This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: theoncologist.2008-0224v1 14/3/222    most recent eLetters: Submit a response to this article Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints/Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Klepin, H. D. Articles by Balducci, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Klepin, H. D. Articles by Balducci, L.

Acute Myelogenous Leukemia in Older Adults

^aWake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA; ^bH. Lee Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA

Key Words. Acute myelogenous leukemia • Elderly • Geriatric assessment • Treatment

Correspondence: Correspondence: Heidi D. Klepin, M.D., M.S., Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, USA. Telephone: 336-716-7975; Fax: 336-716-5687; e-mail: hklepin{at}wfubmc.edu

Received October 10, 2008; accepted for publication February 12, 2009.

Disclosures: Heidi D. Klepin: None; Lodovico Balducci: Honoraria: Amgen, Novartis. The content of this article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias. No financial relationships relevant to the content of this article have been disclosed by the independent peer reviewers.

The incidence of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) increases with age. Older AML patients, generally defined by age 60 years, have worse treatment outcomes than younger patients. While selected older patients can benefit from standard therapies, as a group they experience greater treatment-related toxicity, lower remission rates, shorter disease-free survival times, and shorter overall survival times. Outcome disparity is in part explained by age-related biologic features. Older patients are more likely to present with unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities, multidrug resistance phenotypes, and secondary AML. However, even older adults with favorable tumor biology have a worse prognosis than younger patients. %Patient-specific factors, including impaired physical function and comorbidity, independently predict greater treatment toxicity and shorter survival. Improving patient assessment strategies is critical to identify those patients who are most likely to benefit from induction and postremission therapies. In addition, continued efforts to identify more effective and tolerable induction and postremission strategies are needed for this population. Investigations of hypomethylating agents and signal transduction inhibitors hold promise for the treatment of AML patients. Steady advances in the field of hematopoietic transplantation, including use of reduced intensity transplants, may result in additional curative options available to selected older adults. Finally, improved supportive care strategies are needed to maximize treatment outcomes.