| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
Correspondence: Napoleone Ferrara, M.D., Genentech, Inc., One DNA Way, South San Francisco, California 94080, USA. Telephone: 650-225-2968; Fax: 650-225-6443; e-mail: nf{at}gene.com
Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit atCME.TheOncologist.com
![]()
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Top
Learning Objectives
Abstract
Introduction
Angiogenesis and Its Role...
VEGF in Normal and...
Significance of VEGF in...
Targeting VEGF: Implications for...
Conclusions
References
After completing this course, the reader will be able to:
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words. Vascular endothelial growth factor • Angiogenesis • Cancer • Monoclonal antibody • Bevacizumab
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strategies targeting tumor angiogenesis have been a focus of intense research over the past decade, following observations that the growth and metastatic spread of tumors are dependent on their development of a vascular supply [1, 2]. This research effort has led to the isolation of an array of factors that mediate both positive and negative regulation of angiogenesis, with the most pivotal positive regulator being vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [3, 4]. This review examines the central role that VEGF plays in angiogenesis, both in the normal physiological setting as well as in the context of cancer, with a particular focus on the application of current concepts to the development of new anticancer therapies.
| ANGIOGENESIS AND ITS ROLE IN TUMOR GROWTH |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During embryogenesis, the formation of the cardiovascular system proceeds through an initial stage termed vasculogenesis, in which the endothelial cells differentiate from mesodermal precursors, followed by angiogenesis, the elaboration of the tubular network of endothelial cells. This process requires a series of steps, including endothelial cell activation, basement membrane degradation, cell migration, extracellular matrix invasion, endothelial cell proliferation, and capillary lumen formation. Subsequent stabilization of the vascular network involves the reversal of these processes, with the reestablishment of the basement membrane, cessation of cell proliferation, junctional complex formation, and recruitment of pericytes to support the vessel wall.
Angiogenesis continues throughout development, with new capillaries forming by sprouting or splitting from preformed vessels, followed by remodeling, as the organism grows to final form. In the adult, physiological angiogenesis continues, albeit at a much reduced level, and is associated primarily with maintenance of the vasculature, and with wound healing and menstrual cycling [3, 58].
Angiogenesis is essential for the growth of most primary tumors and their subsequent metastasis (Fig. 1
). Tumors can absorb sufficient nutrients and oxygen by simple diffusion up to a size of 12 mm, at which point their further growth requires the elaboration of a vascular supply. This process is thought to involve recruitment of the neighboring host mature vasculature to begin sprouting new blood vessel capillaries, which grow toward, and subsequently infiltrate, the tumor mass [9]. In addition, both physiological and tumor angiogenesis involve the recruitment of circulating endothelial precursor cells from the bone marrow to promote neovascularization [10, 11].
|
Both physiologic and tumor angiogenesis are regulated by a host of growth factors in the microenvironment (Table 1
), some of which, such as VEGF, are highly specific for endothelial cells, while others, such as basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), have a much broader range of action. Activating factors can be produced by the tumors themselves, by the surrounding tissue, or by infiltrating macrophages and fibroblasts [8]. The majority of the activating compounds exert their actions through endothelial cell surface receptors, for which they serve as ligands, ultimately leading to secretion of additional angiogenic factors. In addition, hypoxia, hypoglycemia, and mechanical stress can serve as stimuli [8]. In the case of the matrix metalloproteinases, the stimulation is thought to reflect the proteolysis of basement membrane constituents, such as heparan sulfate proteoglycans, and the consequent release of sequestered growth factors [13].
