has been found to be well tolerated, with stable disease observed in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), non-small cell lung, colorectal, renal cell, and basal cell cancers [59]. Although the mechanism of action is cytostatic in nature, partial responses have been observed with SU5416. Recently, SU5416 has been shown to induce endothelial and tumor cell apoptosis in a xenograft model of colon cancer liver metastasis [60]. The ability of SU5416 to induce apoptosis in cancer cells that lack adequate vasculature may have contributed to the partial responses observed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Drugs that block activators of angiogenesis
 
Interferon alfa has been commercially available for almost 15 years and has demonstrated an ~30% response rate in patients with AIDS-related KS with good prognostic factors [61-63]. It has also been found to be active in the treatment of hemangiomas [64], chronic myeloid leukemias [65], myelomas [66], melanomas [67], lymphomas [68, 69], and renal cell carcinomas [70].

Agents that Block Extracellular Matrix Breakdown
Ongoing clinical trials of seven MMP inhibitors are shown in Table 3Go. Marimastat has been well tolerated in phase I studies in healthy volunteers who received short courses of treatment [71]. The symptoms of severe joint pain and muscle pain reported by many patients were reversible after discontinuation of the drug. A pooled analysis of six studies in colorectal, ovarian, and prostate cancer has demonstrated a dose-dependent biological effect. A total of 58% of patients responded at doses >50 mg twice a day. Potential clinical activity in pancreatic and gastric cancer has also been demonstrated in small phase II studies. These studies have demonstrated that cytotoxic chemotherapy can be safely combined with marimastat, and hence ongoing phase III studies are further investigating the utility of combination therapy with marimastat and cytotoxic therapy in the treatment of small cell lung cancer and pancreatic and gastric carcinoma [71]. A 15-patient, phase I pharmacokinetic study of AG3340 in combination with mitoxantrone and prednisone in patients with advanced prostate cancer has reported that the combination is well tolerated [72]. A phase I study has also reported the combination of AG3340, paclitaxel, and carboplatin as safe and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors [73]. Several phase III trials with this agent are ongoing, and results will be reported shortly. Bay 12-9566 has undergone phase I testing as a single agent [74] and is currently undergoing further testing in combination with standard doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin [75]. MMI270 has completed single-agent phase I studies, and its administration with concomitant folinic acid is currently being explored [76].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Drugs that block matrix breakdown
 
Additional updated information on antiangiogenesis agents in clinical trials can be obtained through individual sponsors as well as on the National Cancer Institute Cancer Trial website, http://cancertrials.nci.nih.gov


    Angiogenesis Inhibitors Versus Standard Chemotherapy
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Role of Angiogenesis...
 Strategies for Blocking...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors in...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors Versus...
 References
 
Unlike standard chemotherapy that targets tumor cells and other proliferating cells, angiogenesis inhibitors target dividing endothelial cells. Thus, antiangiogenic agents are not as likely to cause toxicities such as gastrointestinal symptoms and myelosuppression that are characteristic of standard chemotherapeutic regimens. In addition, drug resistance can be a major problem with chemotherapy agents since most cancer cells are genetically unstable and are therefore prone to mutations. In contrast, cancer cells are less likely to develop resistance to antiangiogenic agents since these agents target normal endothelial cells, which are more genetically stable. As demonstrated by preclinical and early clinical data, drug resistance has not been a major concern with angiogenesis inhibitors. Further, since normal vasculature in the adult is quiescent, the appropriate use of selective inhibitors of angiogenesis may be expected to confer a degree of specificity that is not obtainable with the nonspecific modalities of chemotherapy and radiation therapy and to allow for relatively nontoxic, long-term treatment of tumors.

Because antiangiogenic agents are expected to be cytostatic rather than cytotoxic, the proper end points of early clinical trials may have to differ from those of standard chemotherapy agents. For antiangiogenesis therapy, improved survival or increased time-to-disease progression (see the article "Clinical Strategy for the Development of Angiogenesis Inhibitors" in this volume) may be a more appropriate end point than evaluating objective response alone. In addition, issues related to treating children and women of childbearing potential—groups with ongoing physiological angiogenesis—would have to be considered. Lastly, the use of antiangiogenesis therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy are not mutually exclusive. Since the two therapeutic strategies are directed at different cellular targets, antiangiogenesis therapy may prove useful in combination with standard chemotherapy directed at tumor cells. As noted in this review, such trials are currently under way.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Role of Angiogenesis...
 Strategies for Blocking...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors in...
 Angiogenesis Inhibitors Versus...
 References
 