|
|
| VEGF IN NORMAL AND TUMOR ANGIOGENESIS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
VEGF actions are mediated through binding to two receptor tyrosine kinases, VEGFR-1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (KDR; whose murine form is known as Flk-1). Activation of these receptors by VEGF triggers the phosphorylation of a multitude of proteins that are active in signal transduction cascades [3]. Other members of the VEGF family show different receptor-binding specificities, with VEGF-B and placental growth factor (PIGF) binding and activating only VEGFR-1. VEGF-C and VEGF-D bind a third receptor, VEGFR-3 (Flt-4), through which they mediate lymphangiogenesis [22, 23], and also show some activity toward VEGFR-2. Both VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 are found predominantly on the surfaces of vascular endothelial cells, where they bind VEGF with high affinity. Although VEGFR-1 binds with higher affinity, it is believed to act primarily as a decoy receptor, modulating the availability of VEGF to VEGFR-2, the principal receptor for VEGF signaling [3, 24]. Further modulatory actions are exerted by a soluble form of VEGFR-1, which binds VEGF and can inhibit VEGF-induced mitogenesis, as well as the neuropilins, receptors for the collapsin/semaphorin family. Neuropilin-2 binds to VEGFR-1, while neuropilin-1 binds to VEGF-165 and increases its affinity for VEGFR-2 by approximately one order of magnitude [25].
VEGF gene expression is upregulated by a host of stimuli, including estrogen, nitric oxide (NO), and a variety of growth factors, such as fibroblast growth factor-4, PDGF, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
), epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-ß), keratinocyte growth factor, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1ß, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) (Fig. 3
) [3, 25, 26]. Consistent with its role in tumor angiogenesis, expression of VEGF is upregulated by the common genetic events leading to malignant transformation, including loss of tumor suppressor genes, such as p53, and activation of oncogenes, such as ras, v-src, and HER2 [15]. Moreover, VEGF expression is particularly sensitive to oxygen tension and is rapidly upregulated by the hypoxia that characterizes most tumors, which is due to the aberrant nature of their vascular supply [27]. Shweiki et al. noted that, in glioblastoma multiforme tumors, the maximal expression of VEGF mRNA was found in necrotic (and presumably hypoxic) regions [28].
|
has been variously reported to have positive and negative effects on expression of VEGFR-2 [3].
Actions of VEGF in Angiogenesis
VEGF is a growth factor that is essential for the regulation of both physiological and pathological angiogenesis. It also plays a pivotal role in embryonic vasculogenesis, to the extent that deleting only one allele results in death of the embryo [29]. As described above, angiogenesis is a multistep process, and VEGF acts at several stages (Fig. 4
):
|
Other actions of VEGF include increasing vascular permeability [38], inhibition of dendritic cell differentiation [39], upregulation of hexose transport into endothelial cells [40], induction of tissue factor [41], and induction of monocyte migration [42].
Owing to the amount of VEGF that tumors produce, a positive feedback loop is created, wherein VEGF-induced promotion of angiogenesis allows for enhanced tumor growth, which in turn results in increased VEGF secretion. This type of amplification can be further enhanced through the VEGF-mediated upregulation of expression of the VEGF receptors in endothelial cells [43]. In addition, tumor angiogenesis recruits bone-marrow-derived endothelial precursor cells, a process that is also dependent on VEGF and that can be completely ablated if signaling through both VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 is inhibited [11].
| SIGNIFICANCE OF VEGF IN CANCER |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several factors combine to contribute to more serious disease in instances of elevated VEGF expression. First, the role of VEGF in promoting the development of tumor vasculature supports this essential component of tumor development. Moreover, many tumors express VEGF receptors, so that VEGF can act as a paracrine factor, leading to a feedback loop not only through the stimulation of vascularization, but also through direct action on the tumor cells themselves. In this context, it can both promote the growth of transformed cell lines in vitro [48] and act as a survival factor for cancer cells through enhanced expression of the antiapoptotic factors Bcl-2 [49] and survivin [50]. VEGF-mediated inhibition of dendritic cell differentiation [39] may underlie the deficit of dendritic-cell infiltration that has been observed in gastric carcinoma tissues, suggesting that VEGF causes reduced immune surveillance of tumors [51]. Perhaps most importantly, the report that VEGF is essential for vascularization at very early stages of tumor formation by transformed cells implies that this growth factor is a key promoter of metastasis [51].
Thus, it is not surprising that VEGF expression in the primary tumor has been correlated in many studies with a greater risk for recurrence and poor prognosis in a variety of human cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia, breast cancer, colon cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and ovarian cancer [8]. High VEGF levels have been found in malignant effusions, and it is thought that the permeability-enhancing effects of VEGF may promote effusion [24]. Elevated VEGF levels may also contribute to increased resistance to chemotherapy or endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer [52]. Accordingly, VEGF status has proved to be of value in predicting the effectiveness of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy, as well as the likelihood of relapse, in a variety of cancers [24, 47].
| TARGETING VEGF: IMPLICATIONS FOR THERAPY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Given its central role in promoting many cancers, VEGF provides an attractive target for therapeutic intervention. Two considerations in particular deserve emphasis: VEGF has a strategic position in the regulation of tumor angiogenesis, as it serves as a point of integration of a variety of upstream and downstream signals (Fig. 3
), leading ultimately to stimulation of the endothelial cell; and VEGF promotes angiogenesis by acting directly on the endothelial cell, a genetically stable entity, rather than on genetically labile tumor cells. Accordingly, it has been suggested that, in contrast to drugs that inhibit angiogenesis indirectly through the inhibition of tumor-derived angiogenic factors, drugs that act to inhibit VEGF signaling may be less susceptible to selection of mutations that confer resistance [18]. However, recent evidence suggests that tumors can become resistant to antiangiogenic drugs, possibly through genetic mutations and instabilities associated with tumor cells [54, 55].
It is difficult for conventional therapies to gain adequate access to tumor tissue, first, because of the aberrant vasculaturehighly tortuous with many blind endsthat characterizes most tumors [56], and second, because drug penetration into tumor tissue is diminished because interstitial pressure is elevated in most tumors, owing to severe leakage from the vasculature [57]. This latter effect is probably attributable to the actions of VEGF in enhancing vascular permeability. These factors are compounded by the secondary effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, which lead to local regions of hypoxia and induction of VEGF expression. The overproduction of VEGF not only exacerbates the high tumor interstitial pressure, but also protects tumor cells against the apoptosis that is normally induced by conventional therapies [49]. In principle, angiogenesis inhibitors, by targeting the vasculature rather than the tumor cells, should be able to circumvent the problem posed by high interstitial pressures in the tumors, since they do not require access to the tumor tissue.
Perhaps the most dramatic observation from recent studies has been the finding that coadministration of angiogenesis inhibitors with chemotherapy and radiotherapy can enhance the efficacy of these standard treatments. While it might be expected that drugs that target the tumor blood supply would exacerbate these difficulties, making the tumor cells even less accessible as the vasculature retracts, the reverse has been found in practice. Teicher et al. found that coadministration of the angiogenesis inhibitor TNR-470, a fumagillin analog, both enhanced both the permeability of murine tumors and led to a dramatic increase in cyclophosphamide-induced tumor cell killing [58]. Jain argued that this reflects a normalization of the tumor vasculature by angiogenesis inhibitors, so that some of the aberrant tumor blood vessels are pruned away as a result of endothelial cell death [56].
Moreover, many chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens induce VEGF expression, which may contribute to tumor resistance to apoptosis-inducing modalities. Inhibition of VEGF or its receptors potentiates radiation-mediated killing of cancer cells, presumably by inhibiting the radiation-induced increase in VEGF and subsequent hypoxia [59, 60]. Indeed, an anti-VEGF antibody augmented the tumor response under normoxic and hypoxic conditions [59].