  1. Denekamp J. Review article: angiogenesis, neovascular proliferation and vascular pathophysiology as targets for cancer therapy. Br J Radiol 1993;66:181-196.[Abstract]
  2. Folkman J. Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston. Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1757-1763.[Free Full Text]
  3. Folkman J, Cole P, Zimmerman S. Tumor behavior in isolated perfused organs: in vitro growth and metastases of biopsy material in rabbit thyroid and canine intestinal segment. Ann Surg 1966;164:491-502.[Medline]
  4. Gimbrone MA Jr, Leapman SB, Cotran RS et al. Tumor dormancy in vivo by prevention of neovascularization. J Exp Med 1972;136:261-276.[Abstract]
  5. Gimbrone MA Jr, Cotran RS, Leapman SB et al. Tumor growth and neovascularization: an experimental model using the rabbit cornea. J Natl Cancer Inst 1974;52:413-427.
  6. Folkman J. What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:4-6.[Free Full Text]
  7. Dameron KM, Volpert OV, Tainsky MA et al. Control of angiogenesis in fibroblasts by p53 regulation of thrombospondin-1. Science 1994;265:1582-1584.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Cockerill GW, Gamble JR, Vadas MA. Angiogenesis: models and modulators. Int Rev Cytol 1995;159:113-160.[Medline]
  9. Giatromanolaki A, Sivridis E, Koukourakis MI et al. Intratumoral angiogenesis: a new prognostic indicator for stage I endometrial adenocarcinomas? Oncol Res 1999;11:205-212.[Medline]
  10. Dazzi C, Cariello A, Maioli P et al. Prognostic and predictive value of intratumoral microvessels density in operable non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 1999;24:81-88.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Toi M, Kashitani J, Tominaga T. Tumor angiogenesis is an independent prognostic indicator in primary breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1993;55:371-374.[Medline]
  12. Toi M, Inada K, Suzuki H et al. Tumor angiogenesis in breast cancer: its importance as a prognostic indicator and the association with vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1995;36:193-204.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Strohmeyer D, Rossing C, Strauss F et al. Tumor angiogenesis is associated with progression after radical prostatectomy in pT2/pT3 prostate cancer. Prostate 2000;42:26-33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Patel T, Roychowdhury DF, Chadalavada R. Angiogenesis in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;18:614a.
  15. Fruehauf JP, Naab T, Mehta R et al. Prognostic value of angiogenesis index in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;18:284a.
  16. Ahn CS, Kang JY, Rho JS et al. Angiogenesis in squamous epithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. J Clin Oncol 1997;16:552a.
  17. Rajkumar SV, Leong T, Fonseca R et al. Bone marrow angiogenesis has prognostic value in multiple myeloma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 1999;18:19a.
  18. Bellamy WT, Richter L, Frutiger Y et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in hematopoietic malignancies. Cancer Res 1999;59:728-733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ferrara N, Henzel WJ. Pituitary follicular cells secrete a novel heparin-binding growth factor specific for vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1989;161:851-858.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Folkman J, Klagsbrun M. Angiogenic factors. Science 1987;235:442-447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. McAuslan BR, Bender V, Reilly W et al. New functions of epidermal growth factor: stimulation of capillary endothelial cell migration and matrix dependent proliferation. Cell Biol Int Rep 1985;9:175-182.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Ferrara N, Houck K, Jakeman L et al. Molecular and biological properties of the vascular endothelial growth factor family of proteins. Endocr Rev 1992;13:18-32.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Rosen EM, Grant DS, Kleinman HK et al. Scatter factor (hepatocyte growth factor) is a potent angiogenesis factor in vivo. Symp Soc Exp Biol 1993;47:227-234.[Medline]
  24. Rosen EM, Laterra J, Joseph A et al. Scatter factor expression and regulation in human glial tumors. Int J Cancer 1996;67:248-255.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Relf M, LeJeune S, Scott PAE et al. Expression of the angiogenic factors vascular endothelial cell growth factor, acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor, tumor growth factor beta-1, platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, placenta growth factor, and pleiotrophin in human primary breast cancer and its relation to angiogenesis. Cancer Res 1997;57:963-969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Koch AE, Polverini PJ, Kunkel SL et al. Interleukin-8 as a macrophage-derived mediator of angiogenesis. Science 1992;258:1798-1801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Smith DR, Polverini PJ, Kunkel SL et al. Inhibition of interleukin 8 attenuates angiogenesis in bronchogenic carcinoma. J Exp Med 1994;179:1409-1415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Gawrychowski K, Skopinska-Rózewska E, Barcz E et al. Angiogenic activity and interleukin-8 content of human ovarian cancer ascites. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1998;19:262-264.[Medline]
  29. Frater-Schroder M, Risau W, Hallmann R et al. Tumor necrosis factor type alpha, a potent inhibitor of endothelial cell growth in vitro, is angiogenic in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:5277-5281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. O'Reilly MS, Holmgren L, Shing Y et al. Angiostatin: a novel angiogenesis inhibitor that mediates the suppression of metastases by a Lewis lung carcinoma. Cell 1994;79:315-328.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. O'Reilly MS, Boehm T, Shing Y et al. Endostatin: an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Cell 1997;88:277-285.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Dinney CP, Bielenberg DR, Perrotte P et al. Inhibition of basic fibroblast growth factor expression, angiogenesis, and growth of human bladder carcinoma in mice by systemic interferon-alpha administration. Cancer Res 1998;58:808-814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sharpe RJ, Byers HR, Scott CF et al. Growth inhibition of murine melanoma and human colon carcinoma by recombinant human platelet factor 4. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:848-853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Maione TE, Gray GS, Petro J et al. Inhibition of angiogenesis by recombinant human platelet factor-4 and related peptides. Science 1990;247:77-79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Tolsma SS, Volpert OV, Good DJ et al. Peptides derived from two separate domains of the matrix protein thrombospondin-1 have anti-angiogenic activity. J Cell Biol 1993;122:497-511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Clapp C, Martial JA, Guzman RC et al. The 16-kilodalton N-terminal fragment of human prolactin is a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis. Endocrinology 1993;133:1292-1299.[Abstract]
  37. Henriet P, Blavier L, Declerck YA. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP) in invasion and proliferation. APMIS 1999;107:111-119.[Medline]
  38. Johnson MD, Kim HR, Chesler L et al. Inhibition of angiogenesis by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase. J Cell Physiol 1994;160:194-202.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Sang QX. Complex role of matrix metalloproteinases in angiogenesis. Cell Res 1998;8:171-177.[Medline]
  40. Gomez DE, Alonso DF, Yoshiji H et al. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: structure, regulation and biological functions. Eur J Cell Biol 1997;74:111-122.[Medline]
  41. Khokha R. Suppression of the tumorigenic and metastatic abilities of murine B16-F10 melanoma cells in vivo by the overexpression of the tissue inhibitor of the metalloproteinases-1. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:299-304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Kruger A, Sanchez-Sweatman OH, Martin DC et al. Host TIMP-1 overexpression confers resistance to experimental brain metastasis of a fibrosarcoma cell line. Oncogene 1998;16:2419-2423.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Cornelius LA, Nehring LC, Harding E et al. Matrix metalloproteinases generate angiostatin: effects on neovascularization. J Immunol 1998;161:6845-6852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Kleiner DE, Stetler-Stevenson WG. Matrix metalloproteinases and metastasis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1999;43(suppl):S42-S51.
  45. Giannelli G, Brassard J, Foti C et al. Altered expression of basement membrane proteins and their integrin receptors in lichen planus: possible pathogenetic role of gelatinases A and B. Lab Invest 1996;74:1091-1104.[Medline]
  46. Neubert R, Nogueira AC, Neubert D. Thalidomide derivatives and the immune system. I. Changes in the pattern of integrin receptors and other surface markers on T lymphocyte subpopulations of marmoset blood. Arch Toxicol 1993;67:1-17.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. McCarty MF. Thalidomide may impede cell migration in primates by down-regulating integrin beta-chains: potential therapeutic utility in solid malignancies, proliferative retinopathy, inflammatory disorders, neointimal hyperplasia, and osteoporosis. Med Hypotheses 1997;49:123-131.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Huang PH, McBride WG, Tuman WG. Interaction of thalidomide with DNA of rabbit embryos: a possible explanation for its immunosuppressant and teratogenic effects. Pharmacol Toxicol 1999;85:103-104.[Medline]
  49. Haslett PA, Klausner JD, Makonkawkeyoon S et al. Thalidomide stimulates T cell responses and interleukin 12 production in HIV-infected patients. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 1999;15:1169-1179.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Dixon SC, Kruger EA, Bauer KS et al. Thalidomide up-regulates prostate-specific antigen secretion from LNCaP cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1999;43(suppl):S78-S84.