A variety of therapeutic strategies aimed at blocking VEGF or its receptor signaling system are currently being developed for the treatment of neoplastic diseases. VEGF/VEGFR blockade by monoclonal antibodies and inhibition of receptor signaling by tyrosine kinase inhibitors are the best studied approaches. VEGFR-1 ribozymes, VEGF toxin conjugates, and soluble VEGF receptors are also being investigated. Of these, bevacizumab (rhuMAb VEGF; AvastinTM; Genentech, Inc.; South San Francisco, CA), a humanized monoclonal antibody directed at VEGF, is the most advanced in clinical development and has shown promising results in clinical trials.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key advantages of targeting VEGF include: by targeting the endothelial cell, rather than the tumor itself, issues of accessibility to the tumor interior are avoided and drug resistance may be less likely; given the central role of VEGF in both tumor growth and the establishment of metastases, its inhibition should prove effective at all stages of cancer, with the prevention of metastasis being a particular benefit; coadministration of therapies against VEGF with chemotherapy or radiotherapy is likely to lead to greater efficacies of these traditional therapies by preventing VEGF-mediated potentiation of cell survival, and given that targeting angiogenesis avoids the nonspecific toxicities associated with chemotherapy, there is ample scope for empirical combination, both with other antiangiogenesis therapies and with traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, to provide maximal flexibility in tailoring treatment options for the individual patient.
Most recently, this modality has received validation in a large, phase III clinical trial in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy resulted in a highly significant longer time to progression and greater survival than chemotherapy alone [61].
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. C. Milsom, J. L. Yu, N. Mackman, J. Micallef, G. M. Anderson, A. Guha, and J. W. Rak Tissue Factor Regulation by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transitions: Effect on Tumor Initiation and Angiogenesis Cancer Res., December 15, 2008; 68(24): 10068 - 10076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Aleku, P. Schulz, O. Keil, A. Santel, U. Schaeper, B. Dieckhoff, O. Janke, J. Endruschat, B. Durieux, N. Roder, et al. Atu027, a Liposomal Small Interfering RNA Formulation Targeting Protein Kinase N3, Inhibits Cancer Progression Cancer Res., December 1, 2008; 68(23): 9788 - 9798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Bradshaw-Pierce, C. A. Steinhauer, D. Raben, and D. L. Gustafson Pharmacokinetic-directed dosing of vandetanib and docetaxel in a mouse model of human squamous cell carcinoma Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2008; 7(9): 3006 - 3017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Heckman, T. Holopainen, M. Wirzenius, S. Keskitalo, M. Jeltsch, S. Yla-Herttuala, S. R. Wedge, J. M. Jurgensmeier, and K. Alitalo The Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Cediranib Blocks Ligand-Induced Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 Activity and Lymphangiogenesis Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 68(12): 4754 - 4762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Strome, E. A. Sausville, and D. Mann A Mechanistic Perspective of Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer Therapy Beyond Target-Related Effects Oncologist, September 1, 2007; 12(9): 1084 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zhou, M. F. Bolontrade, K. Reddy, X. Duan, H. Guan, L. Yu, D. J. Hicklin, and E. S. Kleinerman Suppression of Ewing's Sarcoma Tumor Growth, Tumor Vessel Formation, and Vasculogenesis Following Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 13(16): 4867 - 4873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Riely and V. A. Miller Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Trap in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 13(15): 4623s - 4627s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pisati, M. Belicchi, F. Acerbi, C. Marchesi, C. Giussani, M. Gavina, S. Javerzat, M. Hagedorn, G. Carrabba, V. Lucini, et al. Effect of Human Skin-Derived Stem Cells on Vessel Architecture, Tumor Growth, and Tumor Invasion in Brain Tumor Animal Models Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3054 - 3063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Giaccone The Potential of Antiangiogenic Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 13(7): 1961 - 1970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Senan and E. F. Smit Design of Clinical Trials of Radiation Combined with Antiangiogenic Therapy Oncologist, April 1, 2007; 12(4): 465 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Bozulic, P. J. Morin, T. Hunter, and B. A. Hemmings Meeting Report: Targeting the Kinome--20 Years of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Research