  51. Wernert N, Stanjek A, Kiriakidis S et al. Inhibition of angiogenesis in vivo by ets-1 antisense oligonucleotides-inhibition of Ets-1 transcription factor expression by the antibiotic fumagillin. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 1999;38:3228-3231.[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Turk BE, Su Z, Liu JO. Synthetic analogues of TNP-470 and ovalicin reveal a common molecular basis for inhibition of angiogenesis and immunosuppression. Bioorg Med Chem 1998;6:1163-1169.[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Yoshida T, Kaneko Y, Tsukamoto A et al. Suppression of hepatoma growth and angiogenesis by a fumagillin derivative TNP470: possible involvement of nitric oxide synthase. Cancer Res 1998;58:3751-3756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. O'Leary JJ, Shapiro RL, Ren CJ et al. Anti-angiogenic effects of 9-amino-20(S)-camptothecin (9-AC), topotecan (TTN), and CPT-11 studied in the mouse cornea model. J Clin Oncol 1998;17:248a.
  55. Klauber N, Parangi S, Flynn E et al. Inhibition of angiogenesis and breast cancer in mice by the microtubule inhibitors 2-methoxyestradiol and taxol. Cancer Res 1997;57:81-86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Belotti D, Vergani V, Drudis T et al. The microtubule-affecting drug paclitaxel has antiangiogenic activity. Clin Cancer Res 1996;2:1843-1849.[Abstract]
  57. Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1565-1571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Eppenberger U, Kueng W, Schlaeppi J-M et al. Markers of tumor angiogenesis and proteolysis independently define high- and low-risk subsets of node-negative breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:3129-3136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Rosen L, Mulay M, Mayers A et al. Phase I dose-escalating trial of SU5416, a novel angiogenesis inhibitor in patients with advanced malignancies. J Clin Oncol 1999;18:161a.
  60. Shaheen RM, Davis DW, Liu W et al. Antiangiogenic therapy targeting the tyrosine kinase receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibits the growth of colon cancer liver metastasis and induces tumor and endothelial cell apoptosis. Cancer Res 1999;59:5412-5416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Evans LM, Itri LM, Campion M et al. Interferon-alpha 2a in the treatment of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related Kaposi's sarcoma. J Immunother 1991;10:39-50.
  62. Fischl MA, Finkelstein DM, He W et al. A phase II study of recombinant human interferon-alpha 2a and zidovudine in patients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. AIDS Clinical Trials Group. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1996;11:379-384.[Medline]
  63. Morris AK, Valley AW. Overview of the management of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. Ann Pharmacother 1996;30:1150-1163.[Abstract]
  64. Tryfonas GI, Tsikopoulos G, Liasidou E et al. Conservative treatment of hemangiomas in infancy and childhood with interferon-alpha 2a. Pediatr Surg Int 1998;13:590-593.[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. Hehlmann R, Heimpel H, Hasford J et al. Randomized comparison of interferon-alpha with busulfan and hydroxyurea in chronic myelogenous leukemia. The German CML Study Group. Blood 1994;84:4064-4077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Mellstedt H, Osterborg A, Bjorkholm M et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma with interferon alpha: the Scandinavian experience. Br J Haematol 1991;79(suppl 1):21-25.
  67. Mughal TI, Thomas MR, Robinson WA. Role of recombinant alpha-interferon in the treatment of advanced cutaneous malignant melanoma. Oncology 1991;48:365-368.[Medline]
  68. Price CG, Rohatiner AZ, Steward W et al. Interferon-alpha 2b in the treatment of follicular lymphoma: preliminary results of a trial in progress. Ann Oncol 1991;2(suppl 2):141-145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Dreno B, Claudy A, Meynadier J et al. The treatment of 45 patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with low doses of interferon-alpha 2a and etretinate. Br J Dermatol 1991;125:456-459.[CrossRef][Medline]
  70. Hernberg M, Pyrhonen S, Muhonen T. Regimens with or without interferon-alpha as treatment for metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma: an overview of randomized trials. J Immunother 1999;22:145-154.
  71. Steward WP. Marimastat (BB2516): current status of development. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1999;43(suppl):S56-S60.
  72. Wilding G, Small E, Collier M et al. A phase I pharmacokinetic evaluation of the matrix metalloprotease (MMP) inhibitor AG3340 in combination with mitoxantrone and prednisone in patients with advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;18:323a.
  73. D'Olimpio J, Hande K, Collier M et al. Phase I study of the matrix metalloprotease inhibitor AG3340 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 1999;18:160a.
  74. Goel R, Hirte H, Major P et al. Clinical pharmacology of the metalloproteinase (MMP) and angiogenesis inhibitor Bayer 12-9566 in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1999;18:160a.
  75. Tolcher A, Rowinsky EK, Rizzo J et al. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin. J Clin Oncol 1999;18:160a.
  76. Eatock M, Cassidy J, Johnson J et al. A phase I study of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor MM1270 (previously termed CGS270231) with 5FU and folinic acid. J Clin Oncol 1999;18:209a.
accepted for publication February 14, 2000.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, L.


HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS
http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/misc/eLetters.shtml