in Basel Sci. Signal., February 20, 2007; 2007(374): pe8 - pe8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. I. Rini Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Directions Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 13(4): 1098 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Chen, J. Lin, T. Kanekura, J. Su, W. Lin, H. Xie, Y. Wu, J. Li, M. Chen, and J. Chang A Small Interfering CD147-Targeting RNA Inhibited the Proliferation, Invasiveness, and Metastatic Activity of Malignant Melanoma Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 66(23): 11323 - 11330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kim, S. Suvas, P. P. Sarangi, S. Lee, R. A. Reisfeld, and B. T. Rouse Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2-Based DNA Immunization Delays Development of Herpetic Stromal Keratitis by Antiangiogenic Effects J. Immunol., September 15, 2006; 177(6): 4122 - 4131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S M Hyder Sex-steroid regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in breast cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2006; 13(3): 667 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Milano and O Guerin Recent advances in targeted therapies for colorectal cancer Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2006; 12(2): 69 - 73. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jeltsch, T. Karpanen, T. Strandin, K. Aho, H. Lankinen, and K. Alitalo Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)/VEGF-C Mosaic Molecules Reveal Specificity Determinants and Feature Novel Receptor Binding Patterns J. Biol. Chem., April 28, 2006; 281(17): 12187 - 12195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tzukerman, T. Rosenberg, I. Reiter, S. Ben-Eliezer, G. Denkberg, R. Coleman, Y. Reiter, and K. Skorecki The influence of a human embryonic stem cell-derived microenvironment on targeting of human solid tumor xenografts. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 66(7): 3792 - 3801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Malik, M. E. Baldwin, F. Peale, G. Fuh, W.-C. Liang, H. Lowman, G. Meng, N. Ferrara, and H.-P. Gerber Redundant roles of VEGF-B and PlGF during selective VEGF-A blockade in mice Blood, January 15, 2006; 107(2): 550 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Van Schaeybroeck, A. Karaiskou-McCaul, D. Kelly, D. Longley, L. Galligan, E. Van Cutsem, and P. Johnston Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activity Determines Response of Colorectal Cancer Cells to Gefitinib Alone and in Combination with Chemotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 11(20): 7480 - 7489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yamazaki, Y. Matsunaga, Y. Nakano, and T. Morita Identification of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-binding Protein in the Venom of Eastern Cottonmouth: A NEW ROLE OF SNAKE VENOM MYOTOXIC LYS49-PHOSPHOLIPASE A2 J. Biol. Chem., August 26, 2005; 280(34): 29989 - 29992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Lee, D. Lopes de Menezes, J. Vora, A. Harris, H. Ye, L. Nordahl, E. Garrett, E. Samara, S. L. Aukerman, A. B. Gelb, et al. In vivo Target Modulation and Biological Activity of CHIR-258, a Multitargeted Growth Factor Receptor Kinase Inhibitor, in Colon Cancer Models Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 11(10): 3633 - 3641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Manenti, E. Riccardi, S. Marchini, E. Naumova, I. Floriani, A. Garofalo, R. Dossi, E. Marrazzo, D. Ribatti, E. Scanziani, et al. Circulating plasma vascular endothelial growth factor in mice bearing human ovarian carcinoma xenograft correlates with tumor progression and response to therapy Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2005; 4(5): 715 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Short, A. Derrien, R. P. Narsimhan, J. Lawler, D. E. Ingber, and B. R. Zetter Inhibition of endothelial cell migration by thrombospondin-1 type-1 repeats is mediated by {beta}1 integrins J. Cell Biol., February 14, 2005; 168(4): 643 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-P. Gerber and N. Ferrara Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics of Bevacizumab as Monotherapy or in Combination with Cytotoxic Therapy in Preclinical Studies Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 65(3): 671 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. H. Fernando and H. I. Hurwitz Targeted Therapy of Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Experience with Bevacizumab Oncologist, June 1, 2004; 9(suppl_1): 11 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Herbst and A. B. Sandler Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Antiangiogenic Therapy: What Can Be Expected of Bevacizumab? Oncologist, June 1, 2004; 9(suppl_1): 19 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| THE ONCOLOGIST | STEM CELLS | CME | ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS |